arXiv subjects

Darya Melnyk

Publications and source records attributed to Darya Melnyk.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Faster Convergence of Multidimensional Approximate Agreement via Smallest Enclosing Balls

This work considers the multidimensional approximate agreement problem. In this problem, $n$ parties in a distributed system, up to $t$ of which may be corrupted by a Byzantine adversary, need to output vectors that are close to each other and that lie inside the convex hull of all non-corrupted input vectors. We assume that nodes communicate in a fully-connected authenticated network and analyze synchronous and asynchronous communication models. The focus of this work is on the contraction factor of approximate agreement protocols. The first multidimensional approximate agreement protocols had a contraction rate of $1-1/n$(VG, PODC'13) and $\sqrt[d]{1/2}$(MH, STOC'13). While a rate below $1$ is sufficient for convergence, it is not sufficient for practical applications. To date, the best known convergence rate of approximate agreement algorithms is $\sqrt{7/8}\approx0.935$ (FN, DISC'18), which is achieved through the MidExtremes protocol. This stands in contrast to the lower bound on the convergence rate in the $1$-dimensional setting, which is $1/2$. In this work, we propose BallMidpoint - a novel approximate agreement protocol with a contraction rate of $1/\sqrt{2}\approx 0.707$ in the synchronous and the asynchronous communication models. This algorithm satisfies the optimal resilience under convex validity. The presented contraction rate is achieved by choosing the midpoint of the smallest enclosing ball of the so-called local safe areas, and it is tight for the presented algorithms. Similar to (FN, DISC'18), our algorithm is coordinate-free, and the point inside the safe area can be computed efficiently. This work presents the first multidimensional approximate agreement protocol where the convergence rate is closer to the best known lower bound rather than the upper bound of $1$.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Privacy Attacks on Stable Marriage

The stable marriage problem appears in many privacy-sensitive domains, for example in the National Resident Matching Program in the US. In such applications, preserving the privacy of users' preference lists is essential to prevent strategic manipulation, discourage misreporting, and comply with data protection regulations. In this work, we investigate privacy attacks on stable marriage algorithms. Assuming that the attacker (e.g., the hospitals) can repeatedly interact with the stable marriage algorithm, we demonstrate how such interactions can reveal private preferences of the non-malicious side (e.g., the residents). We show that the widely applied Gale-Shapley Matching Algorithm, where the proposers' side is malicious, is vulnerable to privacy attacks and all honest agents' preferences can be revealed. We further investigate which preference distributions of the honest, non-malicious side are susceptible to privacy attacks and show that the Gale-Shapley Matching Algorithm where the honest side proposes can preserve privacy in non-susceptible preference distributions. We extend our results to the decentralized setting and show that the attacker's side can infer all preference orderings. In an experimental evaluation, we test privacy attacks on synthetic and real-world data and show that real-world data is indeed susceptible to privacy attacks. This work underlines a need for new privacy-preserving stable marriage algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Resilient Byzantine Agreement with Predictions

This paper studies the Byzantine Agreement problem where the nodes have access to a predictor that flags nodes for suspicion of faulty (Byzantine) behavior. We focus on algorithmic resilience -- the maximum number of faulty nodes an algorithm can tolerate -- and present algorithms and impossibility results whose resilience depend on the accuracy of the predictor. As our first main result, we bring a complete characterization of the consistency--robustness trade-offs in both the non-authenticated and authenticated settings: for $n$ nodes and a parameter $α\in [0, 1]$, we present algorithms that tolerate up to $α\cdot n$ faulty nodes when the predictor is correct (consistency), and up to $\frac{1-α}{2} \cdot n - 1$ faulty nodes when the predictor is arbitrarily wrong (robustness); in the authenticated setting the robustness bound improves to $(1-α) \cdot n - 1$. These trade-offs are exactly tight as we show that one additional faulty node renders the problem impossible. Our second main result characterizes smoothness: the rate at which resilience degrades as the predictor becomes less accurate. We show that resilience linearly decreases in the number of wrong predictions as long as that number stays within a constant fraction of $n$. Concretely, in the non-authenticated setting each additional wrong prediction loses one unit of resilience, whereas in the authenticated setting the decline is halved since two wrong predictions are needed to lose one unit of resilience.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Online Graph Embedding in Star Graphs

