SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

David Agost-Beltran

Publications and source records attributed to David Agost-Beltran.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

On the RAID dataset of perceptual responses: analysis and statistical causes

This work analyzes the RAID dataset to evaluate human responses to affine image distortions, including rotation, translation, scaling, and Gaussian noise. Using Mean Squared Error (MSE), the study establishes human detection thresholds for these distortions, enabling comparison across types. Statistical analysis with ANOVA and Tukey Kramer tests reveals that observers are significantly more sensitive to Gaussian noise, which consistently produced the lowest detection thresholds. Fourier analysis further shows that high-frequency components act as a visual mask for Gaussian noise, demonstrating a strong correlation between high frequency energy and detection thresholds. Additionally, spectral orientation influences the perception of rotation. Finally, the study employs the PixelCNN model to show that image probability significantly correlates with detection thresholds for most distortions, suggesting that statistical likelihood affects human visual tolerance.

q-bio.NC

RAID-Database: human Responses to Affine Image Distortions

Image quality databases are used to train models for predicting subjective human perception. However, most existing databases focus on distortions commonly found in digital media and not in natural conditions. Affine transformations are particularly relevant to study, as they are among the most commonly encountered by human observers in everyday life. This Data Descriptor presents a set of human responses to suprathreshold affine image transforms (rotation, translation, scaling) and Gaussian noise as convenient reference to compare with previously existing image quality databases. The responses were measured using well established psychophysics: the Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method. The set contains responses to 864 distorted images. The experiments involved 105 observers and more than 20000 comparisons of quadruples of images. The quality of the dataset is ensured because (a) it reproduces the classical Piéron's law, (b) it reproduces classical absolute detection thresholds, and (c) it is consistent with conventional image quality databases but improves them according to Group-MAD experiments.

cs.CV