arXiv subjects

Dmitry Gavinsky

Publications and source records attributed to Dmitry Gavinsky.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2018

A composition theorem for randomized query complexity via max conflict complexity

Let $R_\epsilon(\cdot)$ stand for the bounded-error randomized query complexity with error $\epsilon > 0$. For any relation $f \subseteq \{0,1\}^n \times S$ and partial Boolean function $g \subseteq \{0,1\}^m \times \{0,1\}$, we show that $R_{1/3}(f \circ g^n) \in \Omega(R_{4/9}(f) \cdot \sqrt{R_{1/3}(g)})$, where $f \circ g^n \subseteq (\{0,1\}^m)^n \times S$ is the composition of $f$ and $g$. We give an example of a relation $f$ and partial Boolean function $g$ for which this lower bound is tight. We prove our composition theorem by introducing a new complexity measure, the max conflict complexity $\bar \chi(g)$ of a partial Boolean function $g$. We show $\bar \chi(g) \in \Omega(\sqrt{R_{1/3}(g)})$ for any (partial) function $g$ and $R_{1/3}(f \circ g^n) \in \Omega(R_{4/9}(f) \cdot \bar \chi(g))$; these two bounds imply our composition result. We further show that $\bar \chi(g)$ is always at least as large as the sabotage complexity of $g$, introduced by Ben-David and Kothari.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

Quadratically Tight Relations for Randomized Query Complexity

Let $f:\{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ be a Boolean function. The certificate complexity $C(f)$ is a complexity measure that is quadratically tight for the zero-error randomized query complexity $R_0(f)$: $C(f) \leq R_0(f) \leq C(f)^2$. In this paper we study a new complexity measure that we call expectational certificate complexity $EC(f)$, which is also a quadratically tight bound on $R_0(f)$: $EC(f) \leq R_0(f) = O(EC(f)^2)$. We prove that $EC(f) \leq C(f) \leq EC(f)^2$ and show that there is a quadratic separation between the two, thus $EC(f)$ gives a tighter upper bound for $R_0(f)$. The measure is also related to the fractional certificate complexity $FC(f)$ as follows: $FC(f) \leq EC(f) = O(FC(f)^{3/2})$. This also connects to an open question by Aaronson whether $FC(f)$ is a quadratically tight bound for $R_0(f)$, as $EC(f)$ is in fact a relaxation of $FC(f)$. In the second part of the work, we upper bound the distributed query complexity $D^\mu_\epsilon(f)$ for product distributions $\mu$ by the square of the query corruption bound ($\mathrm{corr}_\epsilon(f)$) which improves upon a result of Harsha, Jain and Radhakrishnan [2015]. A similar statement for communication complexity is open.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2017

A Composition Theorem for Randomized Query Complexity

Let the randomized query complexity of a relation for error probability $\epsilon$ be denoted by $R_\epsilon(\cdot)$. We prove that for any relation $f \subseteq \{0,1\}^n \times \mathcal{R}$ and Boolean function $g:\{0,1\}^m \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, $R_{1/3}(f\circ g^n) = \Omega(R_{4/9}(f)\cdot R_{1/2-1/n^4}(g))$, where $f \circ g^n$ is the relation obtained by composing $f$ and $g$. We also show that $R_{1/3}\left(f \circ \left(g^\oplus_{O(\log n)}\right)^n\right)=\Omega(\log n \cdot R_{4/9}(f) \cdot R_{1/3}(g))$, where $g^\oplus_{O(\log n)}$ is the function obtained by composing the xor function on $O(\log n)$ bits and $g^t$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

On the Role of Shared Randomness in Simultaneous Communication

Two parties wish to carry out certain distributed computational tasks, and they are given access to a source of correlated random bits. It allows the parties to act in a correlated manner, which can be quite useful. But what happens if the shared randomness is not perfect? In this work, we initiate the study of the power of different sources of shared randomness in communication complexity. This is done in the setting of simultaneous message passing (SMP) model of communication complexity, which is one of the most suitable models for studying the resource of shared randomness. Toward characterising the power of various sources of shared randomness, we introduce a measure for the quality of a source - we call it collision complexity. Our results show that the collision complexity tightly characterises the power of a (shared) randomness resource in the SMP model. Of independent interest is our demonstration that even the weakest sources of shared randomness can in some cases increase the power of SMP substantially: the equality function can be solved very efficiently with virtually any nontrivial shared randomness.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2015

Correlation in Hard Distributions in Communication Complexity

We study the effect that the amount of correlation in a bipartite distribution has on the communication complexity of a problem under that distribution. We introduce a new family of complexity measures that interpolates between the two previously studied extreme cases: the (standard) randomised communication complexity and the case of distributional complexity under product distributions. We give a tight characterisation of the randomised complexity of Disjointness under distributions with mutual information $k$, showing that it is $\Theta(\sqrt{n(k+1)})$ for all $0\leq k\leq n$. This smoothly interpolates between the lower bounds of Babai, Frankl and Simon for the product distribution case ($k=0$), and the bound of Razborov for the randomised case. The upper bounds improve and generalise what was known for product distributions, and imply that any tight bound for Disjointness needs $\Omega(n)$ bits of mutual information in the corresponding distribution. We study the same question in the distributional quantum setting, and show a lower bound of $\Omega((n(k+1))^{1/4})$, and an upper bound, matching up to a logarithmic factor. We show that there are total Boolean functions $f_d$ on $2n$ inputs that have distributional communication complexity $O(\log n)$ under all distributions of information up to $o(n)$, while the (interactive) distributional complexity maximised over all distributions is $\Theta(\log d)$ for $6n\leq d\leq 2^{n/100}$. We show that in the setting of one-way communication under product distributions, the dependence of communication cost on the allowed error $\epsilon$ is multiplicative in $\log(1/\epsilon)$ -- the previous upper bounds had the dependence of more than $1/\epsilon$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2013