Graph embedding is a fundamental problem of mapping nodes of a guest graph into a host graph while minimizing the distance distortion, with broad applications, including virtual network embeddings into physical topologies, VLSI design, or community detection in social networks. However, in many real-world applications the guest graph changes over time and the embedding can adapt to these changes (e.g. virtual machine migration in network embeddings). Static embeddings are inherently inefficient in comparison to adaptive embeddings, but it remains an unresolved algorithmic challenge to design efficient embedding algorithms that adapt to the demand on-the-fly, i.e., that are online. In this paper, we derive optimal deterministic and randomized online algorithms for the online graph embedding problem in star host graphs. This is an essential building block on the way to design algorithms for more complex host graphs, representing a single node and its neighborhood. We start by presenting a $1.5$-competitive deterministic algorithm and showing that no deterministic algorithm can perform better. Our main contribution is a randomized algorithm that achieves a significantly better competitive ratio of $11/9 \approx 1.222$. Both the deterministic and the randomized algorithms are optimal, which we prove by deriving tight lower bounds for the competitiveness of any algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Practical Validity Conditions for Byzantine-Tolerant Federated Learning

Robust aggregation is the core operation in Byzantine-tolerant federated learning. To ensure the quality of aggregation independently of data distribution or attacks, validity conditions are needed. They provide geometric guarantees of where the output of the aggregation must lie. The widespread convex validity requires the output to lie in the convex hull of the honest vectors. Although this guarantee is strong in theory, it is poorly suited to modern federated learning systems, as it has dimension-dependent resilience and excludes many practical aggregation rules. We introduce the minimum enclosing ball (MEB) validity condition for robust aggregation, as well as its multiplicative relaxation, $c$-MEB validity, where $c$ is a constant. We show that exact MEB validity still suffers from limited resilience, while relaxed $c$-MEB validity is achievable if a majority of clients is honest, i.e. $n>2t$. We give an optimal MinMax-MEB rule for the relaxed condition with the bound $c<\sqrt{2}$ and prove explicit relaxed-MEB guarantees for standard aggregators including minimum-diameter averaging, medoid and geometric median. Finally, we relate MEB validity to convex, relaxed-convex and box validity studied in prior literature, thus providing a systematic map of geometric validity conditions for Byzantine-robust aggregation. Our results show that relaxed MEB validity connects validity conditions in distributed computing and Byzantine-tolerant aggregation rules, and offers a practical alternative to convex validity.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

The Carrier Pigeon Internet Protocol: An Algorithmic (and Lighthearted) Perspective

The theoretical model behind the pigeon post as a link layer in a communication network was introduced by Shannon (under the guise of studying One-Time Pads for cryptography). That is, to send a one-hop message to $v$, a node $u$ needs a mail pigeon bred and raised at $v$. When sending a message using a pigeon to $v$, node $u$ loses the pigeon. To send another message to $v$, node $u$ needs another pigeon of $v$. It has been demonstrated that the communication bandwidth achievable with pigeon post can exceed that of networks using other media. This has already motivated the introduction of Internet standards that allow the use of pigeons as Internet link-layer media. In this paper, we begin to fill in the missing piece: designing algorithms for breeding and scheduling pigeons to meet a given communication demand efficiently, minimizing the number of pigeons required. We consider singlehop, 2-hop, and multihop pigeon use. While the singlehop variant admits a simple characterization, both the 2-hop and the multihop variants are NP-hard. For the latter variants, we present a polynomial-time algorithm based on demand aggregation that achieves a 2-approximation for the number of pigeons used. We believe that this pigeon-based perspective offers both amusing and instructive insights into network design and hopefully, into ornithology.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2026

