SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Daniel G. Rasines

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel G. Rasines.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Local asymptotics of selection models with applications in Bayesian selective inference

Contemporary focus on selective inference has renewed interest in the theory of selection models. In this paper, we analyze the asymptotic properties of selection models built on independent and identically distributed observations. We show that, under suitable regularity conditions, they behave asymptotically like a sequence of Gaussian selection models. This provides a natural generalization of the Local Asymptotic Normality framework of Le Cam (1960), and indicates a notion of local asymptotic selective normality as the appropriate simplifying theoretical framework for analysis of selective inference. As a key application, we consider the methodological consequences of the asymptotic theory for Bayesian selective inference. Specifically, we prove that the posterior distribution constructed from a selection model under a fixed prior is asymptotically equivalent to the posterior derived in the corresponding asymptotic Gaussian selection model under a uniform prior. Notably, the latter is often mis-calibrated in a frequentist sense, particularly for one-sided selection mechanisms. This demonstrates that the familiar asymptotic equivalence between Bayesian and frequentist approaches does not hold under selection.

math.ST

Splitting strategies for post-selection inference

We consider the problem of providing valid inference for a selected parameter in a sparse regression setting. It is well known that classical regression tools can be unreliable in this context due to the bias generated in the selection step. Many approaches have been proposed in recent years to ensure inferential validity. Here, we consider a simple alternative to data splitting based on randomising the response vector, which allows for higher selection and inferential power than the former and is applicable with an arbitrary selection rule. We provide a theoretical and empirical comparison of both methods and derive a Central Limit Theorem for the randomisation approach. Our investigations show that the gain in power can be substantial.

stat.ME

Bayesian Selective Inference: Non-informative Priors

We discuss Bayesian inference for parameters selected using the data. First, we provide a critical analysis of the existing positions in the literature regarding the correct Bayesian approach under selection. Second, we propose two types of non-informative priors for selection models. These priors may be employed to produce a posterior distribution in the absence of prior information as well as to provide well-calibrated frequentist inference for the selected parameter. We test the proposed priors empirically in several scenarios.

math.ST