Shared Randomness and Quantum Communication in the Multi-Party Model

We study shared randomness in the context of multi-party number-in-hand communication protocols in the simultaneous message passing model. We show that with three or more players, shared randomness exhibits new interesting properties that have no direct analogues in the two-party case. First, we demonstrate a hierarchy of modes of shared randomness, with the usual shared randomness where all parties access the same random string as the strongest form in the hierarchy. We show exponential separations between its levels, and some of our bounds may be of independent interest. For example, we show that the equality function can be solved by a protocol of constant length using the weakest form of shared randomness, which we call "XOR-shared randomness." Second, we show that quantum communication cannot replace shared randomness in the k-party case, where k >= 3 is any constant. We demonstrate a promise function GP_k that can be computed by a classical protocol of constant length when (the strongest form of) shared randomness is available, but any quantum protocol without shared randomness must send n^Omega(1) qubits to compute it. Moreover, the quantum complexity of GP_k remains n^Omega(1) even if the "second strongest" mode of shared randomness is available. While a somewhat similar separation was already known in the two-party case, in the multi-party case our statement is qualitatively stronger: * In the two-party case, only a relational communication problem with similar properties is known. * In the two-party case, the gap between the two complexities of a problem can be at most exponential, as it is known that 2^(O(c)) log n qubits can always replace shared randomness in any c-bit protocol. Our bounds imply that with quantum communication alone, in general, it is not possible to simulate efficiently even a three-bit three-party classical protocol that uses shared randomness.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2012

A quantum query algorithm for the graph collision problem

We construct a new quantum algorithm for the graph collision problem; that is, the problem of deciding whether the set of marked vertices contains a pair of adjacent vertices in a known graph G. The query complexity of our algorithm is O(sqrt(n)+sqrt(alpha*(G))), where n is the number of vertices and alpha*(G) is the maximum total degree of the vertices in an independent set of G. Notably, if G is a random graph where every edge is present with a fixed probability independently of other edges, then our algorithm requires O(sqrt(n log n)) queries on most graphs, which is optimal up to the sqrt(log n) factor on most graphs.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2011

Quantum algorithm for the Boolean hidden shift problem

The hidden shift problem is a natural place to look for new separations between classical and quantum models of computation. One advantage of this problem is its flexibility, since it can be defined for a whole range of functions and a whole range of underlying groups. In a way, this distinguishes it from the hidden subgroup problem where more stringent requirements about the existence of a periodic subgroup have to be made. And yet, the hidden shift problem proves to be rich enough to capture interesting features of problems of algebraic, geometric, and combinatorial flavor. We present a quantum algorithm to identify the hidden shift for any Boolean function. Using Fourier analysis for Boolean functions we relate the time and query complexity of the algorithm to an intrinsic property of the function, namely its minimum influence. We show that for randomly chosen functions the time complexity of the algorithm is polynomial. Based on this we show an average case exponential separation between classical and quantum time complexity. A perhaps interesting aspect of this work is that, while the extremal case of the Boolean hidden shift problem over so-called bent functions can be reduced to a hidden subgroup problem over an abelian group, the more general case studied here does not seem to allow such a reduction.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2008

Simultaneous Communication Protocols with Quantum and Classical Messages

We study the simultaneous message passing (SMP) model of communication complexity, for the case where one party is quantum and the other is classical. We show that in an SMP protocol that computes some function with the first party sending q qubits and the second sending c classical bits, the quantum message can be replaced by a randomized message of O(qc) classical bits, as well as by a deterministic message of O(q c log q) classical bits. Our proofs rely heavily on earlier results due to Scott Aaronson. In particular, our results imply that quantum-classical protocols need to send Omega(sqrt{n/log n}) bits/qubits to compute Equality on n-bit strings, and hence are not significantly better than classical-classical protocols (and are much worse than quantum-quantum protocols such as quantum fingerprinting). This essentially answers a recent question of Wim van Dam. Our results also imply, more generally, that there are no superpolynomial separations between quantum-classical and classical-classical SMP protocols for functional problems. This contrasts with the situation for relational problems, where exponential gaps between quantum-classical and classical-classical SMP protocols are known. We show that this surprising situation cannot arise in purely classical models: there, an exponential separation for a relational problem can be converted into an exponential separation for a functional problem.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2007

Entanglement-Resistant Two-Prover Interactive Proof Systems and Non-Adaptive Private Information Retrieval Systems

We show that, for any language in NP, there is an entanglement-resistant constant-bit two-prover interactive proof system with a constant completeness vs. soundness gap. The previously proposed classical two-prover constant-bit interactive proof systems are known not to be entanglement-resistant. This is currently the strongest expressive power of any known constant-bit answer multi-prover interactive proof system that achieves a constant gap. Our result is based on an "oracularizing" property of certain private information retrieval systems, which may be of independent interest.

quant-ph↗