arXiv2016
Future electromagnetic observations of black holes may allow us to test General Relativity in the strong-field regime. Such tests, however, require knowledge of rotating black hole solutions in modified gravity theories, a class of which does not admit the Kerr metric as a solution. Several rotating black hole solutions in modified theories have only been found in the slow-rotation approximation (i.e. assuming the spin angular momentum is much smaller than the mass squared). We here investigate whether the systematic error due to the approximate nature of these black hole metrics is small enough relative to the observational error to allow their use in electromagnetic observations to constrain deviations from General Relativity. We address this by considering whether electromagnetic observables constructed from a slow-rotation approximation to the Kerr metric can fit observables constructed from the full Kerr metric with systematic errors smaller than current observational errors. We focus on black hole shadow and continuum spectrum observations, as these are the least influenced by accretion disk physics, with current observational errors of about 10%. We find that the fractional systematic error introduced by using a second-order, slowly-rotating Kerr metric is at most 2% for shadows created by black holes with dimensionless spins $χ\leq0.6$. We also find that the systematic error introduced by using the slowly-rotating Kerr metric as an exact metric when constructing continuum spectrum observables is negligible for black holes with dimensionless spins of $χ\lesssim 0.9$. Our results suggest that the modified gravity solutions found in the slow-rotation approximation may be used to constrain realistic deviations from General Relativity with continuum spectrum and black hole shadow observations.