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing

We connect three distinct lines of research that have recently explored extensions of the classical LOCAL model of distributed computing: A. distributed quantum computing and non-signaling distributions [e.g. STOC 2024], B. finitely-dependent processes [e.g. Forum Math. Pi 2016], and C. locality in online graph algorithms and dynamic graph algorithms [e.g. ICALP 2023]. We prove new results on the capabilities and limitations of all of these models of computing, for locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs). We show that all these settings can be sandwiched between the classical LOCAL model and what we call the randomized online-LOCAL model. Our work implies limitations on the quantum advantage in the distributed setting, and we also exhibit a new barrier for proving tighter bounds. Our main technical results are these: 1. All LCL problems solvable with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution with locality $O(1)$. This answers an open question by Holroyd [2024], and also presents a new barrier for proving bounds on distributed quantum advantage using causality-based arguments. 2. In rooted trees, if we can solve an LCL problem with locality $o(\log \log \log n)$ in the randomized online-LOCAL model (or any of the weaker models, such as quantum-LOCAL), we can solve it with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. One of many implications is that in rooted trees, $O(\log^\star n)$ locality in quantum-LOCAL is not stronger than $O(\log^\star n)$ locality in classical LOCAL.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

BSB: Towards Demand-Aware Peer Selection With XOR-based Routing

Peer-to-peer networks, as a key enabler of modern networked and distributed systems, rely on peer-selection algorithms to optimize their scalability and performance. Peer-selection methods have been studied extensively in various aspects, including routing mechanisms and communication overhead. However, many state-of-the-art algorithms are oblivious to application-specific data traffic. This mismatch between design and demand results in underutilized connections, which inevitably leads to longer paths and increased latency. In this work, we propose a novel demand-aware peer-selection algorithm, called Binary Search in Buckets (BSB). Our demand-aware approach adheres to a local and greedy XOR-based routing mechanism, ensuring compatibility with existing protocols and mechanisms. We evaluate our solution against two prior algorithms by conducting simulations on real-world and synthetic communication network traces. The results of our evaluations show that BSB can offer up to a 43% improvement compared to two selected algorithms from the literature.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2025

Centroid Approximation with Multidimensional Approximate Agreement Protocols

In this paper, we present distributed fault-tolerant algorithms that approximate the centroid (i.e., the average) of a set of $n$ data points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Our work falls into the broader area of multidimensional Byzantine approximate agreement. We show that state-of-the-art algorithms, such as agreeing inside the convex hull of all non-faulty vectors, or minimum-diameter averaging (MDA), in the worst case either prevent us from agreeing on a vector close to the centroid (in terms of approximation quality), or allow Byzantine parties to influence the output considerably (in terms of validity). To design better approximation algorithms, we propose a novel concept of defining an approximation ratio of the centroid by including the vectors of the Byzantine adversaries in the definition. We analyze the algorithms in the synchronous and asynchronous models of communication with public communication channels. We show that the standard agreement algorithms based on agreeing inside the convex hull of all non-faulty vectors do not allow us to compute a better approximation than $2d$ of the centroid. On the other hand, MDA can be used to achieve constant approximation at the cost of only satisfying strong validity. As a trade-off, we develop an approach that reaches a $2\sqrt{d}$-approximation of the centroid, while satisfying box validity. Our approach provides optimal resilience, allowing up to $t<n/3$ faulty nodes.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Centroid Approximation for Byzantine-Tolerant Federated Learning

Federated learning allows each client to keep its data locally when training machine learning models in a distributed setting. Significant recent research established the requirements that the input must satisfy in order to guarantee convergence of the training loop. This line of work uses averaging as the aggregation rule for the training models. In particular, we are interested in whether federated learning is robust to Byzantine behavior, and observe and investigate a tradeoff between the average/centroid and the validity conditions from distributed computing. We show that the various validity conditions alone do not guarantee a good approximation of the average. Furthermore, we show that reaching good approximation does not give good results in experimental settings due to possible Byzantine outliers. Our main contribution is the first lower bound of $\min\{\frac{n-t}{t},\sqrt{d}\}$ on the centroid approximation under box validity that is often considered in the literature, where $n$ is the number of clients, $t$ the upper bound on the number of Byzantine faults, and $d$ is the dimension of the machine learning model. We complement this lower bound by an upper bound of $2\min\{n,\sqrt{d}\}$, by providing a new analysis for the case $n<d$. In addition, we present a new algorithm that achieves a $\sqrt{2d}$-approximation under convex validity, which also proves that the existing lower bound in the literature is tight. We show that all presented bounds can also be achieved in the distributed peer-to-peer setting. We complement our analytical results with empirical evaluations in federated stochastic gradient descent and federated averaging settings.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Approximate Agreement Algorithms for Byzantine Collaborative Learning

