SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Diogo Rodrigues

Publications and source records attributed to Diogo Rodrigues.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Identity-Bound Academic Credentials on Blockchain: On-Chain Issuer Accreditation with ERC-3643 and OnchainID

Verifying academic credentials remains difficult: records are held by individual institutions in proprietary systems, verification is slow and manual, and counterfeit qualifications are widespread. Blockchain-based registries have been proposed as a remedy, but existing systems tend to anchor certificate hashes without binding them to a verifiable identity, without an explicit mechanism to accredit issuing institutions, and without support for correcting or revoking credentials once issued. This paper investigates whether an infrastructure designed for regulated financial instruments can be repurposed to close these gaps. We present the design of a registry for identity-bound academic credentials that composes OnchainID self-sovereign identities (ERC-734/ERC-735) with the T-REX suite (ERC-3643): its trusted-issuer registry becomes an on-chain issuer-accreditation whitelist, and each certificate is represented as a signed, updatable claim bound to a student's identity and verifiable by any third party without a wallet, while sensitive fields are kept off-chain. We make explicit the tension between a transferable-security-token standard and non-transferable credentials, clarifying which of its guarantees carry over. We validate the design with a reference implementation covering the full certificate life cycle and evaluate it in terms of gas cost, scalability, latency, and security, quantifying the overhead relative to a hash-anchoring baseline.

cs.CR

Scilit with the Integrated Impact Indicator Assessment

In this study, we systematically elucidate the background and functionality of the Scilit database and evaluate the feasibility and advantages of the comprehensive impact metrics I3 and I3/N, introduced within the Scilit framework. Using a matched dataset of 17,816 journals, we conduct a comparative analysis of Scilit I3/N, Journal Impact Factor, and CiteScore for 2023 and 2024, covering descriptive statistics and distributional characteristics from both disciplinary and publisher perspectives. The comparison reveals that the Scilit I3 and I3/N framework significantly outperforms traditional mean-based metrics in terms of coverage, methodological robustness, and disciplinary fairness. It provides a more accurate, diagnosable, and responsible solution for interdisciplinary journal impact assessment. Our research serves as a "getting started guide" for Scilit, offering scholars, librarians, and academic publishers in the fields of bibliometrics or scientometrics a valuable perspective for exploring I3 and I3/N within an inclusive database. This enables a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of disciplinary development and scientific progress. We advocate for piloting and validating this method in broader evaluation contexts to foster a more precise and diverse representation of scientific progress.

cs.DL