Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

David Fernández-Bretón

Publications and source records attributed to David Fernández-Bretón.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Finitely additive measures on $\mathbb Z$ and additive combinatorics

We study (bounded) finitely additive measures on the group of integers $\mathbb Z$, as elements of the Banach algebra $\mathrm{ba}(\mathbb Z)$, viewed as a natural generalization of ultrafilters. The algebraic structure of $\mathrm{ba}(\mathbb Z)$ extends the semigroup structure of the Čech--Stone compactification, allowing methods from ultrafilter theory to be applied in a broader measure-theoretic setting. We investigate idempotent finitely additive measures and establish additive properties of subsets of $\mathbb Z$ having positive measure. We then proceed to study almost translation-invariant and translation-invariant finitely additive measures, showing that these stronger notions yield correspondingly stronger additive conclusions. In particular, we prove that every subset of $\mathbb Z$ whose measure exceeds a certain explicit threshold necessarily is an $\mathsf{IP}_{n}$-set; with stronger properties and lower thresholds depending on the properties of the relevant measures. Several examples illustrating the sharpness and limitations of the results are also presented, together with a discussion of open problems and directions for future research.

math.LO↗

Q-points, selective ultrafilters, and idempotents, with an application to choiceless set theory

We study ultrafilters from the perspective of the algebra in the Čech-Stone compactification of the natural numbers, and idempotent elements therein. The first two results that we prove establish that, if $p$ is a Q-point (resp. a selective ultrafilter) and $\mathscr F^p$ (resp. $\mathscr G^p$) is the smallest family containing $p$ and closed under iterated sums (resp. closed under Blass--Frol\'ık sums and Rudin--Keisler images), then $\mathscr F^p$ (resp. $\mathscr G^p$) contains no idempotent elements. The second of these results about a selective ultrafilter has the following interesting consequence: assuming a conjecture of Blass, in models of the form $\mathbf{L}(\mathbb R)[p]$ where $\mathbf{L}(\mathbb R)$ is a Solovay model (of $\mathsf{ZF}$ without choice) and $p$ is a selective ultrafilter, there are no idempotent elements. In particular, the theory $\mathsf{ZF}$ plus the existence of a nonprincipal ultrafilter on $ω$ does not imply the existence of idempotent ultrafilters, which answers a question of DiNasso and Tachtsis (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146, 397-411). Following the line of obtaining independence results in $\mathsf{ZF}$, we finish the paper by proving that $\mathsf{ZF}$ plus "every additive filter can be extended to an idempotent ultrafilter" does not imply the Ultrafilter Theorem over $\mathbb R$, answering another question of DiNasso and Tachtsis from the same paper.

math.LO↗

Ends of non-metrizable manifolds: a generalized bagpipe theorem

We initiate the study of ends of non-metrizable manifolds and introduce the notion of short and long ends. Using the theory developed, we provide a characterization of (non-metrizable) surfaces that can be written as the topological sum of a metrizable manifold plus a countable number of "long pipes" in terms of their spaces of ends; this is a direct generalization of Nyikos's bagpipe theorem.

math.GN↗

Equicontinuous mappings on finite trees

If $X$ is a finite tree and $f \colon X \longrightarrow X$ is a map, as the Main Theorem of this paper we find eight conditions, each of which is equivalent to the fact that $f$ is equicontinuous. To name just a few of the results obtained: the equicontinuity of $f$ is equivalent to the fact that there is no arc $A \subseteq X$ satisfying $A \subsetneq f^n[A]$ for some $n\in \mathbb{N}$. It is also equivalent to the fact that for some nonprincial ultrafilter $u$, the function $f^u \colon X \longrightarrow X$ is continuous (in other words, failure of equicontinuity of $f$ is equivalent to the failure of continuity of $every$ element of the Ellis remainder $g\in E(X,f)^*$). One of the tools used in the proofs is the Ramsey-theoretic result known as Hindman's theorem. Our results generalize the ones shown by Vidal-Escobar and García-Ferreira, and complement those of Bruckner and Ceder, Mai, and Camargo, Rincón and Uzcátegui.

