SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

David Rossell

Publications and source records attributed to David Rossell.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

E-Values For Multiplicity Control In Multiverse Analysis

Multiverse analysis refers to a common situation where one wishes to assess the association between multiple possible treatment definitions and multiple possible outcome definitions, potentially within multiple sub-populations, among other possible analysis specifications. Multiverse analysis is a useful exploratory tool to assess heterogeneity across the considered specifications, but it is sometimes also used to assess statistical significance. In the latter case, it is critical to acknowledge that multiple comparisons are being performed, and to ensure a valid statistical control of false positive findings. We study the use of e-values within generalized linear models as a tool to control the false discovery rate regardless of the dependence structure of the multiple analyses being performed, while accounting for confounding covariates. We compare the performance of several approaches: universal e-values, soft-rank e-values, and p-to-e calibration. We find that, for problem characteristics typically encountered in multiverse analyses, p-to-e calibration significantly outperforms the other two approaches in terms of statistical power, but said power may be moderate unless the sample size or effect sizes are large enough. An application studying the association between teenager technology use and mental well-being reveals association between depression, low self-steem and peer problems with internet and social media usage.

stat.ME

Positive-definiteness in separable priors: effects on prior interpretability and inference

A popular class of priors for symmetric positive-definite matrices assumes independent entries and adds a truncation to ensure positive-definiteness. While conceptually simple and often computationally convenient, unless done carefully this truncation can have unintended effects. If the truncated prior or its margins are significantly different from their untruncated counterpart, then its interpretability may suffer, its shrinkage properties become harder to characterise, and posterior inference may be affected in unanticipated ways. We investigate the effect of the truncation both for dense and sparse matrices, and show how to set prior parameters such as the variance of off-diagonal entries such that said effect is mitigated as the matrix dimension grows. We pay particular attention to sparse inference where, unless prior parameters are set carefully, the truncated prior and hence its corresponding posterior assign systematically higher mass to sparser structures than the untruncated prior.

stat.ME

Bayesian computation for high-dimensional Gaussian Graphical Models with spike-and-slab priors

Gaussian graphical models are widely used to infer dependence structures. Bayesian methods are appealing to quantify uncertainty associated with structural learning, i.e., the plausibility of conditional independence statements given the data, and parameter estimates. However, computational demands have limited their application when the number of variables is large, which prompted the use of pseudo-Bayesian approaches. We propose fully Bayesian algorithms that provably scale to high dimensions when the data-generating precision matrix is sparse, at a similar cost to the best pseudo-Bayesian methods. First, a Metropolis-Hastings-within-Block-Gibbs algorithm that allows row-wise updates of the precision matrix, using local moves. Second, a global proposal that enables adding or removing multiple edges within a row, which can help explore multi-modal posteriors. We obtain mixing bounds for both samplers relative to an ideal Gibbs sampler that are dimension-free under suitable settings, and prove that this ideal Gibbs sampler is geometrically ergodic. We also provide worst-case polynomial bounds on per-iteration costs, though in practice the cost is lower by using sparse linear algebra. Our examples show that the methods extend the applicability of exact Bayesian inference from roughly 100 to roughly 1000 variables (equivalently, from 5,000 edges to 500,000 edges).

stat.ME

Empirical Bayes for Data Integration

We discuss the use of empirical Bayes for data integration, in the sense of transfer learning. Our main interest is in settings where one wishes to learn structure (e.g. feature selection) and one only has access to incomplete data from previous studies, such as summaries, estimates or lists of relevant features. We discuss differences between full Bayes and empirical Bayes, and develop a computational framework for the latter. We discuss how empirical Bayes attains consistent variable selection under weaker conditions (sparsity and betamin assumptions) than full Bayes and other standard criteria do, and how it attains faster convergence rates. Our high-dimensional regression examples show that fully Bayesian inference enjoys excellent properties, and that data integration with empirical Bayes can offer moderate yet meaningful improvements in practice.

stat.ME

Improving variable selection properties with data integration and transfer learning

