arXiv subjects

Divesh Aggarwal

Publications and source records attributed to Divesh Aggarwal.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2020

A $2^{n/2}$-Time Algorithm for $\sqrt{n}$-SVP and $\sqrt{n}$-Hermite SVP, and an Improved Time-Approximation Tradeoff for (H)SVP

We show a $2^{n/2+o(n)}$-time algorithm that finds a (non-zero) vector in a lattice $\mathcal{L} \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ with norm at most $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})\cdot \min\{λ_1(\mathcal{L}), \det(\mathcal{L})^{1/n}\}$, where $λ_1(\mathcal{L})$ is the length of a shortest non-zero lattice vector and $\det(\mathcal{L})$ is the lattice determinant. Minkowski showed that $λ_1(\mathcal{L}) \leq \sqrt{n} \det(\mathcal{L})^{1/n}$ and that there exist lattices with $λ_1(\mathcal{L}) \geq Ω(\sqrt{n}) \cdot \det(\mathcal{L})^{1/n}$, so that our algorithm finds vectors that are as short as possible relative to the determinant (up to a polylogarithmic factor). The main technical contribution behind this result is new analysis of (a simpler variant of) an algorithm from arXiv:1412.7994, which was only previously known to solve less useful problems. To achieve this, we rely crucially on the ``reverse Minkowski theorem'' (conjectured by Dadush arXiv:1606.06913 and proven by arXiv:1611.05979), which can be thought of as a partial converse to the fact that $λ_1(\mathcal{L}) \leq \sqrt{n} \det(\mathcal{L})^{1/n}$. Previously, the fastest known algorithm for finding such a vector was the $2^{.802n + o(n)}$-time algorithm due to [Liu, Wang, Xu, and Zheng, 2011], which actually found a non-zero lattice vector with length $O(1) \cdot λ_1(\mathcal{L})$. Though we do not show how to find lattice vectors with this length in time $2^{n/2+o(n)}$, we do show that our algorithm suffices for the most important application of such algorithms: basis reduction. In particular, we show a modified version of Gama and Nguyen's slide-reduction algorithm [Gama and Nguyen, STOC 2008], which can be combined with the algorithm above to improve the time-length tradeoff for shortest-vector algorithms in nearly all regimes, including the regimes relevant to cryptography.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

Slide Reduction, Revisited---Filling the Gaps in SVP Approximation

We show how to generalize Gama and Nguyen's slide reduction algorithm [STOC '08] for solving the approximate Shortest Vector Problem over lattices (SVP). As a result, we show the fastest provably correct algorithm for $δ$-approximate SVP for all approximation factors $n^{1/2+\varepsilon} \leq δ\leq n^{O(1)}$. This is the range of approximation factors most relevant for cryptography.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2019

An improved constant in Banaszczyk's transference theorem

$ \newcommand{\R}{\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}} \newcommand{\lat}{\mathcal{L}} \newcommand{\ensuremath}[1]{#1} $We show that \[ μ(\lat) λ_1(\lat^*) < \big( 0.1275 + o(1) \big) \cdot n \; , \] where $μ(\lat)$ is the covering radius of an $n$-dimensional lattice $\lat \subset \R^n$ and $λ_1(\lat^*)$ is the length of the shortest non-zero vector in the dual lattice $\lat^*$. This improves on Banaszczyk's celebrated transference theorem (Math. Annal., 1993) by about 20%. Our proof follows Banaszczyk exactly, except in one step, where we replace a Fourier-analytic bound on the discrete Gaussian mass with a slightly stronger bound based on packing. The packing-based bound that we use was already proven by Aggarwal, Dadush, Regev, and Stephens-Davidowitz (STOC, 2015) in a very different context. Our contribution is therefore simply the observation that this implies a better transference theorem.

math.MG↗

arXiv2018

Improved algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem and the Closest Vector Problem in the infinity norm

Blomer and Naewe[BN09] modified the randomized sieving algorithm of Ajtai, Kumar and Sivakumar[AKS01] to solve the shortest vector problem (SVP). The algorithm starts with $N = 2^{O(n)}$ randomly chosen vectors in the lattice and employs a sieving procedure to iteratively obtain shorter vectors in the lattice. The running time of the sieving procedure is quadratic in $N$. We study this problem for the special but important case of the $\ell_\infty$ norm. We give a new sieving procedure that runs in time linear in $N$, thereby significantly improving the running time of the algorithm for SVP in the $\ell_\infty$ norm. As in [AKS02,BN09], we also extend this algorithm to obtain significantly faster algorithms for approximate versions of the shortest vector problem and the closest vector problem (CVP) in the $\ell_\infty$ norm. We also show that the heuristic sieving algorithms of Nguyen and Vidick[NV08] and Wang et al.[WLTB11] can also be analyzed in the $\ell_{\infty}$ norm. The main technical contribution in this part is to calculate the expected volume of intersection of a unit ball centred at origin and another ball of a different radius centred at a uniformly random point on the boundary of the unit ball. This might be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

