SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Daniel Kristanto

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Kristanto.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Overlooked weak structural connections support human cognition under nonlinear connectome scaling

Human cognition depends on large scale communication constrained by white matter architecture. Although weak connections are abundant in mammalian connectomes, they have long been treated as noise and downweighted because of tractography uncertainty in the human brain, and their relevance to human cognition and large scale functional organization remains unresolved. Across multiple datasets and tractography pipelines, we show that, when tractography derived connectivity weights are interpreted through a nonlinear weighting framework, weak connections make measurable contributions to cognitive prediction, functional connectivity simulation, and structure-function coupling. These effects are selective: nonlinear weighting improves the prediction of general cognitive ability and memory more than that of crystallized intelligence or processing speed, consistent with the notion that weak connections preferentially expand the modal repertoire of brain networks to enhance both large scale integration and fine grained segregation, thereby supporting the functional balance essential for diverse cognitive abilities. Importantly, these effects are replicated in a reliability aware connectome generated by integrating two post tractography filtering methods, in which preserving weak links consistently outperforms conventional thresholding strategies. Finally, we show that weak connections contain functionally informative subsets organized along systems level and transcriptomic gradients. In particular, a specific class of weak connections, predominantly linking visual and motor systems with limbic regions and characterized by negative gene coexpression, exerts a disproportionately large influence on brain function.

q-bio.NC

What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?

Over the last decades, cognitive psychology has come to fair consensus about the ontological structure of human intelligence. However, it remains an open question, whether anatomical properties of the brain support the same ontology. The present study explored the ontological structure derived from neuroanatomical networks associated with performance in 15 cognitive tasks indicating various abilities. Results suggest that the brain-derived (neurometric) ontology is partly consistent with the cognitive performance-derived (psychometric) ontology. However, there are interpretable and complementary differences as well. Moreover, the cortical areas associated with different inferred abilities are segregated, with little or no overlap. Nevertheless, these spatially segregated cortical areas are integrated via denser white matter structural connections as compared with the general brain connectome. The integration of ability-related cortical networks constitutes a neural counterpart to the psychometric construct of general intelligence, while the consistency and differences between psychometric and neurometric ontologies represent crucial pieces of knowledge for theory building, clinical diagnostics and treatment.

q-bio.NC