We study variable selection (also called support recovery) in high-dimensional sparse linear regression when one has external information on which variables are likely to be associated with the response. Consistent recovery is only possible under somewhat restrictive conditions on sample size, dimension, signal strength, and sparsity. We investigate how these conditions can be relaxed by incorporating said external information. A key application that we consider is structural transfer learning, where variables selected in one or more source datasets are used to guide variable selection in a target dataset. We introduce a family of likelihood penalties that depend on the external information, motivated by connections to Bayesian variable selection. We show that these methods achieve variable selection consistency in regimes where any method ignoring external information fails, and that they achieve consistency at faster rates. We first quantify the potential gains under ideal, oracle-chosen, penalties. We then propose computationally efficient empirical Bayes procedures that learn suitable penalties from the data. We prove that these procedures have improved variable selection properties compared to methods that do not use external information. We illustrate our approach using simulations and a genomics application, where results from mouse experiments are used to inform variable selection for gene expression data in humans.

math.ST

Semi-parametric local variable selection under misspecification

Local variable selection aims to test for the effect of covariates on an outcome within specific regions. We outline a challenge that arises in the presence of non-linear effects and model misspecification. Specifically, for common semi-parametric methods even slight model misspecification can result in a high false positive rate, in a manner that is highly sensitive to the chosen basis functions. We propose a methodology based on orthogonal cut splines that avoids false positive inflation for any choice of knots, and achieves consistent local variable selection. Our approach offers simplicity, handles both continuous and categorical covariates, and provides theory for high-dimensional covariates and model misspecification. We discuss settings with either independent or dependent data. Our proposal allows including adjustment covariates that do not undergo selection, enhancing the model's flexibility. Our examples describe salary gaps associated with various discrimination factors at different ages, and the effects of covariates on functional data measuring brain activation at different times.

stat.ME

Graphical model inference with external network data

We consider two applications where we study how dependence structure between many variables is linked to external network data. We first study the interplay between social media connectedness and the co-evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic across USA counties. We next study study how the dependence between stock market returns across firms relates to similarities in economic and policy indicators from text regulatory filings. Both applications are modelled via Gaussian graphical models where one has external network data. We develop spike-and-slab and graphical LASSO frameworks to integrate the network data, both facilitating the interpretation of the graphical model and improving inference. The goal is to detect when the network data relates to the graphical model and, if so, explain how. We found that counties strongly connected on Facebook are more likely to have similar COVID-19 evolution (positive partial correlations), accounting for various factors driving the mean. We also found that the association in stock market returns depends in a stronger fashion on economic than on policy indicators. The examples show that data integration can improve interpretation, statistical accuracy, and out-of-sample prediction, in some instances using significantly sparser graphical models.

stat.AP

Specification analysis for technology use and teenager well-being: statistical validity and a Bayesian proposal

A key issue in science is assessing robustness to data analysis choices, while avoiding selective reporting and providing valid inference. Specification Curve Analysis is a tool intended to prevent selective reporting. Alas, when used for inference it can create severe biases and false positives, due to wrongly adjusting for covariates, and mask important treatment effect heterogeneity. As our motivating application, it led an influential study to conclude there is no relevant association between technology use and teenager mental well-being. We discuss these issues and propose a strategy for valid inference. Bayesian Specification Curve Analysis (BSCA) uses Bayesian Model Averaging to incorporate covariates and heterogeneous effects across treatments, outcomes and sub-populations. BSCA gives significantly different insights into teenager well-being, revealing that the association with technology differs by device, gender and who assesses well-being (teenagers or their parents).

stat.AP

General Bayesian Loss Function Selection and the use of Improper Models

Statisticians often face the choice between using probability models or a paradigm defined by minimising a loss function. Both approaches are useful and, if the loss can be re-cast into a proper probability model, there are many tools to decide which model or loss is more appropriate for the observed data, in the sense of explaining the data's nature. However, when the loss leads to an improper model, there are no principled ways to guide this choice. We address this task by combining the Hyvärinen score, which naturally targets infinitesimal relative probabilities, and general Bayesian updating, which provides a unifying framework for inference on losses and models. Specifically we propose the H-score, a general Bayesian selection criterion and prove that it consistently selects the (possibly improper) model closest to the data-generating truth in Fisher's divergence. We also prove that an associated H-posterior consistently learns optimal hyper-parameters featuring in loss functions, including a challenging tempering parameter in generalised Bayesian inference. As salient examples, we consider robust regression and non-parametric density estimation where popular loss functions define improper models for the data and hence cannot be dealt with using standard model selection tools. These examples illustrate advantages in robustness-efficiency trade-offs and provide a Bayesian implementation for kernel density estimation, opening a new avenue for Bayesian non-parametrics.

