arXiv subjects

Danny Weyns

Publications and source records attributed to Danny Weyns.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2022

Lifelong Self-Adaptation: Self-Adaptation Meets Lifelong Machine Learning

In the past years, machine learning (ML) has become a popular approach to support self-adaptation. While ML techniques enable dealing with several problems in self-adaptation, such as scalable decision-making, they are also subject to inherent challenges. In this paper, we focus on one such challenge that is particularly important for self-adaptation: ML techniques are designed to deal with a set of predefined tasks associated with an operational domain; they have problems to deal with new emerging tasks, such as concept shift in input data that is used for learning. To tackle this challenge, we present \textit{lifelong self-adaptation}: a novel approach to self-adaptation that enhances self-adaptive systems that use ML techniques with a lifelong ML layer. The lifelong ML layer tracks the running system and its environment, associates this knowledge with the current tasks, identifies new tasks based on differentiations, and updates the learning models of the self-adaptive system accordingly. We present a reusable architecture for lifelong self-adaptation and apply it to the case of concept drift caused by unforeseen changes of the input data of a learning model that is used for decision-making in self-adaptation. We validate lifelong self-adaptation for two types of concept drift using two cases.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

SEAByTE: A Self-adaptive Micro-service System Artifact for Automating A/B Testing

Micro-services are a common architectural approach to software development today. An indispensable tool for evolving micro-service systems is A/B testing. In A/B testing, two variants, A and B, are applied in an experimental setting. By measuring the outcome of an evaluation criterion, developers can make evidence-based decisions to guide the evolution of their software. Recent studies highlight the need for enhancing the automation when such experiments are conducted in iterations. To that end, we contribute a novel artifact that aims at enhancing the automation of an experimentation pipeline of a micro-service system relying on the principles of self-adaptation. Concretely, we propose SEAByTE, an experimental framework for testing novel self-adaptation solutions to enhance the automation of continuous A/B testing of a micro-service based system. We illustrate the use of the SEAByTE artifact with a concrete example.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2022

ActivFORMS: A Formally-Founded Model-Based Approach to Engineer Self-Adaptive Systems

Self-adaptation equips a computing system with a feedback loop that enables it dealing with change caused by uncertainties during operation, such as changing availability of resources and fluctuating workloads. To ensure that the system complies with the adaptation goals, recent research suggests the use of formal techniques at runtime. Yet, existing approaches have three limitations that affect their practical applicability: (i) they ignore correctness of the behavior of the feedback loop, (ii) they rely on exhaustive verification at runtime to select adaptation options to realize the adaptation goals, which is time and resource demanding, and (iii) they provide limited or no support for changing adaptation goals at runtime. To tackle these shortcomings, we present ActivFORMS (Active FORmal Models for Self-adaptation). ActivFORMS contributes an end-to-end approach for engineering self-adaptive systems, spanning four main stages of the life cycle of a feedback loop: design, deployment, runtime adaptation, and evolution. We also present ActivFORMS-ta, a tool-supported instance of ActivFORMS that leverages timed automata models and statistical model checking at runtime. We validate the research results using an IoT application for building security monitoring that is deployed in Leuven. The experimental results demonstrate that ActivFORMS supports correctness of the behavior of the feedback loop, achieves the adaptation goals in an efficient way, and supports changing adaptation goals at runtime.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Report on A Formally-Founded Model-Based Approach to Engineer Self-Adaptive Systems

Self-adaptive systems manage themselves to deal with uncertainties that can only be resolved during operation. A common approach to realize self-adaptation is by adding a feedback loop to the system that monitors the system and adapts it to realize a set of adaptation goals. ActivFORMS (Active FORmal Models for Self-adaptation) provides an end-to-end approach for engineering self-adaptive systems. ActivFORMS relies on feedback loops that consists of formally verified models that are directly deployed and executed at runtime to realize self-adaptation. At runtime, the approach relies on statistical verification techniques that allow efficient analysis of the possible options for adaptation. Further, ActivFORMS supports on-the-fly changes of adaptation goals and updates of the verified models to to meet the new goals. ActivFORMSi provides a tool-supported instance of ActivFORMS. The approach has been validates using an IoT application for building security monitoring. This report provides complementary material to the paper ``ActivFORMS: A Formally-Founded Model-Based Approach to Engineer Self-Adaptive Systems'' [Weyns and Iftikhar 2019].

