arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Diptaksho Palit.
In 2010, Seshadhri and Vondrák asked: is submodularity testable? For functions $f : \{ 0, 1 \}^n \to \mathbb{R}$, they gave a tester that makes $2^{O(\sqrt{n} \log n)}$ queries. We show that every tester, even an adaptive one with two-sided error, must make $2^{Ω(\sqrt{n})}$ queries, thereby concluding: submodularity is barely testable.
We revisit the classical problem of testing connectedness of graphs represented in the adjacency lists model and obtain optimal bounds. Specifically, we show that $\varepsilon$-testing connectedness of graphs with maximum degree at most $d$ requires $Ω(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon d})$ queries (when $\varepsilon \le \frac{1}{4d^5}$). Our result implies that the connectedness tester of Levi, Pallavoor, Raskhodnikova, and Varma ({\em ACM Trans.\ Comput.\ Theory, 2022}) is optimal. We also study the problem of testing $k$-edge-connectedness of both directed and undirected graphs of average degree $\overline{d}$ in the adjacency lists model and design a tester with query complexity $O(\frac{k}{\varepsilon} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon \overline{d}})$, improving upon the bounds by Forster, Nanongkai, Saranurak, Yang, and Yingchareonthawornchai (SODA 2020). Furthermore, we complement our upper bound by showing that every one-sided error $k$-edge-connectedness tester must make $Ω(k/\varepsilon)$ queries.
We study the query complexity of testing membership in structured string languages, focusing on Dyck languages and natural generalizations. A tester receives query access to a word and must distinguish valid inputs from words that are far in Hamming distance, while inspecting only a sublinear number of positions. Our results sharpen the boundary between constant-query testability and polynomial query complexity. First, we prove an $Ω(n^{2/5})$ lower bound for testing Dyck languages $D_m$ with any fixed number $m\ge2$ of parenthesis types, improving the previous $Ω(n^{1/5})$ lower bound of Fischer, Magniez, and Starikovskaya (SODA `18) and nearly matching their upper bound of $O(n^{2/5+o(1)})$. Furthermore, we show that all nonadaptive algorithms for these problems require $Ω(n^{1/2})$ queries. Our lower bounds use a Pólya-urn process to construct the hard distribution; Second, we identify a broad class of weighted-parenthesis languages, which we call {\em excursion languages,} that remain constant-query testable. These languages encode bounded-step walks that stay nonnegative and return to zero. For every fixed excursion language, we give a nonadaptive tester with query complexity $O(1/\varepsilon^2)$, and we prove this dependence on $\varepsilon$ is optimal, even for adaptive algorithms. As a special case, we obtain the tight $Θ(1/\varepsilon^2)$ query complexity of testing $D_1$, improving the previous $O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ upper bound and giving the first matching two-sided-error lower bound. Third, we construct a simple hard language, Hidden String, that is generated by a deterministic linear grammar but nevertheless requires $Ω(n^{2/5})$ adaptive queries and $Ω(n^{1/2})$ nonadaptive queries to test. This shows that polynomial query complexity appears even for highly restricted string languages.
We initiate the study of property testing for $k$-submodular functions, a higher-dimensional analogue of submodular functions defined on partial partitions of a ground set. While $k$-submodularity retains the diminishing-returns flavor of ordinary submodularity, it also introduces a pairwise monotonicity constraint comparing competing assignments of the same element. This additional local structure makes the testing problem qualitatively different from the classical case. Our results show a sharp contrast between distance regimes. In the $\ell_p$ regime for $p \geq 1$, we prove that every bounded $k$-submodular function is close to a junta on the hypergrid. Combined with an implicit-learning tester for hypergrid domains, this yields a constant-query tester for $k$-submodularity. In the Hamming distance regime, $k$-submodularity admits two qualitatively different local witnesses -- violated squares for diminishing marginal gains, and violated triangles for pairwise-monotonicity failures -- and the latter has no counterpart at $k=1$. We prove density theorems for both witness types via repair on filters and ideals of partial partitions, yielding non-adaptive, one-sided sub-exponential-query testers for the two component properties of $k$-submodularity. We then exhibit a configuration in which the two repair directions are forced into opposition on a shared vertex, identifying a structural barrier to combining these into a tester for the full property. Finally, for bounded-range functions, we give an adaptive tester for monotone $k$-submodularity via a pseudo-DNF representation and learning on the hypergrid. Several of the structural and learning tools developed here may be useful for testing other properties over product domains.
We initiate a systematic study of the computational complexity of property testing, focusing on the relationship between query and time complexity. While traditional work in property testing has emphasized query complexity, relatively little is known about the computational hardness of property testers. Our goal is to chart the landscape of time-query interplay and develop tools for proving time complexity lower bounds. Our first contribution is a pair of time-query hierarchy theorems for property testing. For all suitable nondecreasing functions $q(n)$ and $t(n)$ with $t(n)\geq q(n)$, we construct properties with query complexity $\tildeΘ(q(n))$ and time complexity $\tildeΩ(t(n))$. Our weak hierarchy holds unconditionally, whereas the strong version-assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis-provides better control over the time complexity of the constructed properties. We then turn to halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$, a fundamental class in property testing and learning theory. We study the problem of approximating the distance from the input function to the nearest halfspace within additive error $ε$. For the distribution-free distance approximation problem, known algorithms achieve query complexity $O(d/ε^2)$, but take time $\tildeΘ(1/ε^d)$. We provide a fine-grained justification for this gap: assuming the $k$-SUM conjecture, any algorithm must have running time $Ω(1/ε^{d/2})$. This fine-grained lower bound yields a provable separation between query and time complexity for a natural and well-studied (tolerant) testing problem. We also prove that any Statistical Query (SQ) algorithm under the standard Gaussian distribution requires $(1/ε)^{Ω(d)}$ queries if the queries are answered with additive error up to $ε^{Ω(d)}$, revealing a fundamental barrier even in the distribution-specific setting.
The model of relative-error property testing of Boolean functions has been the subject of significant recent research effort [CDH+24][CPPS25a][CPPS25b] In this paper we consider the problem of relative-error testing an unknown and arbitrary $f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ for the property of being a unate function, i.e. a function that is either monotone non-increasing or monotone non-decreasing in each of the $n$ input variables. Our first result is a one-sided non-adaptive algorithm for this problem that makes $\tilde{O}(\log(N)/ε)$ samples and queries, where $N=|f^{-1}(1)|$ is the number of satisfying assignments of the function that is being tested and the value of $N$ is given as an input parameter to the algorithm. Building on this algorithm, we next give a one-sided adaptive algorithm for this problem that does not need to be given the value of $N$ and with high probability makes $\tilde{O}(\log(N)/ε)$ samples and queries. We also give lower bounds for both adaptive and non-adaptive two-sided algorithms that are given the value of $N$ up to a constant multiplicative factor. In the non-adaptive case, our lower bounds essentially match the complexity of the algorithm that we provide.