Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Dimitris Tsementzis

Publications and source records attributed to Dimitris Tsementzis.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2022

The Univalence Principle

The Univalence Principle is the statement that equivalent mathematical structures are indistinguishable. We prove a general version of this principle that applies to all set-based, categorical, and higher-categorical structures defined in a non-algebraic and space-based style, as well as models of higher-order theories such as topological spaces. In particular, we formulate a general definition of indiscernibility for objects of any such structure, and a corresponding univalence condition that generalizes Rezk's completeness condition for Segal spaces and ensures that all equivalences of structures are levelwise equivalences. Our work builds on Makkai's First-Order Logic with Dependent Sorts, but is expressed in Voevodsky's Univalent Foundations (UF), extending previous work on the Structure Identity Principle and univalent categories in UF. This enables indistinguishability to be expressed simply as identification, and yields a formal theory that is interpretable in classical homotopy theory, but also in other higher topos models. It follows that Univalent Foundations is a fully equivalence-invariant foundation for higher-categorical mathematics, as intended by Voevodsky.

math.CT↗
arXiv2020

A Higher Structure Identity Principle

The ordinary Structure Identity Principle states that any property of set-level structures (e.g., posets, groups, rings, fields) definable in Univalent Foundations is invariant under isomorphism: more specifically, identifications of structures coincide with isomorphisms. We prove a version of this principle for a wide range of higher-categorical structures, adapting FOLDS-signatures to specify a general class of structures, and using two-level type theory to treat all categorical dimensions uniformly. As in the previously known case of 1-categories (which is an instance of our theory), the structures themselves must satisfy a local univalence principle, stating that identifications coincide with "isomorphisms" between elements of the structure. Our main technical achievement is a definition of such isomorphisms, which we call "indiscernibilities", using only the dependency structure rather than any notion of composition.

math.LO↗
arXiv2017

First-Order Logic with Isomorphism

The Univalent Foundations requires a logic that allows us to define structures on homotopy types, similar to how first-order logic with equality ($\text{FOL}_=$) allows us to define structures on sets. We develop the syntax, semantics and deductive system for such a logic, which we call first-order logic with isomorphism ($\text{FOL}_{\cong}$). The syntax of $\text{FOL}_{\cong}$ extends $\text{FOL}_{=}$ in two ways. First, by incorporating into its signatures a notion of dependent sorts along the lines of Makkai's FOLDS as well as a notion of an $h$-level of each sort. Second, by specifying three new logical sorts within these signatures: isomorphism sorts, reflexivity predicates and transport structure. The semantics for $\text{FOL}_{\cong}$ are then defined in homotopy type theory with the isomorphism sorts interpreted as identity types, reflexivity predicates as relations picking out the trivial path, and transport structure as transport along a path. We then define a deductive system $\mathcal{D}_{\cong}$ for $\text{FOL}_{\cong}$ that encodes the sense in which the inhabitants of isomorphism sorts really do behave like isomorphisms and prove soundness of the rules of $\mathcal{D}_{\cong}$ with respect to its homotopy semantics. Finally, as an application, we prove that precategories, strict categories and univalent categories are axiomatizable in $\text{FOL}_{\cong}$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2017

A Higher Structure Identity Principle

We prove a Structure Identity Principle for theories defined on types of $h$-level 3 by defining a general notion of saturation for a large class of structures definable in the Univalent Foundations.

math.LO↗
arXiv2015

A Syntactic Characterization of Morita Equivalence

We characterize Morita equivalence of theories in the sense of Johnstone in terms of a new syntactic notion of a common definitional extension developed by Barrett and Halvorson for cartesian, regular, coherent, geometric and first-order theories. This provides a purely syntactic characterization of the relation between two theories that have equivalent categories of models naturally in any Grothendieck topos.

math.LO↗