arXiv subjects

David Kaber

Publications and source records attributed to David Kaber.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ethical Asymmetry in Human-Robot Interaction - An Empirical Test of Sparrow's Hypothesis

The ethics of human-robot interaction (HRI) have been discussed extensively based on three traditional frameworks: deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. We conducted a mixed within/between experiment to investigate Sparrow's proposed ethical asymmetry hypothesis in human treatment of robots. The moral permissibility of action (MPA) was manipulated as a subject grouping variable, and virtue type (prudence, justice, courage, and temperance) was controlled as a within-subjects factor. We tested moral stimuli using an online questionnaire with Perceived Moral Permissibility of Action (PMPA) and Perceived Virtue Scores (PVS) as response measures. The PVS measure was based on an adaptation of the established Questionnaire on Cardinal Virtues (QCV), while the PMPA was based on Malle et al. [39] work. We found that the MPA significantly influenced the PMPA and perceived virtue scores. The best-fitting model to describe the relationship between PMPA and PVS was cubic, which is symmetrical in nature. Our study did not confirm Sparrow's asymmetry hypothesis. The adaptation of the QCV is expected to have utility for future studies, pending additional psychometric property assessments.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

People Perceive More Phantom Costs From Autonomous Agents When They Make Unreasonably Generous Offers

People often reject offers that are too generous due to the perception of hidden drawbacks referred to as "phantom costs." We hypothesized that this perception and the decision-making vary based on the type of agent making the offer (human vs. robot) and the degree to which the agent is perceived to be autonomous or have the capacity for self-interest. To test this conjecture, participants (N = 855) engaged in a car-buying simulation where a human or robot sales agent, described as either autonomous or not, offered either a small (5%) or large (85%) discount. Results revealed that the robot was perceived as less self-interested than the human, which reduced the perception of phantom costs. While larger discounts increased phantom costs, they also increased purchase intentions, suggesting that perceived benefits can outweigh phantom costs. Importantly, phantom costs were not only attributed to the agent participants interacted with, but also to the product and the agent's manager, highlighting at least three sources of suspicion. These findings deepen our understanding of to whom people assign responsibility and how perceptions shape both human-human and human-robot interactions, with implications for ethical AI design and marketing strategies.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

A Rigorous Turing Test: a Foundation for Evaluating Artificial General Intelligence

Several studies claim that large language models have passed the Turing Test and hence can "think", yet none follow Turing's original instructions precisely. Passing the test holds significance as evidence that a machine demonstrates human-like intelligence, and as a marker for artificial-general intelligence in commercial and legal domains. We conducted Turing's three-player imitation game with an LLM by following the guidelines identified by Turing and applying scientific standards wherever detailed instructions were missing. We performed a computer-imitates-human game without duration constraints and a man-imitates-woman game as a benchmark. In the computer-imitates-human game, only one participant misidentified the large language model, indicating that claims of large language models' passing the Turing test are premature. Participants required over five minutes for both tasks, with the man-imitates-woman game taking longer; shorter time limits elsewhere may explain earlier positive results. We expect the Turing Test to remain central in assessing machine intelligence for years to come.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

AdaptiveCoPilot: Design and Testing of a NeuroAdaptive LLM Cockpit Guidance System in both Novice and Expert Pilots

Pilots operating modern cockpits often face high cognitive demands due to complex interfaces and multitasking requirements, which can lead to overload and decreased performance. This study introduces AdaptiveCoPilot, a neuroadaptive guidance system that adapts visual, auditory, and textual cues in real time based on the pilot's cognitive workload, measured via functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). A formative study with expert pilots (N=3) identified adaptive rules for modality switching and information load adjustments during preflight tasks. These insights informed the design of AdaptiveCoPilot, which integrates cognitive state assessments, behavioral data, and adaptive strategies within a context-aware Large Language Model (LLM). The system was evaluated in a virtual reality (VR) simulated cockpit with licensed pilots (N=8), comparing its performance against baseline and random feedback conditions. The results indicate that the pilots using AdaptiveCoPilot exhibited higher rates of optimal cognitive load states on the facets of working memory and perception, along with reduced task completion times. Based on the formative study, experimental findings, qualitative interviews, we propose a set of strategies for future development of neuroadaptive pilot guidance systems and highlight the potential of neuroadaptive systems to enhance pilot performance and safety in aviation environments.

cs.HC↗