In Byzantine collaborative learning, $n$ clients in a peer-to-peer network collectively learn a model without sharing their data by exchanging and aggregating stochastic gradient estimates. Byzantine clients can prevent others from collecting identical sets of gradient estimates. The aggregation step thus needs to be combined with an efficient (approximate) agreement subroutine to ensure convergence of the training process. In this work, we study the geometric median aggregation rule for Byzantine collaborative learning. We show that known approaches do not provide theoretical guarantees on convergence or gradient quality in the agreement subroutine. To satisfy these theoretical guarantees, we present a hyperbox algorithm for geometric median aggregation. We practically evaluate our algorithm in both centralized and decentralized settings under Byzantine attacks on non-i.i.d. data. We show that our geometric median-based approaches can tolerate sign-flip attacks better than known mean-based approaches from the literature.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

SpiderDAN: Matching Augmentation in Demand-Aware Networks

Graph augmentation is a fundamental and well-studied problem that arises in network optimization. We consider a new variant of this model motivated by reconfigurable communication networks. In this variant, we consider a given physical network and the measured communication demands between the nodes. Our goal is to augment the given physical network with a matching, so that the shortest path lengths in the augmented network, weighted with the demands, are minimal.We prove that this problem is NP-hard, even if the physical network is a cycle. We then use results from demand-aware network design to provide a constant-factor approximation algorithm for adding a matching in case that only a few nodes in the network cause almost all the communication. For general real-world communication patterns, we design and evaluate a series of heuristics that can deal with arbitrary graphs as the underlying network structure. Our algorithms are validated experimentally using real-world traces (from e.g., Facebook) of data centers.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System

Peer review, as a widely used practice to ensure the quality and integrity of publications, lacks a well-defined and common mechanism to self-incentivize virtuous behavior across all the conferences and journals. This is because information about reviewer efforts and author feedback typically remains local to a single venue, while the same group of authors and reviewers participate in the publication process across many venues. Previous attempts to incentivize the reviewing process assume that the quality of reviews and papers authored correlate for the same person, or they assume that the reviewers can receive physical rewards for their work. In this paper, we aim to keep track of reviewing and authoring efforts by users (who review and author) across different venues while ensuring self-incentivization. We show that our system, DecentPeeR, incentivizes reviewers to behave according to the rules, i.e., it has a unique Nash equilibrium in which virtuous behavior is rewarded.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2024

Learning Minimum Linear Arrangement of Cliques and Lines

In the well-known Minimum Linear Arrangement problem (MinLA), the goal is to arrange the nodes of an undirected graph into a permutation so that the total stretch of the edges is minimized. This paper studies an online (learning) variant of MinLA where the graph is not given at the beginning, but rather revealed piece-by-piece. The algorithm starts in a fixed initial permutation, and after a piece of the graph is revealed, the algorithm must update its current permutation to be a MinLA of the subgraph revealed so far. The objective is to minimize the total number of swaps of adjacent nodes as the algorithm updates the permutation. The main result of this paper is an online randomized algorithm that solves this online variant for the restricted cases where the revealed graph is either a collection of cliques or a collection of lines. We show that the algorithm is $8 \ln n$-competitive, where $n$ is the number of nodes of the graph. We complement this result by constructing an asymptotically matching lower bound of $Ω(\ln n)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Locality in online, dynamic, sequential, and distributed graph algorithms