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Lifelong Computing

Computing systems form the backbone of many aspects of our life, hence they are becoming as vital as water, electricity, and road infrastructures for our society. Yet, engineering long running computing systems that achieve their goals in ever-changing environments pose significant challenges. Currently, we can build computing systems that adjust or learn over time to match changes that were anticipated. However, dealing with unanticipated changes, such as anomalies, novelties, new goals or constraints, requires system evolution, which remains in essence a human-driven activity. Given the growing complexity of computing systems and the vast amount of highly complex data to process, this approach will eventually become unmanageable. To break through the status quo, we put forward a new paradigm for the design and operation of computing systems that we coin "lifelong computing." The paradigm starts from computing-learning systems that integrate computing/service modules and learning modules. Computing warehouses offer such computing elements together with data sheets and usage guides. When detecting anomalies, novelties, new goals or constraints, a lifelong computing system activates an evolutionary self-learning engine that runs online experiments to determine how the computing-learning system needs to evolve to deal with the changes, thereby changing its architecture and integrating new computing elements from computing warehouses as needed. Depending on the domain at hand, some activities of lifelong computing systems can be supported by humans. We motivate the need for lifelong computing with a future fish farming scenario, outline a blueprint architecture for lifelong computing systems, and highlight key research challenges to realise the vision of lifelong computing.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Applying Machine Learning in Self-Adaptive Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Recently, we witness a rapid increase in the use of machine learning in self-adaptive systems. Machine learning has been used for a variety of reasons, ranging from learning a model of the environment of a system during operation to filtering large sets of possible configurations before analysing them. While a body of work on the use of machine learning in self-adaptive systems exists, there is currently no systematic overview of this area. Such overview is important for researchers to understand the state of the art and direct future research efforts. This paper reports the results of a systematic literature review that aims at providing such an overview. We focus on self-adaptive systems that are based on a traditional Monitor-Analyze-Plan-Execute feedback loop (MAPE). The research questions are centred on the problems that motivate the use of machine learning in self-adaptive systems, the key engineering aspects of learning in self-adaptation, and open challenges. The search resulted in 6709 papers, of which 109 were retained for data collection. Analysis of the collected data shows that machine learning is mostly used for updating adaptation rules and policies to improve system qualities, and managing resources to better balance qualities and resources. These problems are primarily solved using supervised and interactive learning with classification, regression and reinforcement learning as the dominant methods. Surprisingly, unsupervised learning that naturally fits automation is only applied in a small number of studies. Key open challenges in this area include the performance of learning, managing the effects of learning, and dealing with more complex types of goals. From the insights derived from this systematic literature review we outline an initial design process for applying machine learning in self-adaptive systems that are based on MAPE feedback loops.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2021

How do we Evaluate Self-adaptive Software Systems?

With the increase of research in self-adaptive systems, there is a need to better understand the way research contributions are evaluated. Such insights will support researchers to better compare new findings when developing new knowledge for the community. However, so far there is no clear overview of how evaluations are performed in self-adaptive systems. To address this gap, we conduct a mapping study. The study focuses on experimental evaluations published in the last decade at the prime venue of research in software engineering for self-adaptive systems -- the International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS). Results point out that specifics of self-adaptive systems require special attention in the experimental process, including the distinction of the managing system (i.e., the target of evaluation) and the managed system, the presence of uncertainties that affect the system behavior and hence need to be taken into account in data analysis, and the potential of managed systems to be reused across experiments, beyond replications. To conclude, we offer a set of suggestions derived from our study that can be used as input to enhance future experiments in self-adaptive systems.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Towards Better Adaptive Systems by Combining MAPE, Control Theory, and Machine Learning

Two established approaches to engineer adaptive systems are architecture-based adaptation that uses a Monitor-Analysis-Planning-Executing (MAPE) loop that reasons over architectural models (aka Knowledge) to make adaptation decisions, and control-based adaptation that relies on principles of control theory (CT) to realize adaptation. Recently, we also observe a rapidly growing interest in applying machine learning (ML) to support different adaptation mechanisms. While MAPE and CT have particular characteristics and strengths to be applied independently, in this paper, we are concerned with the question of how these approaches are related with one another and whether combining them and supporting them with ML can produce better adaptive systems. We motivate the combined use of different adaptation approaches using a scenario of a cloud-based enterprise system and illustrate the analysis when combining the different approaches. To conclude, we offer a set of open questions for further research in this interesting area.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

