SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Daniel Gregorek

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Gregorek.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Towards Dynamic Fault Tolerance for Hardware-Implemented Artificial Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Approach

The functionality of electronic circuits can be seriously impaired by the occurrence of dynamic hardware faults. Particularly, for digital ultra low-power systems, a reduced safety margin can increase the probability of dynamic failures. This work investigates a deep learning approach to mitigate dynamic fault impact for artificial neural networks. As a theoretic use case, image compression by means of a deep autoencoder is considered. The evaluation shows a linear dependency of the test loss to the fault injection rate during testing. If the number of training epochs is sufficiently large, our approach shows more than 2% reduction of the test loss compared to a baseline network without the need of additional hardware. At the absence of faults during testing, our approach also decreases the test loss compared to reference networks.

cs.LG

Transaction Level Analysis for a Clustered and Hardware-Enhanced Task Manager on Homogeneous Many-Core Systems

The increasing parallelism of many-core systems demands for efficient strategies for the run-time system management. Due to the large number of cores the management overhead has a rising impact to the overall system performance. This work analyzes a clustered infrastructure of dedicated hardware nodes to manage a homogeneous many-core system. The hardware nodes implement a message passing protocol and perform the task mapping and synchronization at run-time. To make meaningful mapping decisions, the global management nodes employ a workload status communication mechanism. This paper discusses the design-space of the dedicated infrastructure by means of task mapping use-cases and a parallel benchmark including application-interference. We evaluate the architecture in terms of application speedup and analyze the mechanism for the status communication. A comparison versus centralized and fully-distributed configurations demonstrates the reduction of the computation and communication management overhead for our approach.

cs.DC