arXiv subjects

Depeng Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Depeng Liu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Synthesizing Probabilistic Saturating Counters with Differentially Private Formal Guarantees

Branch predictors improve instruction-level parallelism in modern processors and are commonly modeled using saturating counters. However, classical saturating counters are deterministic and thus vulnerable to side-channel attacks: an attacker can manipulate the counter state and infer the branch direction of a victim process. Probabilistic saturating counters (PSCs) have been proposed to mitigate this leakage by randomizing counter updates, but existing evaluations are mainly empirical. In this paper, we give a formal analysis based on differential privacy (DP): we model PSCs and the corresponding Prime+Probe attack strategies as probabilistic Moore machines, derive optimal attack strategies, and quantify the attacker's distinguishing power through DP. Our DP guarantee applies to the PSC primitive under the Prime+Probe observation model; end-to-end security for a full branch predictor under repeated or adaptive attacks is an important direction for future work. We then synthesize parameters for an enhanced PSC that satisfies a target pure DP guarantee. To evaluate utility, we derive the stationary misprediction rate and validate the theoretical predictions on benchmark programs. Compared to deterministic and existing probabilistic saturating counters, the synthesized PSCs provide formal security guarantees while preserving competitive prediction performance.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2022

Defensive Design of Saturating Counters Based on Differential Privacy

The saturating counter is the basic module of the dynamic branch predictor, which involves the core technique to improve instruction level parallelism performance in modern processors. However, most studies focus on the performance improvement and hardware consumption of saturating counters, while ignoring the security problems they may cause. In this paper, we creatively propose to study and design saturating counters from the defense perspective of differential privacy, so that attackers cannot distinguish the states that saturating counters are in and further infer sensitive information. To obtain theoretical guarantees, we use Markov chain to formalize the attack algorithm applied to the saturating counter, investigate into the optimal attack strategy and calculate the probability of successful attack. Furthermore, we find that the attacker is able to accurately guess the branch execution of the victim's process in the existing saturating counters. To avoid this, we design a new probabilistic saturating counter, which generalizes the existing conventional and probabilistic saturating counters. The guarantee of differential privacy is applied to deduce parameters of the new saturating counters so that the security requirement can be satisfied. We also theoretically calculate the misprediction rate when the saturating counter reaches the steady state. The experimental results on testing programs show that the calculated theoretical results agree with the experimental performances. Compared with the existing conventional and probabilistic saturating counters, when the parameters of our designed models are selected appropriately, the new saturating counters can not only ensure similar operational performance, but also establish strict security guarantee.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2021

Verifying Pufferfish Privacy in Hidden Markov Models

Pufferfish is a Bayesian privacy framework for designing and analyzing privacy mechanisms. It refines differential privacy, the current gold standard in data privacy, by allowing explicit prior knowledge in privacy analysis. Through these privacy frameworks, a number of privacy mechanisms have been developed in literature. In practice, privacy mechanisms often need be modified or adjusted to specific applications. Their privacy risks have to be re-evaluated for different circumstances. Moreover, computing devices only approximate continuous noises through floating-point computation, which is discrete in nature. Privacy proofs can thus be complicated and prone to errors. Such tedious tasks can be burdensome to average data curators. In this paper, we propose an automatic verification technique for Pufferfish privacy. We use hidden Markov models to specify and analyze discretized Pufferfish privacy mechanisms. We show that the Pufferfish verification problem in hidden Markov models is NP-hard. Using Satisfiability Modulo Theories solvers, we propose an algorithm to analyze privacy requirements. We implement our algorithm in a prototypical tool called FAIER, and present several case studies. Surprisingly, our case studies show that naïve discretization of well-established privacy mechanisms often fail, witnessed by counterexamples generated by FAIER. In discretized \emph{Above Threshold}, we show that it results in absolutely no privacy. Finally, we compare our approach with testing based approach on several case studies, and show that our verification technique can be combined with testing based approach for the purpose of (i) efficiently certifying counterexamples and (ii) obtaining a better lower bound for the privacy budget $ε$.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2017

A Novel Learning Algorithm for Büchi Automata based on Family of DFAs and Classification Trees

In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm to learn a Büchi automaton from a teacher who knows an $ω$-regular language. The algorithm is based on learning a formalism named family of DFAs (FDFAs) recently proposed by Angluin and Fisman[10]. The main catch is that we use a classification tree structure instead of the standard observation table structure. The worst case storage space required by our algorithm is quadratically better than the table-based algorithm proposed in [10]. We implement the first publicly available library ROLL (Regular Omega Language Learning ), which consists of all $ω$-regular learning algorithms available in the literature and the new algorithms proposed in this paper. Experimental results show that our tree-based algorithms have the best performance among others regarding the number of solved learning tasks.

cs.FL↗