On the Impact of Applying Machine Learning in the Decision-Making of Self-Adaptive Systems

Recently, we have been witnessing an increasing use of machine learning methods in self-adaptive systems. Machine learning methods offer a variety of use cases for supporting self-adaptation, e.g., to keep runtime models up to date, reduce large adaptation spaces, or update adaptation rules. Yet, since machine learning methods apply in essence statistical methods, they may have an impact on the decisions made by a self-adaptive system. Given the wide use of formal approaches to provide guarantees for the decisions made by self-adaptive systems, it is important to investigate the impact of applying machine learning methods when such approaches are used. In this paper, we study one particular instance that combines linear regression to reduce the adaptation space of a self-adaptive system with statistical model checking to analyze the resulting adaptation options. We use computational learning theory to determine a theoretical bound on the impact of the machine learning method on the predictions made by the verifier. We illustrate and evaluate the theoretical result using a scenario of the DeltaIoT artifact. To conclude, we look at opportunities for future research in this area.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Decentralized Self-Adaptive Systems: A Mapping Study

With the increasing ubiquity and scale of self-adaptive systems, there is a growing need to decentralize the functionality that realizes self-adaptation. Our focus is on architecture-based self-adaptive systems where one or more functions for monitoring, analyzing, planning, and executing are realized by multiple components that coordinate with one another. While some earlier studies have shed light on existing work on the decentralization of self-adaptive systems, there is currently no clear overview of the state of the art in decentralization of self-adaptive systems. Yet, having a precise view on the state of the art in decentralized self-adaptive systems is crucial for researchers to understand existing solutions and drive future research efforts. To address this gap, we conducted a mapping study. The study focused on papers published at 24 important venues that publish research on self-adaptation. The study focused on the motivations for choosing a decentralized approach to realize self-adaptation, the adaptation functions that are decentralized, the realization of the coordination, and the open challenges in the area.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Uncertainty in Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Community Perspective

One of the primary drivers for self-adaptation is ensuring that systems achieve their goals regardless of the uncertainties they face during operation. Nevertheless, the concept of uncertainty in self-adaptive systems is still insufficiently understood. Several taxonomies of uncertainty have been proposed, and a substantial body of work exists on methods to tame uncertainty. Yet, these taxonomies and methods do not fully convey the research community's perception on what constitutes uncertainty in self-adaptive systems and how to tackle it. To understand this perception and learn from it, we conducted a survey comprising two complementary stages. In the first stage, we focused on current research and development. In the second stage, we focused on directions for future research. The key findings of the first stage are: a) an overview of uncertainty sources considered in self-adaptive systems, b) an overview of existing methods used to tackle uncertainty in concrete applications, c) insights into the impact of uncertainty on non-functional requirements, d) insights into different opinions in the perception of uncertainty within the community, and the need for standardised uncertainty-handling processes to facilitate uncertainty management in self-adaptive systems. The key findings of the second stage are: a) the insight that over 70% of the participants believe that self-adaptive systems can be engineered to cope with unanticipated change, b) a set of potential approaches for dealing with unanticipated change, c) a set of open challenges in mitigating uncertainty in self-adaptive systems, in particular in those with safety-critical requirements. From these findings, we outline an initial reference process to manage uncertainty in self-adaptive systems.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2020

Towards Bridging the Gap between Control and Self-Adaptive System Properties

Two of the main paradigms used to build adaptive software employ different types of properties to capture relevant aspects of the system's run-time behavior. On the one hand, control systems consider properties that concern static aspects like stability, as well as dynamic properties that capture the transient evolution of variables such as settling time. On the other hand, self-adaptive systems consider mostly non-functional properties that capture concerns such as performance, reliability, and cost. In general, it is not easy to reconcile these two types of properties or identify under which conditions they constitute a good fit to provide run-time guarantees. There is a need of identifying the key properties in the areas of control and self-adaptation, as well as of characterizing and mapping them to better understand how they relate and possibly complement each other. In this paper, we take a first step to tackle this problem by: (1) identifying a set of key properties in control theory, (2) illustrating the formalization of some of these properties employing temporal logic languages commonly used to engineer self-adaptive software systems, and (3) illustrating how to map key properties that characterize self-adaptive software systems into control properties, leveraging their formalization in temporal logics. We illustrate the different steps of the mapping on an exemplar case in the cloud computing domain and conclude with identifying open challenges in the area.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2019

