arXiv subjects

David A. Hirshberg

Publications and source records attributed to David A. Hirshberg.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

A Stable and Efficient Covariate-Balancing Estimator for Causal Survival Effects

We propose an empirically stable and asymptotically efficient covariate-balancing approach to the problem of estimating survival causal effects in data with conditionally-independent censoring. This addresses a challenge often encountered in state-of-the-art nonparametric methods: the use of inverses of small estimated probabilities and the resulting amplification of estimation error. We validate our theoretical results in experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic data.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

The Balancing Act in Causal Inference

The idea of covariate balance is at the core of causal inference. Inverse propensity weights play a central role because they are the unique set of weights that balance the covariate distributions of different treatment groups. We discuss two broad approaches to estimating these weights: the more traditional one, which fits a propensity score model and then uses the reciprocal of the estimated propensity score to construct weights, and the balancing approach, which estimates the inverse propensity weights essentially by the method of moments, finding weights that achieve balance in the sample. We review ideas from the causal inference, sample surveys, and semiparametric estimation literatures, with particular attention to the role of balance as a sufficient condition for robust inference. We focus on the inverse propensity weighting and augmented inverse propensity weighting estimators for the average treatment effect given strong ignorability and consider generalizations for a broader class of problems including policy evaluation and the estimation of individualized treatment effects.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Synthetic Difference in Differences

We present a new estimator for causal effects with panel data that builds on insights behind the widely used difference in differences and synthetic control methods. Relative to these methods we find, both theoretically and empirically, that this "synthetic difference in differences" estimator has desirable robustness properties, and that it performs well in settings where the conventional estimators are commonly used in practice. We study the asymptotic behavior of the estimator when the systematic part of the outcome model includes latent unit factors interacted with latent time factors, and we present conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Bandits

It has become increasingly common for data to be collected adaptively, for example using contextual bandits. Historical data of this type can be used to evaluate other treatment assignment policies to guide future innovation or experiments. However, policy evaluation is challenging if the target policy differs from the one used to collect data, and popular estimators, including doubly robust (DR) estimators, can be plagued by bias, excessive variance, or both. In particular, when the pattern of treatment assignment in the collected data looks little like the pattern generated by the policy to be evaluated, the importance weights used in DR estimators explode, leading to excessive variance. In this paper, we improve the DR estimator by adaptively weighting observations to control its variance. We show that a t-statistic based on our improved estimator is asymptotically normal under certain conditions, allowing us to form confidence intervals and test hypotheses. Using synthetic data and public benchmarks, we provide empirical evidence for our estimator's improved accuracy and inferential properties relative to existing alternatives.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Least Squares with Error in Variables

Error-in-variables regression is a common ingredient in treatment effect estimators using panel data. This includes synthetic control estimators, counterfactual time series forecasting estimators, and combinations. We study high-dimensional least squares with correlated error-in-variables with a focus on these uses. We use our results to derive conditions under which the synthetic control estimator is asymptotically unbiased and normal with estimable variance, permitting inference without assuming time-stationarity, unit-exchangeability, or the absence of weak factors. These results hold in an asymptotic regime in which the number of pre-treatment periods goes to infinity and the number of control units can be much larger $(p \gg n)$.

math.ST↗

arXiv2021

Minimax Linear Estimation of the Retargeted Mean

Evaluating treatments received by one population for application to a different target population of scientific interest is a central problem in causal inference from observational studies. We study the minimax linear estimator of the treatment-specific mean outcome on a target population and provide a theoretical basis for inference based on it. In particular, we provide a justification for the common practice of ignoring bias when building confidence intervals with these linear estimators. Focusing on the case that the class of the unknown outcome function is the unit ball of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, we show that the resulting linear estimator is asymptotically optimal under conditions only marginally stronger than those used with augmented estimators. We establish bounds attesting to the estimator's good finite sample properties. In an extensive simulation study, we observe promising performance of the estimator throughout a wide range of sample sizes, noise levels, and levels of overlap between the covariate distributions of the treated and target populations.

math.ST↗

arXiv2021

Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experiments

Adaptive experiment designs can dramatically improve statistical efficiency in randomized trials, but they also complicate statistical inference. For example, it is now well known that the sample mean is biased in adaptive trials. Inferential challenges are exacerbated when our parameter of interest differs from the parameter the trial was designed to target, such as when we are interested in estimating the value of a sub-optimal treatment after running a trial to determine the optimal treatment using a stochastic bandit design. In this context, typical estimators that use inverse propensity weighting to eliminate sampling bias can be problematic: their distributions become skewed and heavy-tailed as the propensity scores decay to zero. In this paper, we present a class of estimators that overcome these issues. Our approach is to adaptively reweight the terms of an augmented inverse propensity weighting estimator to control the contribution of each term to the estimator's variance. This adaptive weighting scheme prevents estimates from becoming heavy-tailed, ensuring asymptotically correct coverage. It also reduces variance, allowing us to test hypotheses with greater power - especially hypotheses that were not targeted by the experimental design. We validate the accuracy of the resulting estimates and their confidence intervals in numerical experiments and show our methods compare favorably to existing alternatives in terms of RMSE and coverage.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2020

Augmented Minimax Linear Estimation

Many statistical estimands can expressed as continuous linear functionals of a conditional expectation function. This includes the average treatment effect under unconfoundedness and generalizations for continuous-valued and personalized treatments. In this paper, we discuss a general approach to estimating such quantities: we begin with a simple plug-in estimator based on an estimate of the conditional expectation function, and then correct the plug-in estimator by subtracting a minimax linear estimate of its error. We show that our method is semiparametrically efficient under weak conditions and observe promising performance on both real and simulated data.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2018

Debiased Inference of Average Partial Effects in Single-Index Models

We propose a method for average partial effect estimation in high-dimensional single-index models that is root-n-consistent and asymptotically unbiased given sparsity assumptions on the underlying regression model. This note was prepared as a comment on Wooldridge and Zhu [2018], forthcoming in the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.

math.ST↗