A Quantum-Proof Non-Malleable Extractor, With Application to Privacy Amplification against Active Quantum Adversaries

In privacy amplification, two mutually trusted parties aim to amplify the secrecy of an initial shared secret $X$ in order to establish a shared private key $K$ by exchanging messages over an insecure communication channel. If the channel is authenticated the task can be solved in a single round of communication using a strong randomness extractor; choosing a quantum-proof extractor allows one to establish security against quantum adversaries. In the case that the channel is not authenticated, Dodis and Wichs (STOC'09) showed that the problem can be solved in two rounds of communication using a non-malleable extractor, a stronger pseudo-random construction than a strong extractor. We give the first construction of a non-malleable extractor that is secure against quantum adversaries. The extractor is based on a construction by Li (FOCS'12), and is able to extract from source of min-entropy rates larger than $1/2$. Combining this construction with a quantum-proof variant of the reduction of Dodis and Wichs, shown by Cohen and Vidick (unpublished), we obtain the first privacy amplification protocol secure against active quantum adversaries.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

(Gap/S)ETH Hardness of SVP

$ \newcommand{\problem}[1]{\ensuremath{\mathrm{#1}} } \newcommand{\SVP}{\problem{SVP}} \newcommand{\ensuremath}[1]{#1} $We prove the following quantitative hardness results for the Shortest Vector Problem in the $\ell_p$ norm ($\SVP_p$), where $n$ is the rank of the input lattice. $\bullet$ For "almost all" $p > p_0 \approx 2.1397$, there no $2^{n/C_p}$-time algorithm for $\SVP_p$ for some explicit constant $C_p > 0$ unless the (randomized) Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false. $\bullet$ For any $p > 2$, there is no $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm for $\SVP_p$ unless the (randomized) Gap-Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) is false. Furthermore, for each $p > 2$, there exists a constant $γ_p > 1$ such that the same result holds even for $γ_p$-approximate $\SVP_p$. $\bullet$ There is no $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm for $\SVP_p$ for any $1 \leq p \leq 2$ unless either (1) (non-uniform) Gap-ETH is false; or (2) there is no family of lattices with exponential kissing number in the $\ell_2$ norm. Furthermore, for each $1 \leq p \leq 2$, there exists a constant $γ_p > 1$ such that the same result holds even for $γ_p$-approximate $\SVP_p$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

Quantum attacks on Bitcoin, and how to protect against them

The key cryptographic protocols used to secure the internet and financial transactions of today are all susceptible to attack by the development of a sufficiently large quantum computer. One particular area at risk are cryptocurrencies, a market currently worth over 150 billion USD. We investigate the risk of Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies, to attacks by quantum computers. We find that the proof-of-work used by Bitcoin is relatively resistant to substantial speedup by quantum computers in the next 10 years, mainly because specialized ASIC miners are extremely fast compared to the estimated clock speed of near-term quantum computers. On the other hand, the elliptic curve signature scheme used by Bitcoin is much more at risk, and could be completely broken by a quantum computer as early as 2027, by the most optimistic estimates. We analyze an alternative proof-of-work called Momentum, based on finding collisions in a hash function, that is even more resistant to speedup by a quantum computer. We also review the available post-quantum signature schemes to see which one would best meet the security and efficiency requirements of blockchain applications.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

Just Take the Average! An Embarrassingly Simple $2^n$-Time Algorithm for SVP (and CVP)

We show a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time (and space) algorithm for the Shortest Vector Problem on lattices (SVP) that works by repeatedly running an embarrassingly simple "pair and average" sieving-like procedure on a list of lattice vectors. This matches the running time (and space) of the current fastest known algorithm, due to Aggarwal, Dadush, Regev, and Stephens-Davidowitz (ADRS, in STOC, 2015), with a far simpler algorithm. Our algorithm is in fact a modification of the ADRS algorithm, with a certain careful rejection sampling step removed. The correctness of our algorithm follows from a more general "meta-theorem," showing that such rejection sampling steps are unnecessary for a certain class of algorithms and use cases. In particular, this also applies to the related $2^{n + o(n)}$-time algorithm for the Closest Vector Problem (CVP), due to Aggarwal, Dadush, and Stephens-Davidowitz (ADS, in FOCS, 2015), yielding a similar embarrassingly simple algorithm for $γ$-approximate CVP for any $γ= 1+2^{-o(n/\log n)}$. (We can also remove the rejection sampling procedure from the $2^{n+o(n)}$-time ADS algorithm for exact CVP, but the resulting algorithm is still quite complicated.)

