David A. C. Beck | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development

In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents. Layered on top, an open-source RSE-Plugins ecosystem encodes accumulated RSE knowledge as a Plugin-Agent-Skill hierarchy spanning scientific Python practice, domain-specific knowledge, a six-phase research-and-implement workflow, and project lifecycle management. Scientific software is judged less by raw code quality than by whether it can be cited, audited, reproduced, and extended. Off-the-shelf AI coding agents, optimized against commercial software benchmarks, are poorly calibrated for this setting: they ignore the conventions of the scientific Python libraries they invoke, mishandle sensitive or embargoed data, and leave decision trails that are difficult to reconstruct after the fact. We report on twenty months of practice at a university-based research software engineering (RSE) center, where RSEs embedded across astronomy, earth and climate science, agriculture, and health projects worked to close this gap. We characterize the recurring infrastructure, governance, and process challenges of adopting Agentic AI inside a multi-domain RSE center, describe the platform and plugin design, and distill operational lessons from real scientific software deployments. Together, the platform and plugins shift AI coding agents from generic code generators into domain-aware collaborators that respect community norms and produce auditable provenance of technical reasoning.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

Principles of the Battery Data Genome

Electrochemical energy storage is central to modern society -- from consumer electronics to electrified transportation and the power grid. It is no longer just a convenience but a critical enabler of the transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy. The large pluralistic battery research and development community serving these needs has evolved into diverse specialties spanning materials discovery, battery chemistry, design innovation, scale-up, manufacturing and deployment. Despite the maturity and the impact of battery science and technology, the data and software practices among these disparate groups are far behind the state-of-the-art in other fields (e.g. drug discovery), which have enjoyed significant increases in the rate of innovation. Incremental performance gains and lost research productivity, which are the consequences, retard innovation and societal progress. Examples span every field of battery research , from the slow and iterative nature of materials discovery, to the repeated and time-consuming performance testing of cells and the mitigation of degradation and failures. The fundamental issue is that modern data science methods require large amounts of data and the battery community lacks the requisite scalable, standardized data hubs required for immediate use of these approaches. Lack of uniform data practices is a central barrier to the scale problem. In this perspective we identify the data- and software-sharing gaps and propose the unifying principles and tools needed to build a robust community of data hubs, which provide flexible sharing formats to address diverse needs. The Battery Data Genome is offered as a data-centric initiative that will enable the transformative acceleration of battery science and technology, and will ultimately serve as a catalyst to revolutionize our approach to innovation.

physics.soc-ph↗