stat.ME

Additive Bayesian variable selection under censoring and misspecification

We discuss the role of misspecification and censoring on Bayesian model selection in the contexts of right-censored survival and concave log-likelihood regression. Misspecification includes wrongly assuming the censoring mechanism to be non-informative. Emphasis is placed on additive accelerated failure time, Cox proportional hazards and probit models. We offer a theoretical treatment that includes local and non-local priors, and a general non-linear effect decomposition to improve power-sparsity trade-offs. We discuss a fundamental question: what solution can one hope to obtain when (inevitably) models are misspecified, and how to interpret it? Asymptotically, covariates that do not have predictive power for neither the outcome nor (for survival data) censoring times, in the sense of reducing a likelihood-associated loss, are discarded. Misspecification and censoring have an asymptotically negligible effect on false positives, but their impact on power is exponential. We show that it can be advantageous to consider simple models that are computationally practical yet attain good power to detect potentially complex effects, including the use of finite-dimensional basis to detect truly non-parametric effects. We also discuss algorithms to capitalize on sufficient statistics and fast likelihood approximations for Gaussian-based survival and binary models.

stat.ME

Inference for multiple treatment effects using confounder importance learning

We address modelling and computational issues for multiple treatment effect inference under many potential confounders. Our main contribution is providing a trade-off between preventing the omission of relevant confounders, while not running into an over-selection of instruments that significantly inflates variance. We propose a novel empirical Bayes framework for Bayesian model averaging that learns from data the prior inclusion probabilities of key covariates. Our framework sets a data-dependent prior that asymptotically matches the true amount of confounding in the data, as measured by a novel confounding coefficient. A key challenge is computational. We develop fast algorithms, using an exact gradient of the marginal likelihood that has linear cost in the number of covariates, and a variational counterpart. Our framework uses widely-used ingredients and largely existing software, and it is implemented within the R package mombf. We illustrate our work with two applications. The first is the association between salary variation and discriminatory factors. The second, that has been debated in previous works, is the association between abortion policies and crime. Our approach provides insights that differ from previous analyses especially in situations with weaker treatment effects.

stat.ME

Approximate Laplace approximations for scalable model selection

We propose the approximate Laplace approximation (ALA) to evaluate integrated likelihoods, a bottleneck in Bayesian model selection. The Laplace approximation (LA) is a popular tool that speeds up such computation and equips strong model selection properties. However, when the sample size is large or one considers many models the cost of the required optimizations becomes impractical. ALA reduces the cost to that of solving a least-squares problem for each model. Further, it enables efficient computation across models such as sharing pre-computed sufficient statistics and certain operations in matrix decompositions. We prove that in generalized (possibly non-linear) models ALA achieves a strong form of model selection consistency for a suitably-defined optimal model, at the same functional rates as exact computation. We consider fixed- and high-dimensional problems, group and hierarchical constraints, and the possibility that all models are misspecified. We also obtain ALA rates for Gaussian regression under non-local priors, an important example where the LA can be costly and does not consistently estimate the integrated likelihood. Our examples include non-linear regression, logistic, Poisson and survival models. We implement the methodology in the R package mombf.

stat.CO

Partial Correlation Graphical LASSO

Standard likelihood penalties to learn Gaussian graphical models are based on regularising the off-diagonal entries of the precision matrix. Such methods, and their Bayesian counterparts, are not invariant to scalar multiplication of the variables, unless one standardises the observed data to unit sample variances. We show that such standardisation can have a strong effect on inference and introduce a new family of penalties based on partial correlations. We show that the latter, as well as the maximum likelihood, $L_0$ and logarithmic penalties are scale invariant. We illustrate the use of one such penalty, the partial correlation graphical LASSO, which sets an $L_{1}$ penalty on partial correlations. The associated optimization problem is no longer convex, but is conditionally convex. We show via simulated examples and in two real datasets that, besides being scale invariant, there can be important gains in terms of inference.

