Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Davidson Rabetiarivony

Publications and source records attributed to Davidson Rabetiarivony.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

$2^{++}$ Light Tensor Hybrid Meson from QCD Laplace Sum Rules

We present an analysis of the light tensor ($J^{PC}=2^{++}$) hybrid meson mass and coupling from QCD Laplace Sum Rules where the next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative (PT) corrections and the contributions of the non-perturbative (NP) condensates up to dimension-six ($D=6$) are included. NLO leading-logarithms corrections due to the condensates which contribute in the chiral limit are considered. We obtain the mass $M_{2^+}= (2038\pm 190)$ MeV and a relatively small coupling $f_{2^+}=(10.5\pm 2.9)$ MeV normalized as $f_π=93$ MeV. Our results suggest that the $f_2(1950)$ or/and the $f'_2(2010)$ may have a sizeable $\bar qqg$ hybrid component. We also compute the tensor hybrid topological charge (value of the two-point function at zero momentum) and find (for the first time) at NLO: $Π_{qg}(0)=(2.41\pm 0.43) \times 10^{-4}{\rm GeV}^6$ which could be checked from some lattice QCD or/and low energy theorems (LET).

hep-ph↗

$2^{++}$ Di-gluonium from LSR at higher order

We improve the determination of the mass and coupling of the $2^{++}$ tensor di-gluonium by using relativistic QCD Laplace sum rules (LSR). In so doing, we evaluate the next-to-leading order (NLO) corrections to the perturbative (PT) and $\langle α_s G^2 \rangle$ condensate and the lowest order (LO) $\langle G^3 \rangle$ contributions to the $2^{++}$ di-gluonium two-point correlator. Within a vacuum saturation estimate ($k_G=1$) of the dimension-eight gluon condensates, we obtain: $M_{T}=3028(287)\mbox{MeV}$ and the renormalization group invariant (RGI) coupling $\hat{f}_T=224(33)\mbox{MeV}$. Assuming that the factorization hypothesis can be violated, we study the effect of the violation factor $k_G$ on the results and obtain: $M_T=3188(337)\mbox{MeV}$ and $\hat{f}_T=245(32)\mbox{MeV}$ for $k_G=(3\pm 2)$. Our estimation does not favour the interpretation of the observed $f_2(2010)$, $f_2(2300)$ and $f_2(2340)$ as pure glueball state.

hep-ph↗