Diana Rand | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Data Preservation in High Energy Physics: Global Report 2026

This document summarizes the contributions to the 5th DPHEP workshop March 5-6, 2026, CERN, and reflects the advancements since 2024, as well as future milestones and tendencies. Impressive progress in HEP data preservation is observed. Legacy data revival was showcased through successful reanalysis of archived data using contemporary methods, demonstrating the long-term scientific value of preservation. Sustainability challenges were noted, emphasizing the need for long-term funding and institutional support to maintain data preservation infrastructure, particularly for legacy experiments transitioning to archival modes. Innovative transverse projects display constant progress towards common technologies for a robust and transferrable DP. In particular, there is a clear shift toward automation, with increasing use of AI and machine learning for data curation, metadata extraction, and workflow optimization. Open science momentum is growing, with wider adoption of FAIR principles and open data policies, and experiments committing to public releases.

hep-ex↗

arXiv2021

Evolutionary algorithms for hyperparameter optimization in machine learning for application in high energy physics

The analysis of vast amounts of data constitutes a major challenge in modern high energy physics experiments. Machine learning (ML) methods, typically trained on simulated data, are often employed to facilitate this task. Several choices need to be made by the user when training the ML algorithm. In addition to deciding which ML algorithm to use and choosing suitable observables as inputs, users typically need to choose among a plethora of algorithm-specific parameters. We refer to parameters that need to be chosen by the user as hyperparameters. These are to be distinguished from parameters that the ML algorithm learns autonomously during the training, without intervention by the user. The choice of hyperparameters is conventionally done manually by the user and often has a significant impact on the performance of the ML algorithm. In this paper, we explore two evolutionary algorithms: particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA), for the purposes of performing the choice of optimal hyperparameter values in an autonomous manner. Both of these algorithms will be tested on different datasets and compared to alternative methods.

hep-ex↗