arXiv subjects

David Obeh Alobo

Publications and source records attributed to David Obeh Alobo.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Elucidating the Size of Chemical Space with Assembly Theory

Chemical space is unimaginably vast with common heuristic estimates suggesting that there are ca. 10^60 'drug-like' molecules possible below a molecular mass of 500 Da. However, these estimates largely ignore the structural and synthetic complexity of the molecules enumerated. Here we present a first-principles estimate of the size of chemical space using the Assembly Theory, which quantifies the amount of causation required to form a molecule, captured in the assembly Index. This is a measurable molecular complexity measure derived from the minimum number of recursive bond-joining operations required to construct a molecular graph. Assembly Theory partitions chemical space into levels defined by Assembly Index, allowing bounds to be placed on its growth as molecular complexity increases. We show that chemical space (the accumulated Assembly Index level sets) grows at least super-exponentially, and at most, double-exponentially with respect to the Assembly Index. Using the GDB-13 database as a reference for growth-rate estimation, we model how chemical space expands under increasing complexity and contracts under structural constraints, including atom and bond types, number of rings, ring size, and chemical motifs. Under constraints comparable to standard drug-like estimates, including molecular mass below 500 Da, our analysis yields a chemical space of approximately 10117 molecules at Assembly Index 25. Finally, we constrain chemical space by biologically relevant motifs and identify structurally relevant molecules near the accessible boundaries of these assembly-defined spaces.

physics.chem-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Knowledge to Action: Outcomes of the 2025 Large Language Model (LLM) Hackathon for Applications in Materials Science and Chemistry

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly changing how researchers in materials science and chemistry discover, organize, and act on scientific knowledge. This paper analyzes a broad set of community-developed LLM applications in an effort to identify emerging patterns in how these systems can be used across the scientific research lifecycle. We organize the projects into two complementary categories: Knowledge Infrastructure, systems that structure, retrieve, synthesize, and validate scientific information; and Action Systems, systems that execute, coordinate, or automate scientific work across computational and experimental environments. The submissions reveal a shift from single-purpose LLM tools toward integrated, multi-agent workflows that combine retrieval, reasoning, tool use, and domain-specific validation. Prominent themes include retrieval-augmented generation as grounding infrastructure, persistent structured knowledge representations, multimodal and multilingual scientific inputs, and early progress toward laboratory-integrated closed-loop systems. Together, these results suggest that LLMs are evolving from general-purpose assistants into composable infrastructure for scientific reasoning and action. This work provides a community snapshot of that transition and a practical taxonomy for understanding emerging LLM-enabled workflows in materials science and chemistry.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci↗

arXiv2025

Exploring molecular assembly as a biosignature using mass spectrometry and machine learning

Molecular assembly offers a promising path to detect life beyond Earth, while minimizing assumptions based on terrestrial life. As mass spectrometers will be central to upcoming Solar System missions, predicting molecular assembly from their data without needing to elucidate unknown structures will be essential for unbiased life detection. An ideal agnostic biosignature must be interpretable and experimentally measurable. Here, we show that molecular assembly, a recently developed approach to measure objects that have been produced by evolution, satisfies both criteria. First, it is interpretable for life detection, as it reflects the assembly of molecules with their bonds as building blocks, in contrast to approaches that discount construction history. Second, it can be determined without structural elucidation, as it can be physically measured by mass spectrometry, a property that distinguishes it from other approaches that use structure-based information measures for molecular complexity. Whilst molecular assembly is directly measurable using mass spectrometry data, there are limits imposed by mission constraints. To address this, we developed a machine learning model that predicts molecular assembly with high accuracy, reducing error by three-fold compared to baseline models. Simulated data shows that even small instrumental inconsistencies can double model error, emphasizing the need for standardization. These results suggest that standardized mass spectrometry databases could enable accurate molecular assembly prediction, without structural elucidation, providing a proof-of-concept for future astrobiology missions.

cs.LG↗