arXiv subjects

Daniele Maria Di Nosse

Publications and source records attributed to Daniele Maria Di Nosse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mitigating Adverse Selection in Concentrated Liquidity AMMs with Dynamic Fees: An Agent-Based Model Approach

Automated Market Makers based on concentrated liquidity, such as Uniswap v3, significantly improve capital efficiency but expose Liquidity Providers (LPs) to adverse selection costs, formalized as Loss-Versus-Rebalancing (LVR). While theoretical literature quantifies these costs, the interplay between realistic blockchain microstructure and endogenous pricing mechanisms remains under-explored. This paper develops a granular Agent-Based Model of a Uniswap v3 pool interacting with a stochastic reference market governed by Heston volatility dynamics. The framework incorporates discrete block propagation, mempool latency, and a heterogeneous population of agents, including latency-sensitive arbitrageurs, smart routers, Maximal Extractable Value searchers, and active LPs benchmarked against a frictionless rebalancing strategy. We propose and evaluate dynamic fee schedules driven by volatility and order-flow toxicity proxies intended to compensate LPs for adverse-selection losses. Our simulations investigate the conditions under which LPs can achieve positive hedged Profit and Loss (fees minus LVR). The analysis suggests that dynamic fee adjustments can improve hedged LP profitability mainly by increasing fee income in states associated with stale-price risk. Depending on the configuration, these rules may also affect realized LVR, but the current aggregate results support compensation for LVR more directly than a reduction of LVR itself.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2025

Deviations from Tradition: Stylized Facts in the Era of DeFi

Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) are now a significant component of the financial world where billions of dollars are traded daily. Differently from traditional markets, which are typically based on Limit Order Books, DEXs typically work as Automated Market Makers, and, since the implementation of Uniswap v3, feature concentrated liquidity. By investigating the twenty-four most active pools in Uniswap v3 during 2023 and 2024, we empirically study how this structural change in the organization of the markets modifies the well-studied stylized facts of prices, liquidity, and order flow observed in traditional markets. We find a series of new statistical regularities in the distributions and cross-autocorrelation functions of these variables that we are able to associate either with the market structure (e.g., the execution of orders in blocks) or with the intense activity of Maximal Extractable Value searchers, such as Just-in-Time liquidity providers and sandwich attackers.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2024

A Multi-step Approach for Minimizing Risk in Decentralized Exchanges

Decentralized Exchanges are becoming even more predominant in today's finance. Driven by the need to study this phenomenon from an academic perspective, the SIAG/FME Code Quest 2023 was announced. Specifically, participating teams were asked to implement, in Python, the basic functions of an Automated Market Maker and a liquidity provision strategy in an Automated Market Maker to minimize the Conditional Value at Risk, a critical measure of investment risk. As the competition's winning team, we highlight our approach in this work. In particular, as the dependence of the final return on the initial wealth distribution is highly non-linear, we cannot use standard ad-hoc approaches. Additionally, classical minimization techniques would require a significant computational load due to the cost of the target function. For these reasons, we propose a three-step approach. In the first step, the target function is approximated by a Kernel Ridge Regression. Then, the approximating function is minimized. In the final step, the previously discovered minimum is utilized as the starting point for directly optimizing the desired target function. By using this procedure, we can both reduce the computational complexity and increase the accuracy of the solution. Finally, the overall computational load is further reduced thanks to an algorithmic trick concerning the returns simulation and the usage of Cython.

q-fin.PM↗