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

Revisiting the Sanders-Freiman-Ruzsa Theorem in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ and its Application to Non-malleable Codes

Non-malleable codes (NMCs) protect sensitive data against degrees of corruption that prohibit error detection, ensuring instead that a corrupted codeword decodes correctly or to something that bears little relation to the original message. The split-state model, in which codewords consist of two blocks, considers adversaries who tamper with either block arbitrarily but independently of the other. The simplest construction in this model, due to Aggarwal, Dodis, and Lovett (STOC'14), was shown to give NMCs sending k-bit messages to $O(k^7)$-bit codewords. It is conjectured, however, that the construction allows linear-length codewords. Towards resolving this conjecture, we show that the construction allows for code-length $O(k^5)$. This is achieved by analysing a special case of Sanders's Bogolyubov-Ruzsa theorem for general Abelian groups. Closely following the excellent exposition of this result for the group $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ by Lovett, we expose its dependence on $p$ for the group $\mathbb{F}_p^n$, where $p$ is a prime.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2015

Solving the Closest Vector Problem in $2^n$ Time--- The Discrete Gaussian Strikes Again!

We give a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space randomized algorithm for solving the exact Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on $n$-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm, the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^{n})$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^{n})$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris. We achieve our main result in three steps. First, we show how to modify the sampling algorithm from [ADRS15] to solve the problem of discrete Gaussian sampling over lattice shifts, $L- t$, with very low parameters. While the actual algorithm is a natural generalization of [ADRS15], the analysis uses substantial new ideas. This yields a $2^{n+o(n)}$-time algorithm for approximate CVP for any approximation factor $γ= 1+2^{-o(n/\log n)}$. Second, we show that the approximate closest vectors to a target vector $t$ can be grouped into "lower-dimensional clusters," and we use this to obtain a recursive reduction from exact CVP to a variant of approximate CVP that "behaves well with these clusters." Third, we show that our discrete Gaussian sampling algorithm can be used to solve this variant of approximate CVP. The analysis depends crucially on some new properties of the discrete Gaussian distribution and approximate closest vectors, which might be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Solving the Shortest Vector Problem in $2^n$ Time via Discrete Gaussian Sampling

We give a randomized $2^{n+o(n)}$-time and space algorithm for solving the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) on n-dimensional Euclidean lattices. This improves on the previous fastest algorithm: the deterministic $\widetilde{O}(4^n)$-time and $\widetilde{O}(2^n)$-space algorithm of Micciancio and Voulgaris (STOC 2010, SIAM J. Comp. 2013). In fact, we give a conceptually simple algorithm that solves the (in our opinion, even more interesting) problem of discrete Gaussian sampling (DGS). More specifically, we show how to sample $2^{n/2}$ vectors from the discrete Gaussian distribution at any parameter in $2^{n+o(n)}$ time and space. (Prior work only solved DGS for very large parameters.) Our SVP result then follows from a natural reduction from SVP to DGS. We also show that our DGS algorithm implies a $2^{n + o(n)}$-time algorithm that approximates the Closest Vector Problem to within a factor of $1.97$. In addition, we give a more refined algorithm for DGS above the so-called smoothing parameter of the lattice, which can generate $2^{n/2}$ discrete Gaussian samples in just $2^{n/2+o(n)}$ time and space. Among other things, this implies a $2^{n/2+o(n)}$-time and space algorithm for $1.93$-approximate decision SVP.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

A Note on Discrete Gaussian Combinations of Lattice Vectors

We analyze the distribution of $\sum_{i=1}^m v_i \bx_i$ where $\bx_1,...,\bx_m$ are fixed vectors from some lattice $\cL \subset \R^n$ (say $\Z^n$) and $v_1,...,v_m$ are chosen independently from a discrete Gaussian distribution over $\Z$. We show that under a natural constraint on $\bx_1,...,\bx_m$, if the $v_i$ are chosen from a wide enough Gaussian, the sum is statistically close to a discrete Gaussian over $\cL$. We also analyze the case of $\bx_1,...,\bx_m$ that are themselves chosen from a discrete Gaussian distribution (and fixed). Our results simplify and qualitatively improve upon a recent result by Agrawal, Gentry, Halevi, and Sahai \cite{AGHS13}.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2011

Improved hardness results for unique shortest vector problem

We give several improvements on the known hardness of the unique shortest vector problem. - We give a deterministic reduction from the shortest vector problem to the unique shortest vector problem. As a byproduct, we get deterministic NP-hardness for unique shortest vector problem in the $\ell_\infty$ norm. - We give a randomized reduction from SAT to uSVP_{1+1/poly(n)}. This shows that uSVP_{1+1/poly(n)} is NP-hard under randomized reductions. - We show that if GapSVP_γ\in coNP (or coAM) then uSVP_{\sqrtγ} \in coNP (coAM respectively). This simplifies previously known uSVP_{n^{1/4}} \in coAM proof by Cai \cite{Cai98} to uSVP_{(n/\log n)^{1/4}} \in coAM, and additionally generalizes it to uSVP_{n^{1/4}} \in coNP. - We give a deterministic reduction from search-uSVP_γto the decision-uSVP_{γ/2}. We also show that the decision-uSVP is {\bf NP}-hard for randomized reductions, which does not follow from Kumar-Sivakumar \cite{KS01}.

cs.CC↗