arXiv subjects

Dhiraj Holden

Publications and source records attributed to Dhiraj Holden.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2020

Doubly-Efficient Pseudo-Deterministic Proofs

In [20] Goldwasser, Grossman and Holden introduced pseudo-deterministic interactive proofs for search problems where a powerful prover can convince a probabilistic polynomial time verifier that a solution to a search problem is canonical. They studied search problems for which polynomial time algorithms are not known and for which many solutions are possible. They showed that whereas there exists a constant round pseudo deterministic proof for graph isomorphism where the canonical solution is the lexicographically smallest isomorphism, the existence of pseudo-deterministic interactive proofs for NP-hard problems would imply the collapse of the polynomial time hierarchy. In this paper, we turn our attention to studying doubly-efficient pseudo-deterministic proofs for polynomial time search problems: pseudo-deterministic proofs with the extra requirement that the prover runtime is polynomial and the verifier runtime to verify that a solution is canonical is significantly lower than the complexity of finding any solution, canonical or otherwise. Naturally this question is particularly interesting for search problems for which a lower bound on its worst case complexity is known or has been widely conjectured. We show doubly-efficient pseudo-deterministic algorithms for a host of natural problems whose complexity has long been conjectured. In particular, we show a doubly efficient pseudo-deterministic NP proof for linear programming, 3-SUM and problems reducible to 3-SUM, the hitting set problem, and the Zero Weight Triangle problem and show a doubly-efficient pseudo-deterministic MA proof for the Orthogonal Vectors problem and the $k$-Clique problem.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

Non-Signaling Proofs with $O(\sqrt{\log n})$ Provers are in PSPACE

Non-signaling proofs, motivated by quantum computation, have found applications in cryptography and hardness of approximation. An important open problem is characterizing the power of no-signaling proofs. It is known that 2-prover no-signaling proofs are characterized by PSPACE, and that no-signaling proofs with $poly(n)$-provers are characterized by EXP. However, the power of $k$-prover no-signaling proofs, for $2 0$), then the corresponding 2-prover game has value at most $1 - 2^{dk^2}$ (for some constant~$d>0$). In the second route we show that the value of a sub-no-signaling game can be approximated in space that is polynomial in the communication complexity and exponential in the number of provers.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

A Note on Unconditional Subexponential-time Pseudo-deterministic Algorithms for BPP Search Problems

We show the first unconditional pseudo-determinism result for all of search-BPP. Specifically, we show that every BPP search problem can be computed pseudo-deterministically on average for infinitely many input lengths. In other words, for infinitely many input lengths and for any polynomial-time samplable distribution our algorithm succeeds in producing a unique answer (if one exists) with high probability over the distribution and the coins tossed.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

Pseudo-deterministic Proofs

We introduce pseudo-deterministic interactive proofs (psdAM): interactive proof systems for search problems where the verifier is guaranteed with high probability to output the same output on different executions. As in the case with classical interactive proofs, the verifier is a probabilistic polynomial time algorithm interacting with an untrusted powerful prover. We view pseudo-deterministic interactive proofs as an extension of the study of pseudo-deterministic randomized polynomial time algorithms: the goal of the latter is to find canonical solutions to search problems whereas the goal of the former is to prove that a solution to a search problem is canonical to a probabilistic polynomial time verifier. Alternatively, one may think of the powerful prover as aiding the probabilistic polynomial time verifier to find canonical solutions to search problems, with high probability over the randomness of the verifier. The challenge is that pseudo-determinism should hold not only with respect to the randomness, but also with respect to the prover: a malicious prover should not be able to cause the verifier to output a solution other than the unique canonical one.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

On the Power of Statistical Zero Knowledge

We examine the power of statistical zero knowledge proofs (captured by the complexity class SZK) and their variants. First, we give the strongest known relativized evidence that SZK contains hard problems, by exhibiting an oracle relative to which SZK (indeed, even NISZK) is not contained in the class UPP, containing those problems solvable by randomized algorithms with unbounded error. This answers an open question of Watrous from 2002 [Aar]. Second, we "lift" this oracle separation to the setting of communication complexity, thereby answering a question of Göös et al. (ICALP 2016). Third, we give relativized evidence that perfect zero knowledge proofs (captured by the class PZK) are weaker than general zero knowledge proofs. Specifically, we exhibit oracles relative to which SZK is not contained in PZK, NISZK is not contained in NIPZK, and PZK is not equal to coPZK. The first of these results answers a question raised in 1991 by Aiello and Håstad (Information and Computation), and the second answers a question of Lovett and Zhang (2016). We also describe additional applications of these results outside of structural complexity. The technical core of our results is a stronger hardness amplification theorem for approximate degree, which roughly says that composing the gapped-majority function with any function of high approximate degree yields a function with high threshold degree.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

Fast algorithmic self-assembly of simple shapes using random agitation

We study the power of uncontrolled random molecular movement in the nubot model of self-assembly. The nubot model is an asynchronous nondeterministic cellular automaton augmented with rigid-body movement rules (push/pull, deterministically and programmatically applied to specific monomers) and random agitations (nondeterministically applied to every monomer and direction with equal probability all of the time). Previous work on the nubot model showed how to build simple shapes such as lines and squares quickly---in expected time that is merely logarithmic of their size. These results crucially make use of the programmable rigid-body movement rule: the ability for a single monomer to control the movement of a large objects quickly, and only at a time and place of the programmers' choosing. However, in engineered molecular systems, molecular motion is largely uncontrolled and fundamentally random. This raises the question of whether similar results can be achieved in a more restrictive, and perhaps easier to justify, model where uncontrolled random movements, or agitations, are happening throughout the self-assembly process and are the only form of rigid-body movement. We show that this is indeed the case: we give a polylogarithmic expected time construction for squares using agitation, and a sublinear expected time construction to build a line. Such results are impossible in an agitation-free (and movement-free) setting and thus show the benefits of exploiting uncontrolled random movement.

cs.DS↗