SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Danil Gorinevski

Publications and source records attributed to Danil Gorinevski.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mathematical Foundations for Peer-to-Peer Lattice Computation

We give structured proofs for five mathematical propositions governing synchronous peer-to-peer computation on a finite grid graph embedded in $\mathbb{Z}^2$. Proposition 1 gives three lower bounds: a transport-work bound $\sum_i a_i \ell_i \geq W_1(μ,ν)$ attained by every shortest-path schedule; a completion-depth bound $D_{\min} \geq r_μ$ attained by non-congesting parallel routing; and a compressive-reduction edge bound $|E'| \geq \mathrm{St}_G(\mathrm{supp}(μ)\cup\{x_\star\})$. A negative result refutes naive $O(f_{\text{act}}P^{3/2})$ concentration for sink-trunk loads under corner-sink dimension-order routing, showing variance $Θ(f_{\text{act}}(1-f_{\text{act}})P^2)$. Proposition 2 establishes, under the $α$-$β$-$γ$ collective-communication and a Mixture-of-Experts sparse-activation model, that the grid-to-cluster latency ratio improves monotonically as $f_{\text{act}}$ shrinks whenever cluster fixed overhead dominates the grid geometric constant. Proposition 3 identifies a sufficient algebraic criterion for schedule-independent reduction: update rules decomposing into a local map and an abelian-monoid merge, expressed as a product-preserving functor from the Lawvere theory of commutative monoids into the hardware-state category. Proposition 4 bounds the conditional expected route length under i.i.d. site failure in the subcritical regime $δ< p_c^{\text{site}}(\mathbb{Z}^2)$ by an additive detour, using Aizenman-Barsky exponential cluster-size decay. Proposition 5 augments the grid with $k$ uniform long-range shortcuts per node, collapsing the typical shortest-path length from $Θ(\sqrt{P})$ to $O(\log P)$ under a mean-field (Erdős-Rényi) universality argument -- rigorous for the 1-D-ring base (Newman-Watts-Strogatz), conjectural for the 2-D-grid base.

cs.DC

Nidus: Externalized Reasoning for AI-Assisted Engineering

We present Nidus, a governance runtime that mechanizes the V-model for AI-assisted software delivery. In the self-hosting deployment, three LLM families (Claude, Gemini, Codex) delivered a 100,000-line system under proof obligations verified against the current obligation set on every commit. The system governed its own construction. Engineering invariants - traced requirements, justified architecture, evidenced deliveries - cannot be reliably maintained as learned behavior; assurance requires enforcement by a mechanism external to the proposer. Nidus externalizes the engineering methodology into a decidable artifact verified on every mutation before persistence. Organizational standards compile into guidebooks - constraint libraries imported by governed projects and enforced by decidable evaluation. Four contributions: (1) recursive self-governance - the constraint surface constrains mutations to itself; (2) stigmergic coordination - friction from the surface routes agents without central control; (3) proximal spec reinforcement - the living artifact externalizes the engineering context that RL and long-chain reasoning try to internalize; the specification is the reward function, UNSAT verdicts shape behavior at inference time, no weight updates; (4) governance theater prevention - compliance evidence cannot be fabricated within the modeled mutation path. The constraint surface compounds: each obligation permanently eliminates a class of unengineered output. The artifact's development history is a formal development - every state satisfies all active obligations, and the obligation set grows monotonically.

cs.SE