math.GN↗

Hindman-like theorems with uncountably many colours and finite monochromatic sets

A particular case of the Hindman--Galvin--Glazer theorem states that, for every partition of an infinite abelian group $G$ into two cells, there will be an infinite $X\subseteq G$ such that the set of its finite sums $\{x_1+\cdots+x_n\big|n\in\mathbb N\wedge x_1,\ldots,x_n\in X\text{ are distinct}\}$ is monochromatic. It is known that the same statement is false, in a very strong sense, if one attempts to obtain an uncountable (rather than just infinite) $X$. On the other hand, a recent result of Komjáth states that, for partitions into uncountably many cells, it is possible to obtain monochromatic sets of the form $\mathrm{FS}(X)$, for $X$ of some prescribed finite size, when working with sufficiently large Boolean groups. In this paper, we provide a generalization of Komjáth's result, and we show that, in a sense, this generalization is the strongest possible.

math.LO↗

A Characterization of the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem in Terms of Forcing Notions

For certain weak versions of the Axiom of Choice (most notably, the Boolean Prime Ideal theorem), we obtain equivalent formulations in terms of partial orders, and filter-like objects within them intersecting certain dense sets or antichains. This allows us to prove some consequences of the Boolean Prime Ideal theorem using arguments in the style of those that use Zorn's Lemma, or Martin's Axiom.

math.LO↗

A parametrized diamond principle and union ultrafilters

We consider a cardinal invariant closely related to Hindman's theorem. We prove that this cardinal invariant is small in the iterated Sacks perfect set forcing model, and that its corresponding parametrized diamond principle implies the existence of union ultrafilters. As a corollary, this establishes the existence of union ultrafilters in the iterated Sacks model of Set Theory.

math.LO↗

Gruff Ultrafilters

We investigate the question of whether $\mathbb Q$ carries an ultrafilter generated by perfect sets (such ultrafilters were called gruff ultrafilters by van Douwen). We prove that one can (consistently) obtain an affirmative answer to this question in three different ways: by assuming a certain parametrized diamond principle, from the cardinal invariant equality $\mathfrak d=\mathfrak c$, and in the Random real model. [Edit: replace "the Randor real model" with "the model obtained by adding $ω_1$ Cohen reals to a model of $\mathsf{CH}$, and subsequently forcing with the Random algebra"; this is clarified in the corrigendum attached at the end of the paper.]

math.LO↗

Strong failures of higher analogs of Hindman's theorem

We show that various analogs of Hindman's Theorem fail in a strong sense when one attempts to obtain uncountable monochromatic sets: Theorem 1: There exists a colouring $c:\mathbb R\rightarrow\mathbb Q$, such that for every $X\subseteq\mathbb R$ with $|X|=|\mathbb R|$, and every colour $γ\in\mathbb Q$, there are two distinct elements $x_0,x_1$ of $X$ for which $c(x_0+x_1)=γ$. This forms a simultaneous generalization of a theorem of Hindman, Leader and Strauss and a theorem of Galvin and Shelah. Theorem 2: For every Abelian group $G$, there exists a colouring $c:G\rightarrow\mathbb Q$ such that for every uncountable $X\subseteq G$, and every colour $γ$, for some large enough integer $n$, there are pairwise distinct elements $x_0,\ldots,x_n$ of $X$ such that $c(x_0+\cdots+x_n)=γ$. In addition, it is consistent that the preceding statement remains valid even after enlarging the set of colours from $\mathbb Q$ to $\mathbb R$. Theorem 3: Let $\circledast_κ$ assert that for every Abelian group $G$ of cardinality $κ$, there exists a colouring $c:G\rightarrow G$ such that for every positive integer $n$, every $X_0,\ldots,X_n \in[G]^κ$, and every $γ\in G$, there are $x_0\in X_0,\ldots, x_n\in X_n$ such that $c(x_0+\cdots+x_n)=γ$. Then $\circledast_κ$ holds for unboundedly many uncountable cardinals $κ$, and it is consistent that $\circledast_κ$ holds for all regular uncountable cardinals $κ$.

math.LO↗