SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

David A. Edwards

Publications and source records attributed to David A. Edwards.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Transport Effects on Multiple-Component Reactions in Optical Biosensors

Optical biosensors are often used to measure kinetic rate constants associated with chemical reactions. Such instruments operate in the \textit{surface-volume} configuration, in which ligand molecules are convected through a fluid-filled volume over a surface to which receptors are confined. Currently, scientists are using optical biosenors to measure the kinetic rate constants associated with DNA translesion synthesis--a process critical to DNA damage repair. Biosensor experiments to study this process involve multiple interacting components on the sensor surface. This multiple-component biosensor experiment is modeled with a set of nonlinear integrodifferential equations (IDEs). It is shown that in physically relevant asymptotic limits these equations reduce to a much simpler set of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). To verify the validity of our ODE approximation, a numerical method for the IDE system is developed and studied. Results from the ODE model agree with simulations of the IDE model, rendering our ODE model useful for parameter estimation.

q-bio.MN

Applications of fractional calculus in solving Abel-type integral equations: Surface-volume reaction problem

In this paper we consider a class of partial integro-differential equations of fractional order, motivated by an equation which arises as a result of modeling surface-volume reactions in optical biosensors. We solve these equations by employing techniques from fractional calculus; several examples are discussed. Furthermore, for the first time, we encounter an order of the fractional derivative other than $\frac{1}{2}$ in an applied problem. Hence, in this paper we explore the applicability of fractional calculus in real-world applications, further strengthening the true nature of fractional calculus.

math.CA

Unity, Disunity and Pluralism in Science

We discuss the problems of consensus and unity in science. The natural sciences seem to contrast with many other areas of endeavor in that a high level of consensus seems to exist in them. However, a careful analysis of the structure of particular physical theories,such as those concerned with electrons, shows that there is great heterogeneity of both theory and methodology. We argue that the natural science community tends to be tolerant of diversity. We contrast this tolerance among natural scientists with the more overt disagreement occurring in the social sciences and humanities. Our central theme is that many intellectual problems arise from straining too hard to make a successful perspective into a total worldview.

physics.hist-ph