Davide Cianchino | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Use of Cholesky decomposition in the CFOUR program package

An overview is given about our efforts to speed up high-level computations of molec- ular energies and properties using Cholesky decomposition (CD). We describe the cor- responding developments in the CFOUR quantum-chemical package with a focus on (a) the use of CD in complete-active space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) and coupled- cluster (CC) computations, (b) the implementation of analytic CC gradients using CD, (c) the efficient calculation of magnetic properties (NMR shieldings and magnetizabili- ties) using CD when carried out with explicit magnetic-field dependent basis functions, i.e., the so-called gauge-including atomic orbitals (GIAOs), (d) the efficient computa- tion of CASSCF response properties using CD, (e) the use of CD in relativistic two- and four-component computations, as well as (f) computations for molecules in finite magnetic fields using GIAOs together with CD. An outlook on future developments concerning the CFOUR package is given.

physics.chem-ph↗

arXiv2024

Cholesky decomposition in spin-free Dirac-Coulomb coupled-cluster calculations

We present an implementation for the use of Cholesky decomposition (CD) of two-electron integrals within the spin-free Dirac-Coulomb (SFDC) scheme that enables to perform high-accuracy coupled-cluster (CC) calculations at costs almost comparable to those of their non-relativistic counterparts. While for non-relativistic CC calculations atomic-orbital (AO) based algorithms, due to their significantly reduced disk-space requirements, are the key to efficient large-scale computations, such algorithms are less advantageous in the SFDC case due to their increased computational cost on that case. Here, molecular-orbital (MO) based algorithms exploiting the CD of the two-electron integrals allow to reduce disk-space requirements, and lead to computational cost in the CC step that are more or less the same as in the non-relativistic case. The only remaining overhead in a CD-SFDC-CC calculation are due to the need to compute additional two-electron integrals, the somewhat higher cost of the Hartree-Fock calculation in the SFDC case, and additional cost in the transformation of the Cholesky vectors from the AO to the MO representation. However, these additional costs typically amount to less than 5-15 % of the total wall time and are thus acceptable. We illustrate the efficiency of our CD scheme for SFDC-CC calculations on a series of illustrative calculations for the X(CO)$_4$ molecules with X = Ni, Pd, Pt.

physics.chem-ph↗