Reading Without a Reader: Large Language Models Collapse Reading and Writing into a Single Entangled Code
In the literate human brain, reading and writing doubly dissociate: a ventral decoding route (pure alexia) and a fronto-parietal encoding route (pure agraphia), sharing a partial orthographic core. A decoder-only large language model (LLM) drives both from one autoregressive path optimized on text (a \emph{cultural} invention, not an evolved instinct). We ask how entangled it is, comparing an input-side ``reading code'' $\mathbf{W}_{E}$ with an output-side ``writing code'' $\mathbf{W}_{U}$ via an index $\mathcal{E}\in[0,1]$ (CKA, Procrustes residual, mutual $k$-NN) calibrated against an independent-init floor and tied ceiling. On GPT-2, OPT and Pythia (14M--1.4B), untied models hold one \emph{coupled but sub-ceiling} code ($\mathcal{E}=0.23$--$0.35$, far above floor) on a non-monotonic couple-then-differentiate trajectory, $\mathbf{W}_{U}$ drifting $\sim$3.2$\times$ farther than $\mathbf{W}_{E}$ in every decile. Equally informative is a negative: the matching behavioural test, that comprehension and production fail together rather than dissociate, cannot be run. For minimal pairs the alexia analogue is empty by theorem: greedy production implies a vocabulary-wide argmax, so it wins the pairwise ranking. Differential-damage indices are not scale-identified: heavy-tailed damage makes linear standardizations collapse onto their larger term, and the rank transform fixing this is bounded, so its null saturates. Both scores also contain the target's log-probability, which alone explains most of their variance and manufactures the apparent coupling. We withdraw a coupling statistic, a cross-level bridge and a separation measure. In a model reading and writing off one next-token distribution, no output-side pair isolates either ability: entanglement needing no index to see. By analogy, not homology, this situates LLMs in the space of possible minds.