An Architectural Style for Self-Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems

Modern distributed software systems often operate in dynamic environments in which operation conditions change continuously and subsystems may come and go at will, e.g. intelligent traffic management and multi-robot systems. To manage these dynamics, these systems have to self-adapt their structures and behaviors dynamically. While we have witnessed significant progress over the past decade in the manner in which such systems are designed, persistent challenges remain. In particular, dealing with distribution and decentralized control remains one of the major challenges in self-adaptive systems. This report presents an architecture style that supports software architects with designing architectures for a family of decentralized self-adaptive systems. The architecture style structures the software in a number of interacting autonomous entities (agents) that cooperatively realize the system tasks. Multi-agent systems derived from the architectural style realize flexibility (agents adapt their behavior and interactions to variable operating conditions) and openness (agents cope autonomously with other agents that enter and leave the system). The architectural style consists of five related patterns that distill domain-specific architectural knowledge derived from extensive experiences with developing various multi-agent systems. The architectural patterns are specified using pi-ADL, a formal architectural description language supporting specification of dynamic architectures. This specification provides architects with a rigorous description of the architecture elements of the patterns, their interactions and behavior. We illustrate how we have applied the architectural style with excerpts of two cases from our practice: an experimental system for anticipatory traffic routing and an industrial logistic system for automated transportation in warehouse environments.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2019

Perpetual Assurances for Self-Adaptive Systems

Providing assurances for self-adaptive systems is challenging. A primary underlying problem is uncertainty that may stem from a variety of different sources, ranging from incomplete knowledge to sensor noise and uncertain behavior of humans in the loop. Providing assurances that the self-adaptive system complies with its requirements calls for an enduring process spanning the whole lifetime of the system. In this process, humans and the system jointly derive and integrate new evidence and arguments, which we coined perpetual assurances for self-adaptive systems. In this paper, we provide a background framework and the foundation for perpetual assurances for self-adaptive systems. We elaborate on the concrete challenges of offering perpetual assurances, requirements for solutions, realization techniques and mechanisms to make solutions suitable. We also present benchmark criteria to compare solutions. We then present a concrete exemplar that researchers can use to assess and compare approaches for perpetual assurances for self-adaptation.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2018

Engineering Trustworthy Self-Adaptive Software with Dynamic Assurance Cases

Building on concepts drawn from control theory, self-adaptive software handles environmental and internal uncertainties by dynamically adjusting its architecture and parameters in response to events such as workload changes and component failures. Self-adaptive software is increasingly expected to meet strict functional and non-functional requirements in applications from areas as diverse as manufacturing, healthcare and finance. To address this need, we introduce a methodology for the systematic ENgineering of TRUstworthy Self-adaptive sofTware (ENTRUST). ENTRUST uses a combination of (1) design-time and runtime modelling and verification, and (2) industry-adopted assurance processes to develop trustworthy self-adaptive software and assurance cases arguing the suitability of the software for its intended application. To evaluate the effectiveness of our methodology, we present a tool-supported instance of ENTRUST and its use to develop proof-of-concept self-adaptive software for embedded and service-based systems from the oceanic monitoring and e-finance domains, respectively. The experimental results show that ENTRUST can be used to engineer self-adaptive software systems in different application domains and to generate dynamic assurance cases for these systems.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2012

A Case Study on Formal Verification of Self-Adaptive Behaviors in a Decentralized System

Self-adaptation is a promising approach to manage the complexity of modern software systems. A self-adaptive system is able to adapt autonomously to internal dynamics and changing conditions in the environment to achieve particular quality goals. Our particular interest is in decentralized self-adaptive systems, in which central control of adaptation is not an option. One important challenge in self-adaptive systems, in particular those with decentralized control of adaptation, is to provide guarantees about the intended runtime qualities. In this paper, we present a case study in which we use model checking to verify behavioral properties of a decentralized self-adaptive system. Concretely, we contribute with a formalized architecture model of a decentralized traffic monitoring system and prove a number of self-adaptation properties for flexibility and robustness. To model the main processes in the system we use timed automata, and for the specification of the required properties we use timed computation tree logic. We use the Uppaal tool to specify the system and verify the flexibility and robustness properties.

cs.SE↗