arXiv subjects

David Meister

Publications and source records attributed to David Meister.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Current trends and future directions in event-based control

The defining characteristic of event-based control is that feedback loops are only closed when indicated by a triggering condition that takes recent information about the system into account. This stands in contrast to periodic control where the feedback loop is closed periodically. Benefits of event-based control arise when sampling comes at a cost, which occurs, e.g., for Networked Control Systems or in other setups with resource constraints. A rapidly growing number of publications deals with event-based control. Nevertheless, some fundamental questions about event-based control are still unsolved. In this article, we provide an overview of current research trends in event-based control. We focus on results that aim for a better understanding of effects that occur in feedback loops with event-based control. Based on this summary, we identify important open directions for future research.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2025

Path-following model predictive control for autonomous e-scooters

In order to mitigate economical, ecological, and societal challenges in electric scooter (e-scooter) sharing systems, we develop an autonomous e-scooter prototype. Our vision is to design a fully autonomous prototype that can find its way to the next parking spot, high-demand area, or charging station. In this work, we propose a path-following model predictive control solution to enable localization and navigation in an urban environment with a provided path to follow. We design a closed-loop architecture that solves the localization and path following problem while allowing the e-scooter to maintain its balance with a previously developed reaction wheel mechanism. Our model predictive control approach facilitates state and input constraints, e.g., adhering to the path width, while remaining executable on a Raspberry Pi 5. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach in a real-world experiment on our prototype.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2025

On the effects of angular acceleration in orientation estimation using inertial measurement units

In this paper, we analyze the orientation estimation problem using inertial measurement units. Many estimation algorithms suffer degraded performance when accelerations other than gravity affect the accelerometer. We show that linear accelerations resulting from rotational accelerations cannot be treated as external disturbance to be attenuated, rather, they change the dynamic behavior of the filter itself. In particular, this results in the introduction of additional zeros in the linearized transfer functions. These zeros lead to nonminimum phase behavior, which is known to be challenging for control. We validate these findings experimentally. Further, we demonstrate that Mahony and Madgwick filters can attenuate the acceleration at the expense of reduced bandwidth. In addition, we show that validation schemes based on precollected data fail to capture these closed-loop effects accurately.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2024

How improving performance may imply losing consistency in event-triggered consensus

Event-triggered control is often argued to lower the average triggering rate compared to time-triggered control while still achieving a desired control goal, e.g., the same performance level. However, this property, often called consistency, cannot be taken for granted and can be hard to analyze in many settings. In particular, the performance properties of decentralized event-triggered control schemes with respect to time-triggered control remain mostly unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we examine these performance properties for a consensus problem considering single-integrator agent dynamics, a level-triggering rule, and a complete communication graph. We consider the long-term average quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure. For this setting, we show that enriching the information the local controllers use improves the performance of the consensus algorithm but renders a previously consistent event-triggered control scheme inconsistent. In addition, we do so while deploying optimal control inputs which we derive for both information cases and triggering schemes. With this insight, we can furthermore explain the relationship between two seemingly contrasting consistency results from the literature.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2024

Collision Avoidance Safety Filter for an Autonomous E-Scooter using Ultrasonic Sensors

In this paper, we propose a collision avoidance safety filter for autonomous electric scooters to enable safe operation of such vehicles in pedestrian areas. In particular, we employ multiple low-cost ultrasonic sensors to detect a wide range of possible obstacles in front of the e-scooter. Based on possibly faulty distance measurements, we design a filter to mitigate measurement noise and missing values as well as a gain-scheduled controller to limit the velocity commanded to the e-scooter when required due to imminent collisions. The proposed controller structure is able to prevent collisions with unknown obstacles by deploying a reduced safe velocity ensuring a sufficiently large safety distance. The collision avoidance approach is designed such that it may be easily deployed in similar applications of general micromobility vehicles. The effectiveness of our proposed safety filter is demonstrated in real-world experiments.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2023

Performance implications of different $p$-norms in level-triggered sampling

This work studies the performance of an event-based control approach, namely level-triggered sampling, in a standard multidimensional single-integrator setup. We falsify a conjecture from the literature that the deployed $p$-norm in the triggering condition supposedly has no impact on the performance of the sampling scheme in that setting. In particular, we show for the considered setup that the usage of the maximum norm instead of the Euclidean norm induces a performance deterioration of level-triggered sampling for sufficiently large system dimensions, when compared to periodic control at the same sampling rate. Moreover, we investigate the performance for other $p$-norms in simulation and observe that it degrades with increasing $p$. In addition, our findings reveal the previously unknown role of the triggering rule in the cause of a recently discovered phenomenon: Previous work has shown for a single-integrator consensus setup that the commonly observed performance advantage of event-based control over periodic control can be lost in distributed settings with a cooperative control goal. In our work, we obtain similar results for a non-cooperative setting only by adjusting the norm in the level-triggered sampling scheme. We therefore demonstrate that the performance degradation found in the distributed setting originates from the triggering rule and not from the considered cooperative control goal.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2023

