arXiv subjects

Dayam Nadeem

Publications and source records attributed to Dayam Nadeem.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

They Know Where It Is, But Not What It Says: A Bilingual Hallucination Benchmark of Hadith Recall in Open LLMs

Large language models are increasingly consulted for religious knowledge, including the recall of specific Hadith (recorded sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him). Unlike open-ended generation, Hadith recall is a high-stakes, verifiable task: a reference (collection, chapter, and Hadith number) has exactly one correct text, and any deviation from it constitutes a fabrication that can be mistaken for authentic scripture. This study introduces a bilingual (English/Arabic) benchmark that probes five open-weight, locally-deployable language models (Mistral-7B, Gemma3-4B, Jais-7B, ALLaM-7B, and Phi4-mini-3.8B) across all six canonical Sunni Hadith collections (Sahih al-Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abi Da'ud, Jami' al-Tirmidhi, Sunan an-Nasa'i, Sunan Ibn Majah), sampling 500 Hadith per collection (3,000 per model per language, 30,000 responses total). Each model is given only the bibliographic reference and asked to reproduce the exact Hadith text, with no retrieval augmentation, and is scored on lexical fidelity (BLEU) and semantic fidelity (multilingual cosine similarity), with refusals flagged separately. Across all five models and both languages, 0% of 30,000 responses achieve both high lexical and high semantic fidelity, i.e., an exact, verifiable match to the source text. Arabic responses fare uniformly worse than English. These findings suggest that current open-weight LLMs, used without retrieval grounding, are unreliable and potentially dangerous sources for exact religious-text recall, and that deployment for Islamic scholarship should mandate retrieval-augmented generation over a verified corpus rather than parametric memory. The complete code, prompts, evaluation pipeline, and scored outputs are publicly available at https://github.com/dayam8696/Hadith-Hallucination-Benchmark.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Fluent but Fallible: Benchmarking Hallucination and Factual Reliability in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing and artificial intelligence applications through their capabilities in reasoning, text generation and knowledge retrieval. However, LLMs are still vulnerable to two important challenges: hallucination, generating factually incorrect or fabricated content, and response deviation, meaning systematic deviations from ground-truth responses. These limitations raise serious concerns regarding reliability and trustworthiness in academic and research environments. This study offers a thorough comparative analysis using a variety of metrics of ten advanced LLMs ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude~3.5~Sonnet, LLaMA~3, Mistral, Grok, Perplexity, DeepSeek~V3, Falcon, and Gemma based on a benchmark consisting of 70 carefully designed academic prompts across four complexity levels: Basic, Explanation, Advanced, and Tricky, evaluated in February 2025 on specific model versions. Each response was independently evaluated by three reviewers using five metrics: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, Response Deviation Index, and Hallucination Index. Perplexity and DeepSeek~V3 achieved the highest overall accuracy, while Gemini demonstrated strong recall and a well-balanced performance profile across all five metrics. LLaMA~3 showed strong resistance against hallucinations through a conservative method of generation. Advanced-level prompts proved most challenging across all models, while Tricky prompts were handled more reliably owing to their binary true/false structure. Falcon achieved perfect precision and zero hallucinations, but at the cost of the lowest recall and the highest response deviation. The results show a fundamental trade-off between response completeness and factual reliability, intensified by prompt complexity.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Optimized Deep Learning and LLM-Driven Intelligent AI on Computationally Limited Systems

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is among the musculoskeletal disorders that considerably restrict joint mobility, cause severe chronic pain and impact negatively on quality life. It is one of the persistent health issues worldwide. Generally, subjectivity and inter-observer variability undermine conventional practices and evaluation process that are adopted to address such health issues. Hence precise and timely diagnosis would be one of the effective ways for the assessment of its severity. This paper proposes an automated diagnostic approach for severity grading of KOA by blending a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) with a device-based inference platform powered by TensorFlow Lite. It proposes a model based on the ResNet-18 convolutional neural network. The designed model is trained on publicly available database. Through a transfer learning approach obtained knee images are first classified into five Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades. Further the developed model is optimised. During the training of the model test accuracy of 94.48% with stable convergence has been achieved. Subsequently the optimised model transformed into a lightweight TensorFlow Lite format, facilitating seamless deployment on resource-constrained devices. The designed model is capable enough to operate in the environment having no continuous internet connectivity. Also, an auxiliary Large Language Model (Gemini-2.0-flash) is applied to generate structured interpretive findings like potential symptoms, risk factors, and preventive majors etc. The LLM component functions as interface without influencing the classification process. The proposed model articulates the feasibility of an on-device, interpretable decision-support tools for early diagnosis and improve accessibility to Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted knee screening tool.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Surgeons Are Indian Males and Speech Therapists Are White Females: Auditing Biases in Vision-Language Models for Healthcare Professionals

Vision language models (VLMs), such as CLIP and OpenCLIP, can encode and reflect stereotypical associations between medical professions and demographic attributes learned from web-scale data. We present an evaluation protocol for healthcare settings that quantifies associated biases and assesses their operational risk. Our methodology (i) defines a taxonomy spanning clinicians and allied healthcare roles (e.g., surgeon, cardiologist, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, technician), (ii) curates a profession-aware prompt suite to probe model behavior, and (iii) benchmarks demographic skew against a balanced face corpus. Empirically, we observe consistent demographic biases across multiple roles and vision models. Our work highlights the importance of bias identification in critical domains such as healthcare as AI-enabled hiring and workforce analytics can have downstream implications for equity, compliance, and patient trust.

cs.CY↗