Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Dennis Dobler

Publications and source records attributed to Dennis Dobler.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Randomized Empirical Processes by Algebraic Groups, and Tests for Weak Null Hypotheses

Randomization tests are based on a re-randomization of existing data to gain data-dependent critical values that lead to exact hypothesis tests under special circumstances. However, it is not always possible to re-randomize data in accordance to the physical randomization from which the data has been obained. As a consequence, most statistical tests cannot control the type I error probability. Still, similarly as the bootstrap, data re-randomization can be used to improve the type I error control. However, no general asymptotic theory under weak null hypotheses has been developed for such randomization tests yet. It is the aim of this paper to provide a conveniently applicable theory on the asymptotic validity of randomization tests with asymptotically normal test statistics. Similarly, confidence intervals will be developed. This will be achieved by creating a link between two well-established fields in mathematical statistics: empirical processes and inference based on randomization via algebraic groups. A broadly applicable conditional weak convergence theorem is developed for empirical processes that are based on randomized observations. Random elements of an algebraic group are applied to the data vectors from which the randomized version of a statistic is derived. Combining a variant of the functional delta-method with a suitable studentization of the statistic, asymptotically exact hypothesis tests is deduced, while the finite sample exactness property under group-invariant sub-hypotheses is preserved. The methodology is exemplified with: the Pearson correlation coefficient, a Mann-Whitney effect based on right-censored paired data, and a competing risks analysis. The practical usefulness of the approaches is assessed through simulation studies and an application to data from patients suffering from diabetic retinopathy.

math.ST↗

Inferring median survival differences in general factorial designs via permutation tests

Factorial survival designs with right-censored observations are commonly inferred by Cox regression and explained by means of hazard ratios. However, in case of non-proportional hazards, their interpretation can become cumbersome; especially for clinicians. We therefore offer an alternative: median survival times are used to estimate treatment and interaction effects and null hypotheses are formulated in contrasts of their population versions. Permutation-based tests and confidence regions are proposed and shown to be asymptotically valid. Their type-1 error control and power behavior are investigated in extensive simulations, showing the new methods' wide applicability. The latter is complemented by an illustrative data analysis.

stat.ME↗

Time-dynamic inference for non-Markov transition probabilities under independent right-censoring

In this article, weak convergence of the general non-Markov state transition probability estimator by Titman (2015) is established which, up to now, has not been verified yet for other general non-Markov estimators. A similar theorem is shown for the bootstrap, yielding resampling-based inference methods for statistical functionals. Formulas of the involved covariance functions are presented in detail. Particular applications include the conditional expected length of stay in a specific state, given occupation of another state in the past, as well as the construction of time-simultaneous confidence bands for the transition probabilities. The expected lengths of stay in the two-sample liver cirrhosis data-set by Andersen et al. (1993) are compared and confidence intervals for their difference are constructed. With borderline significance and in comparison to the placebo group, the treatment group has an elevated expected length of stay in the healthy state given an earlier disease state occupation. In contrast, the Aalen-Johansen estimator-based confidence interval, which relies on a Markov assumption, leads to a drastically different conclusion. Also, graphical illustrations of confidence bands for the transition probabilities demonstrate the biasedness of the Aalen-Johansen estimator in this data example. The reliability of these results is assessed in a simulation study.

math.ST↗

Wild Bootstrap based Confidence Bands for Multiplicative Hazards Models

We propose new resampling-based approaches to construct asymptotically valid time simultaneous confidence bands for cumulative hazard functions in multi-state Cox models. In particular, we exemplify the methodology in detail for the simple Cox model with time dependent covariates, where the data may be subject to independent right-censoring or left-truncation. In extensive simulations we investigate their finite sample behaviour. Finally, the methods are utilized to analyze an empirical example.

math.ST↗

Survival of the Fittest Group: Factorial Analyses of Treatment Effects under Independent Right-Censoring

This paper introduces new effect parameters for factorial survival designs with possibly right-censored time-to-event data. In the special case of a two-sample design it coincides with the concordance or Wilcoxon parameter in survival analysis. More generally, the new parameters describe treatment or interaction effects and we develop estimates and tests to infer their presence. We rigorously study the asymptotic properties by means of empirical process techniques and additionally suggest wild bootstrapping for a consistent and distribution-free application of the inference procedures. The small sample performance is discussed based on simulation results. The practical usefulness of the developed methodology is exemplified on a data example about patients with colon cancer by conducting one- and two-factorial analyses.

math.ST↗

Nonparametric MANOVA in Mann-Whitney effects

Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) is a powerful and versatile method to infer and quantify main and interaction effects in metric multivariate multi-factor data. It is, however, neither robust against change in units nor a meaningful tool for ordinal data. Thus, we propose a novel nonparametric MANOVA. Contrary to existing rank-based procedures we infer hypotheses formulated in terms of meaningful Mann-Whitney-type effects in lieu of distribution functions. The tests are based on a quadratic form in multivariate rank effect estimators and critical values are obtained by the bootstrap. This newly developed procedure consequently provides asymptotically exact and consistent inference for general models such as the nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem as well as multivariate one-, two-, and higher-way crossed layouts. Computer simulations in small samples confirm the reliability of the developed method for ordinal as well as metric data with covariance heterogeneity. Finally, an analysis of a real data example illustrates the applicability and correct interpretation of the results.