Time- versus event-triggered consensus of a single-integrator multi-agent system

Event-triggered control has shown the potential for providing improved control performance at the same average sampling rate when compared to time-triggered control. While this observation motivates numerous event-triggered control schemes, proving it from a theoretical perspective has only been achieved for a limited number of settings. Inspired by existing performance analyses for the single-loop case, we provide a first fundamental performance comparison of time- and event-triggered control in a multi-agent consensus setting. For this purpose, we consider undirected connected network topologies without communication delays, a level-triggering rule for event-triggered control, and the long-term average of the quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure. The main finding of our analysis is that time-triggered control provably outperforms event-triggered control beyond a certain number of agents in our particular setting. We thereby provide an illustrative distributed problem setup in which event-triggered control results in a performance disadvantage when compared to time-triggered control in the case of large networks. Moreover, we derive the asymptotic order of the performance measure under both triggering schemes which gives more insights into the cost relationship for large numbers of agents. Thus, by presenting an analysis for a particular setup, this work points out that transferring an event-triggering scheme from the single-loop to the multi-agent setting can lead to a loss of the often presumed superiority of event-triggered control over time-triggered control. In particular, the design of performant decentralized event-triggering schemes can therefore pose additional challenges when compared to the analogue single-loop case.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2022

Shared Network Effects in Time- versus Event-Triggered Consensus of a Single-Integrator Multi-Agent System

Event-triggered control has the potential to provide a similar performance level as time-triggered (periodic) control while triggering events less frequently. It therefore appears intuitive that it is also a viable approach for distributed systems to save scarce shared network resources used for inter-agent communication. While this motivation is commonly used also for multi-agent systems, a theoretical analysis of the impact of network effects on the performance of event- and time-triggered control for such distributed systems is currently missing. With this paper, we contrast event- and time-triggered control performance for a single-integrator consensus problem under consideration of a shared communication medium. We therefore incorporate transmission delays and packet loss in our analysis and compare the triggering scheme performance under two simple medium access control protocols. We find that network effects can degrade the performance of event-triggered control beyond the performance level of time-triggered control for the same average triggering rate if the network is used intensively. Moreover, the performance advantage of event-triggered control shrinks with an increasing number of agents and is even lost for sufficiently large networks in the considered setup.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2022

Analysis of Time- versus Event-Triggered Consensus for a Single-Integrator Multi-Agent System

It is well known that the employed triggering scheme has great impact on the control performance when control loops operate under scarce communication resources. Various practical and simulative works have demonstrated the potential of event-triggered control to reduce communication while providing a similar performance level when compared to time-triggered control. For non-cooperative networked control systems, analytical performance comparisons of time- and event-triggered control support this finding under certain assumptions. While being well-studied in the non-cooperative setting, it remains unclear if and how the performance relationship of the triggering schemes is altered in a multi-agent system setup. To close this gap, in this paper, we consider a homogeneous single-integrator multi-agent consensus problem for which we compare the performance of time- and event-triggered control schemes analytically. Under the assumption of equal average triggering rates, we use the long-term average of the quadratic deviation from consensus as a performance measure to contrast the triggering schemes. Contrary to the non-cooperative setting, we prove that event-triggered control performs worse than time-triggered control beyond a certain number of agents in this setup. In addition, we derive the asymptotic order of the performance measure as a function of the number of agents under both triggering schemes.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2020

A Track-Before-Detect Approach to Multi-Target Tracking on Automotive Radar Sensor Data

In recent years, Bayes filter methods in the labeled random finite set formulation have become increasingly powerful in the multi-target tracking domain. One of the latest outcomes is the Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) filter which allows for stable cardinality and target state estimation as well as target identification in a unified framework. In contrast to the initial context of the GLMB filter, this paper makes use of it in the Track-Before-Detect (TBD) scheme and thus, avoids information loss due to thresholding and other data preprocessing steps. This paper provides a TBD GLMB filter design under the separable likelihood assumption that can be applied to real world scenarios and data in the automotive radar context. Its applicability to real sensor data is demonstrated in an exemplary scenario. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the GLMB filter is applied to real radar data in a TBD framework for the first time.

eess.SP↗