In this work, we give a unifying view of locality in four settings: distributed algorithms, sequential greedy algorithms, dynamic algorithms, and online algorithms. We introduce a new model of computing, called the online-LOCAL model: the adversary reveals the nodes of the input graph one by one, in the same way as in classical online algorithms, but for each new node we get to see its radius-T neighborhood before choosing the output. We compare the online-LOCAL model with three other models: the LOCAL model of distributed computing, where each node produces its output based on its radius-T neighborhood, its sequential counterpart SLOCAL, and the dynamic-LOCAL model, where changes in the dynamic input graph only influence the radius-T neighborhood of the point of change. The SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL models are sandwiched between the LOCAL and online-LOCAL models, with LOCAL being the weakest and online-LOCAL the strongest model. In general, all models are distinct, but we study in particular locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), which is a family of graph problems studied in the context of distributed graph algorithms. We prove that for LCL problems in paths, cycles, and rooted trees, all models are roughly equivalent: the locality of any LCL problem falls in the same broad class - $O(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ - in all four models. In particular, this result enables one to generalize prior lower-bound results from the LOCAL model to all four models, and it also allows one to simulate e.g. dynamic-LOCAL algorithms efficiently in the LOCAL model. We also show that this equivalence does not hold in general bipartite graphs. We provide an online-LOCAL algorithm with locality $O(\log n)$ for the $3$-coloring problem in bipartite graphs - this is a problem with locality $Ω(n^{1/2})$ in the LOCAL model and $Ω(n^{1/10})$ in the SLOCAL model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Mending Partial Solutions with Few Changes

In this paper, we study the notion of mending, i.e. given a partial solution to a graph problem, we investigate how much effort is needed to turn it into a proper solution. For example, if we have a partial coloring of a graph, how hard is it to turn it into a proper coloring? In prior work (SIROCCO 2022), this question was formalized and studied from the perspective of mending radius: if there is a hole that we need to patch, how far do we need to modify the solution? In this work, we investigate a complementary notion of mending volume: how many nodes need to be modified to patch a hole? We focus on the case of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) in trees, and show that already in this setting there are two infinite hierarchies of problems: for infinitely many values $0 < α\le 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(n^α)$, and for infinitely many values $k \ge 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(\log^k n)$. Hence the mendability of LCL problems on trees is a much more fine-grained question than what one would expect based on the mending radius alone. We define three variants of the theme: (1) existential mending volume, i.e., how many nodes need to be modified, (2) expected mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore to find a patch if we use randomness, and (3) deterministic mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore if we use a deterministic algorithm. We show that all three notions are distinct from each other, and we analyze the landscape of the complexities of LCL problems for the respective models.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Local Mending

In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to "patch a hole." We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It is easy to see that $O(1)$-mendable problems are also solvable in $O(\log^* n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. One of the surprises is that in paths and cycles, a converse also holds in the following sense: if a problem $Π$ can be solved in $O(\log^* n)$, there is always a restriction $Π' \subseteq Π$ that is still efficiently solvable but that is also $O(1)$-mendable. We also explore the structure of the landscape of mendability. For example, we show that in trees, the mending radius of any locally checkable problem is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $Θ(n)$, while in general graphs the structure is much more diverse.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2021

Online k-Way Matching with Delays and the H-Metric

In this paper, we study $k$-Way Min-cost Perfect Matching with Delays - the $k$-MPMD problem. This problem considers a metric space with $n$ nodes. Requests arrive at these nodes in an online fashion. The task is to match these requests into sets of exactly $k$, such that the space and time cost of all matched requests are minimized. The notion of the space cost requires a definition of an underlying metric space that gives distances of subsets of $k$ elements. For $k>2$, the task of finding a suitable metric space is at the core of our problem: We show that for some known generalizations to $k=3$ points, such as the $2$-metric and the $D$-metric, there exists no competitive randomized algorithm for the $3$-MPMD problem. The $G$-metrics are defined for 3 points and allows for a competitive algorithm for the $3$-MPMD problem. For $k>3$ points, there exist two generalizations of the $G$-metrics known as $n$- and $K$-metrics. We show that neither the $n$-metrics nor the $K$-metrics can be used for the $k$-MPMD problem. On the positive side, we introduce the $H$-metrics, the first metrics to allow for a solution of the $k$-MPMD problem for all $k$. In order to devise an online algorithm for the $k$-MPMD problem on the $H$-metrics, we embed the $H$-metric into trees with an $O(\log n)$ distortion. Based on this embedding result, we extend the algorithm proposed by Azar et al. (2017) and achieve a competitive ratio of $O(\log n)$ for the $k$-MPMD problem.

cs.DS↗