SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Divya Kappara

Publications and source records attributed to Divya Kappara.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Variable selection in spatial lag models using the focussed information criterion

Spatial regression models have a variety of applications in several fields ranging from economics to public health. Typically, it is of interest to select important exogenous predictors of the spatially autocorrelated response variable. In this paper, we propose variable selection in linear spatial lag models by means of the focussed information criterion (FIC). The FIC-based variable selection involves the minimization of the asymptotic risk in the estimation of a certain parametric focus function of interest under potential model misspecification. We systematically investigate the key asymptotics of the maximum likelihood estimators under the sequence of locally perturbed mutually contiguous probability models. Using these results, we obtain the expressions for the bias and the variance of the estimated focus leading to the desired FIC formula. We provide practically useful focus functions that account for various spatial characteristics such as mean response, variability in the estimation and spatial spillover effects. Furthermore, we develop an averaged version of the FIC that incorporates varying covariate levels while evaluating the models. The empirical performance of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through simulations and real data analysis.

stat.ME

Measuring spatial association and testing spatial independence based on short time course data

Spatial association measures for univariate static spatial data are widely used. When the data is in the form of a collection of spatial vectors with the same temporal domain of interest, we construct a measure of similarity between the regions' series, using Bergsma's correlation coefficient $\rho$. Due to the special properties of $\rho$, unlike other spatial association measures which test for spatial randomness, our statistic can account for spatial pairwise independence. We have derived the asymptotic behavior of our statistic under null (independence of the regions) and alternate cases (the regions are dependent). We explore the alternate scenario of spatial dependence further, using simulations for the SAR and SMA dependence models. Finally, we provide application to modelling and testing for the presence of spatial association in COVID-19 incidence data, by using our statistic on the residuals obtained after model fitting.

stat.ME

Assessing bivariate independence: Revisiting Bergsma's covariance

Bergsma (2006) proposed a covariance $\kappa$(X,Y) between random variables X and Y. He derived their asymptotic distributions under the null hypothesis of independence between X and Y. The non-null (dependent) case does not seem to have been studied in the literature. We derive several alternate expressions for $\kappa$. One of them leads us to a very intuitive estimator of $\kappa$(X,Y) that is a nice function of four naturally arising U-statistics. We derive the exact finite sample relation between all three estimates. The asymptotic distribution of our estimator, and hence also of the other two estimators, in the non-null (dependence) case, is then obtained by using the U-statistics central limit theorem. For specific parametric bivariate distributions, the value of $\kappa$ can be derived in terms of the natural dependence parameters of these distributions. In particular, we derive the formula for $\kappa$ when (X,Y) are distributed as Gumbel's bivariate exponential. We bring out various aspects of these estimators through extensive simulations from several prominent bivariate distributions. In particular, we investigate the empirical relationship between $\kappa$ and the dependence parameters, the distributional properties of the estimators, and the accuracy of these estimators. We also investigate the powers of these measures for testing independence, compare these among themselves, and with other well known such measures. Based on these exercises, the proposed estimator seems as good or better than its competitors both in terms of power and computing efficiency.

math.ST