arXiv subjects

David L. Borchers

Publications and source records attributed to David L. Borchers.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Capture history analysis for spatial wildlife surveys with detection times

Many wildlife surveys of species with individually identifiable animals are based on the analysis of the capture histories of individual animals. However, not many of these take account of both the animals' capture times and their capture locations. In this work, we develop a maximum likelihood estimator for surveys of individually identifiable animals using proximity detectors, multi-catch traps, single-catch traps, and traps that remove animals from the population, when capture times are known. We do this using the counting process theory at the foundation of event history (or survival) analysis. The work provides a unifying framework for such surveys, resolves open problems for single-catch traps and removal surveys, and introduces a new statistical method for multi-catch traps. We test the new methods by simulation and we present an analysis of possums in New Zealand caught with single-catch traps.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Spatial Capture-Recapture With Penalized Regression Splines to Flexibly Model Wildlife Density and Distribution

Spatial capture-recapture models are routinely used to estimate the abundance and distribution of wild animal populations and involve a latent spatial point process of animal activity centres that describes the spatial distribution of individuals. While traditional spatial capture-recapture models use a Poisson process, the assumption of conditional independence between points is often violated in practice due to factors not included in the point process, such as social clustering, territoriality, or preferential selection of habitat due to unobserved covariates. Log-Gaussian Cox processes are commonly used in spatial statistics to overcome weaknesses of Poisson processes, but methods to fit them within spatial capture-recapture do not currently exist. Here, we present a spatial capture-recapture framework that allows for the use of penalized regression splines to describe the activity centre distribution, with model fitting via a Laplace-approximate penalized marginal maximum likelihood approach. Our method approximates using a log-Gaussian Cox process for activity centres, and allows flexible modelling of nonlinear effect of covariates on density. We illustrate the use of our method with a simulation study and two case-studies. We demonstrate that, while population size estimates of traditional approaches are robust to density model misspecification, our approach substantially improves the estimation of spatial animal distributions.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Approximate Maximum Likelihood Inference for Acoustic Spatial Capture-Recapture with Unknown Identities, Using Monte Carlo Expectation Maximization

Acoustic spatial capture-recapture (ASCR) surveys with an array of synchronized acoustic detectors can be an effective way of estimating animal density or call density. However, constructing the capture histories required for ASCR analysis is challenging, as recognizing which detections at different detectors are of which calls is not a trivial task. Because calls from different distances take different times to arrive at detectors, the order in which calls are detected is not necessarily the same as the order in which they are made, and without knowing which detections are of the same call, we do not know how many different calls are detected. We propose a Monte Carlo expectation-maximization (MCEM) estimation method to resolve this unknown call identity problem. To implement the MCEM method in this context, we sample the latent variables from a complete-data likelihood model in the expectation step and use a semi-complete-data likelihood or conditional likelihood in the maximization step. We use a parametric bootstrap to obtain confidence intervals. When we apply our method to a survey of moss frogs, it gives an estimate within 15% of the estimate obtained using data with call capture histories constructed by experts, and unlike this latter estimate, our confidence interval incorporates the uncertainty about call identities. Simulations show it to have a low bias (6%) and coverage probabilities close to the nominal 95% value.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Exact Likelihoods for N-mixture models with Time-to-Detection Data

This paper is concerned with the formulation of $N$-mixture models for estimating the abundance and probability of detection of a species from binary response, count and time-to-detection data. A modelling framework, which encompasses time-to-first-detection within the context of detection/non-detection and time-to-each-detection and time-to-first-detection within the context of count data, is introduced. Two observation processes which depend on whether or not double counting is assumed to occur are also considered. The main focus of the paper is on the derivation of explicit forms for the likelihoods associated with each of the proposed models. Closed-form expressions for the likelihoods associated with time-to-detection data are new and are developed from the theory of order statistics. A key finding of the study is that, based on the assumption of no double counting, the likelihoods associated with times-to-detection together with count data are the product of the likelihood for the counts alone and a term which depends on the detection probability parameter. This result demonstrates that, in this case, recording times-to-detection could well improve precision in estimation over recording counts alone. In contrast, for the double counting protocol with exponential arrival times, no information was found to be gained by recording times-to-detection in addition to the count data. An R package and an accompanying vignette are also introduced in order to complement the algebraic results and to demonstrate the use of the models in practice.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Towards Automated Animal Density Estimation with Acoustic Spatial Capture-Recapture

Passive acoustic monitoring can be an effective way of monitoring wildlife populations that are acoustically active but difficult to survey visually. Digital recorders allow surveyors to gather large volumes of data at low cost, but identifying target species vocalisations in these data is non-trivial. Machine learning (ML) methods are often used to do the identification. They can process large volumes of data quickly, but they do not detect all vocalisations and they do generate some false positives (vocalisations that are not from the target species). Existing wildlife abundance survey methods have been designed specifically to deal with the first of these mistakes, but current methods of dealing with false positives are not well-developed. They do not take account of features of individual vocalisations, some of which are more likely to be false positives than others. We propose three methods for acoustic spatial capture-recapture inference that integrate individual-level measures of confidence from ML vocalisation identification into the likelihood and hence integrate ML uncertainty into inference. The methods include a mixture model in which species identity is a latent variable. We test the methods by simulation and find that in a scenario based on acoustic data from Hainan gibbons, in which ignoring false positives results in 17% positive bias, our methods give negligible bias and coverage probabilities that are close to the nominal 95% level.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2020

Uncovering ecological state dynamics with hidden Markov models

Ecological systems can often be characterised by changes among a finite set of underlying states pertaining to individuals, populations, communities, or entire ecosystems through time. Owing to the inherent difficulty of empirical field studies, ecological state dynamics operating at any level of this hierarchy can often be unobservable or "hidden". Ecologists must therefore often contend with incomplete or indirect observations that are somehow related to these underlying processes. By formally disentangling state and observation processes based on simple yet powerful mathematical properties that can be used to describe many ecological phenomena, hidden Markov models (HMMs) can facilitate inferences about complex system state dynamics that might otherwise be intractable. However, while HMMs are routinely applied in other disciplines, they have only recently begun to gain traction within the broader ecological community. We provide a gentle introduction to HMMs, establish some common terminology, and review the immense scope of HMMs for applied ecological research. We also provide a supplemental tutorial on some of the more technical aspects of HMM implementation and interpretation. By illustrating how practitioners can use a simple conceptual template to customise HMMs for their specific systems of interest, revealing methodological links between existing applications, and highlighting some practical considerations and limitations of these approaches, our goal is to help establish HMMs as a fundamental inferential tool for ecologists.

q-bio.QM↗