arXiv subjects

David Rindt

Publications and source records attributed to David Rindt.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2021

Survival Regression with Proper Scoring Rules and Monotonic Neural Networks

We consider frequently used scoring rules for right-censored survival regression models such as time-dependent concordance, survival-CRPS, integrated Brier score and integrated binomial log-likelihood, and prove that neither of them is a proper scoring rule. This means that the true survival distribution may be scored worse than incorrect distributions, leading to inaccurate estimation. We prove that, in contrast to these scores, the right-censored log-likelihood is a proper scoring rule, i.e., the highest expected score is achieved by the true distribution. Despite this, modern feed-forward neural-network-based survival regression models are unable to train and validate directly on the right-censored log-likelihood, due to its intractability, and resort to the aforementioned alternatives, i.e., non-proper scoring rules. We therefore propose a simple novel survival regression method capable of directly optimizing log-likelihood using a monotonic restriction on the time-dependent weights, coined SurvivalMonotonic-net (SuMo-net). SuMo-net achieves state-of-the-art log-likelihood scores across several datasets with 20--100$\times$ computational speedup on inference over existing state-of-the-art neural methods, and is readily applicable to datasets with several million observations.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2020

Consistency of permutation tests for HSIC and dHSIC

The Hilbert--Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) is a popular measure of the dependency between two random variables. The statistic dHSIC is an extension of HSIC that can be used to test joint independence of $d$ random variables. Such hypothesis testing for (joint) independence is often done using a permutation test, which compares the observed data with randomly permuted datasets. The main contribution of this work is proving that the power of such independence tests converges to 1 as the sample size converges to infinity. This answers a question that was asked in (Pfister, 2018) Additionally this work proves correct type 1 error rate of HSIC and dHSIC permutation tests and provides guidance on how to select the number of permutations one uses in practice. While correct type 1 error rate was already proved in (Pfister, 2018), we provide a modified proof following (Berrett, 2019), which extends to the case of non-continuous data. The number of permutations to use was studied e.g. by (Marozzi, 2004) but not in the context of HSIC and with a slight difference in the estimate of the $p$-value and for permutations rather than vectors of permutations. While the last two points have limited novelty we include these to give a complete overview of permutation testing in the context of HSIC and dHSIC.

math.ST↗

arXiv2019

A kernel log-rank test of independence for right-censored data

We introduce a general non-parametric independence test between right-censored survival times and covariates, which may be multivariate. Our test statistic has a dual interpretation, first in terms of the supremum of a potentially infinite collection of weight-indexed log-rank tests, with weight functions belonging to a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) of functions; and second, as the norm of the difference of embeddings of certain finite measures into the RKHS, similar to the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) test-statistic. We study the asymptotic properties of the test, finding sufficient conditions to ensure our test correctly rejects the null hypothesis under any alternative. The test statistic can be computed straightforwardly, and the rejection threshold is obtained via an asymptotically consistent Wild Bootstrap procedure. Extensive investigations on both simulated and real data suggest that our testing procedure generally performs better than competing approaches in detecting complex non-linear dependence.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

A kernel- and optimal transport- based test of independence between covariates and right-censored lifetimes

We propose a nonparametric test of independence, termed optHSIC, between a covariate and a right-censored lifetime. Because the presence of censoring creates a challenge in applying the standard permutation-based testing approaches, we use optimal transport to transform the censored dataset into an uncensored one, while preserving the relevant dependencies. We then apply a permutation test using the kernel-based dependence measure as a statistic to the transformed dataset. The type 1 error is proven to be correct in the case where censoring is independent of the covariate. Experiments indicate that optHSIC has power against a much wider class of alternatives than Cox proportional hazards regression and that it has the correct type 1 control even in the challenging cases where censoring strongly depends on the covariate.

math.ST↗