stat.ME

Concentration of posterior probabilities and normalized L0 criteria

We study frequentist properties of Bayesian and $L_0$ model selection, with a focus on (potentially non-linear) high-dimensional regression. We propose a construction to study how posterior probabilities and normalized $L_0$ criteria concentrate on the (Kullback-Leibler) optimal model and other subsets of the model space. When such concentration occurs, one also bounds the frequentist probabilities of selecting the correct model, type I and type II errors. These results hold generally, and help validate the use of posterior probabilities and $L_0$ criteria to control frequentist error probabilities associated to model selection and hypothesis tests. Regarding regression, we help understand the effect of the sparsity imposed by the prior or the $L_0$ penalty, and of problem characteristics such as the sample size, signal-to-noise, dimension and true sparsity. A particular finding is that one may use less sparse formulations than would be asymptotically optimal, but still attain consistency and often also significantly better finite-sample performance. We also prove new results related to misspecifying the mean or covariance structures, and give tighter rates for certain non-local priors than currently available.

math.ST

Dependence in elliptical partial correlation graphs

The Gaussian model equips strong properties that facilitate studying and interpreting graphical models. Specifically it reduces conditional independence and the study of positive association to determining partial correlations and their signs. When Gaussianity does not hold partial correlation graphs are a useful relaxation of graphical models, but it is not clear what information they contain (besides the obvious lack of linear association). We study elliptical and transelliptical distributions as middle-ground between the Gaussian and other families that are more flexible but either do not embed strong properties or do not lead to simple interpretation. We characterize the meaning of zero partial correlations in the elliptical family and transelliptical copula models and show that it retains much of the dependence structure from the Gaussian case. Regarding positive dependence, we prove impossibility results to learn (trans)elliptical graphical models, including that an elliptical distribution that is multivariate totally positive of order two for all dimensions must be essentially Gaussian. We then show how to interpret positive partial correlations as a relaxation, and obtain important properties related to faithfulness and Simpson's paradox. We illustrate the transelliptical model potential to study tail dependence in S&P500 data, and of positivity to improve regularized inference.

math.ST

On choosing mixture components via non-local priors

Choosing the number of mixture components remains an elusive challenge. Model selection criteria can be either overly liberal or conservative and return poorly-separated components of limited practical use. We formalize non-local priors (NLPs) for mixtures and show how they lead to well-separated components with non-negligible weight, interpretable as distinct subpopulations. We also propose an estimator for posterior model probabilities under local and non-local priors, showing that Bayes factors are ratios of posterior to prior empty-cluster probabilities. The estimator is widely applicable and helps set thresholds to drop unoccupied components in overfitted mixtures. We suggest default prior parameters based on multi-modality for Normal/T mixtures and minimal informativeness for categorical outcomes. We characterise theoretically the NLP-induced sparsity, derive tractable expressions and algorithms. We fully develop Normal, Binomial and product Binomial mixtures but the theory, computation and principles hold more generally. We observed a serious lack of sensitivity of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), insufficient parsimony of the AIC and a local prior, and a mixed behavior of the singular BIC. We also considered overfitted mixtures, their performance was competitive but depended on tuning parameters. Under our default prior elicitation NLPs offered a good compromise between sparsity and power to detect meaningfully-separated components.

stat.ME

Heterogeneous large datasets integration using Bayesian factor regression

Two key challenges in modern statistical applications are the large amount of information recorded per individual, and that such data are often not collected all at once but in batches. These batch effects can be complex, causing distortions in both mean and variance. We propose a novel sparse latent factor regression model to integrate such heterogeneous data. The model provides a tool for data exploration via dimensionality reduction while correcting for a range of batch effects. We study the use of several sparse priors (local and non-local) to learn the dimension of the latent factors. Our model is fitted in a deterministic fashion by means of an EM algorithm for which we derive closed-form updates, contributing a novel scalable algorithm for non-local priors of interest beyond the immediate scope of this paper. We present several examples, with a focus on bioinformatics applications. Our results show an increase in the accuracy of the dimensionality reduction, with non-local priors substantially improving the reconstruction of factor cardinality, as well as the need to account for batch effects to obtain reliable results. Our model provides a novel approach to latent factor regression that balances sparsity with sensitivity and is highly computationally efficient.

stat.AP