Daniel Lichau | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

LIBAD: A Multimodal Anomaly Detection Benchmark for Li-Ion Battery Electrode Manufacturing

Multimodal industrial anomaly detection has largely focused on discrete products using strongly correlated RGB and 3D observations, leaving continuous process manufacturing and weakly correlated sensing modalities underexplored. We introduce LIBAD, the first multimodal anomaly detection benchmark for Li-ion battery electrode manufacturing. Collected from real roll-to-roll production lines, LIBAD provides aligned double-sided visible-light imaging, high-resolution X-ray radiography, and inline-compatible low-resolution X-ray radiography. Electrode patches in LIBAD exhibit highly homogeneous material appearance, while defect evidence can be strong in one modality but weak or absent in another, resulting in pronounced cross-modal anomaly inconsistency. Benchmarks of representative methods under the inline-compatible visible-light and low-resolution X-ray setting exhibit limited transferability and consistently high false-positive rates. We therefore propose DA-Core, a memory-based method that jointly considers feature-space coverage and local density of normal features during coreset selection, allowing compact memory banks to better preserve fine-grained normal variations. With a coreset ratio of 0.05, DA-Core reduces FPR95 from 60.4% to 54.3% compared with standard farthest point sampling. At this ratio, DA-Core also outperforms the best standard coreset result (obtained at 0.20) while reducing inference time by 43.9%. These results suggest that both the data distribution of normal features and the modality relationship itself require explicit consideration when designing anomaly detection methods for process manufacturing.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Incomplete Multimodal Industrial Anomaly Detection via Cross-Modal Distillation

Recent studies of multimodal industrial anomaly detection (IAD) based on 3D point clouds and RGB images have highlighted the importance of exploiting the redundancy and complementarity among modalities for accurate classification and segmentation. However, achieving multimodal IAD in practical production lines remains a work in progress. It is essential to consider the trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with the introduction of new modalities while ensuring compatibility with current processes. Existing quality control processes combine rapid in-line inspections, such as optical and infrared imaging with high-resolution but time-consuming near-line characterization techniques, including industrial CT and electron microscopy to manually or semi-automatically locate and analyze defects in the production of Li-ion batteries and composite materials. Given the cost and time limitations, only a subset of the samples can be inspected by all in-line and near-line methods, and the remaining samples are only evaluated through one or two forms of in-line inspection. To fully exploit data for deep learning-driven automatic defect detection, the models must have the ability to leverage multimodal training and handle incomplete modalities during inference. In this paper, we propose CMDIAD, a Cross-Modal Distillation framework for IAD to demonstrate the feasibility of a Multi-modal Training, Few-modal Inference (MTFI) pipeline. Our findings show that the MTFI pipeline can more effectively utilize incomplete multimodal information compared to applying only a single modality for training and inference. Moreover, we investigate the reasons behind the asymmetric performance improvement using point clouds or RGB images as the main modality of inference. This provides a foundation for our future multimodal dataset construction with additional modalities from manufacturing scenarios.

cs.CV↗