math.ST↗

The Wild Bootstrap for Multivariate Nelson-Aalen Estimators

We rigorously extend the widely used wild bootstrap resampling technique to the multivariate Nelson-Aalen estimator under Aalen's multiplicative intensity model. Aalen's model covers general Markovian multistate models including competing risks subject to independent left-truncation and right-censoring. This leads to various statistical applications such as asymptotically valid confidence bands or tests for equivalence and proportional hazards. This is exemplified in a data analysis examining the impact of ventilation on the duration of intensive care unit stay. The finite sample properties of the new procedures are investigated in a simulation study.

stat.ME↗

Inference for the Mann-Whitney Effect for Right-Censored and Tied Data

The Mann-Whitney effect is an intuitive measure for discriminating two survival distributions. Here we analyze various inference techniques for this parameter in a two-sample survival setting with independent right-censoring, where the survival times are even allowed to be discretely distributed. This allows for ties in the data and requires the introduction of normalized versions of Kaplan-Meier estimators from which adequate point estimates are deduced. From an asymptotic analysis of the latter, asymptotically exact inference procedures based on standard normal, bootstrap- and permutation-quantiles are developed and compared in simulations. Here, the asymptotically robust and, in case of equal survival and censoring distributions, even finitely exact permutation procedure turned out to be the best. Finally, all procedures are illustrated using a real data set.

math.ST↗

Bootstrapping the Kaplan-Meier Estimator on the Whole Line

This article is concerned with proving the consistency of Efron's (1981) bootstrap for the Kaplan-Meier estimator on the whole support of a survival function. While other works address the asymptotic Gaussianity of the estimator itself without restricting time (e.g. Gill, 1983, and Ying, 1989), we enable the construction of bootstrap-based time-simultaneous confidence bands for the whole survival function. Other practical applications include bootstrap-based confidence bands for the mean residual life-time function or the Lorenz curve as well as confidence intervals for the Gini index.

math.ST↗

Approximative Tests for the Equality of Two Cumulative Incidence Functions of a Competing Risk

In the context of the widely used competing risks set-up we discuss different inference procedures for testing equality of two cumulative incidence functions, where the data may be subject to independent right-censoring or left-truncation. To this end we compare two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov- and Cramer-von Mises-type test statistics. Since, in general, their corresponding asymptotic limit distributions depend on unknown quantities, we utilize wild bootstrap resampling as well as approximation techniques to construct adequate test decisions. Here the latter procedures are motivated from testing procedures for heteroscedastic factorial designs but have not yet been proposed in the survival context. A simulation study shows the performance of all considered tests under various settings and finally a real data example about bloodstream infection during neutropenia is used to illustrate their application.

math.ST↗

Non-strange Weird Resampling for Complex Survival Data

This paper introduces the new data-dependent multiplier bootstrap for non-parametric analysis of survival data, possibly subject to competing risks. The new resampling procedure includes both the general wild bootstrap and the weird bootstrap as special cases. The data may be subject to independent right-censoring and left-truncation. We rigorously prove asymptotic correctness which has in particular been pending for the weird bootstrap. As a consequence, pointwise as well as time-simultaneous inference procedures for, amongst others, the classical survival setting are deduced. We report simulation results and a real data analysis of the cumulative cardiovascular event probability. The simulation results suggest that both the weird bootstrap and use of non-standard multipliers in the wild bootstrap may perform preferably.

math.ST↗

Direct Bootstrapping and Permuting of Observations fail for Aalen-Johansen Estimators

This article provides rigorous proofs that neither Efron's bootstrap nor permutation techniques can be applied directly to the observations to construct consistent resampling tests for transition probability matrices of finite-state Markov processes. These methods modify the covariance functions of the limiting distributions of the involved Aalen-Johansen processes, even in the case of fully observable individuals. An example for the failure of these resampling methods is given by cumulative incidence functions in competing risks set-ups.

math.ST↗

Exponent dependence measures of survival functions and correlated frailty models

The present article studies survival analytic aspects of semiparametric copula dependence models with arbitrary univariate marginals. The underlying survival functions admit a representation via exponent measures which have an interpretation within the context of hazard functions. In particular, correlated frailty survival models are linked to copulas. Additionally, the relation to exponent measures of minumum-infinitely divisible distributions as well as to the Lévy measure of the Lévy-Khintchine formula is pointed out. The semiparametric character of the current analyses and the construction of survival times with dependencies of higher order are carried out in detail. Many examples including graphics give multifarious illustrations.

math.ST↗

How to Bootstrap Aalen-Johansen Processes for Competing Risks? Handicaps, Solutions and Limitations

Statistical inference in competing risks models is often based on the famous Aalen-Johansen estimator. Since the corresponding limit process lacks independent increments, it is typically applied together with Lin's (1997) resampling technique involving standard normal multipliers. Recently, it has been seen that this approach can be interpreted as a wild bootstrap technique and that other multipliers, as e.g. centered Poissons, may lead to better finite sample performances, see Beyersmann et al. (2013). Since the latter is closely related to Efron's classical bootstrap, the question arises whether this or more general weighted bootstrap versions of Aalen-Johansen processes lead to valid results. Here we analyze their asymptotic behaviour and it turns out that such weighted bootstrap versions in general possess the wrong covariance structure in the limit. However, we explain that the weighted bootstrap can nevertheless be applied for specific null hypotheses of interest and also discuss its limitations for statistical inference. To this end, we introduce different consistent weighted bootstrap tests for the null hypothesis of stochastically ordered cumulative incidence functions and compare their finite sample performance in a simulation study.

math.ST↗