arXiv subjects

Dominik Fuchß

Publications and source records attributed to Dominik Fuchß.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The ARDoCo Tool Landscape: REST API, TraceView, and TraceViz for Architecture Traceability

Context and Problem. Software development produces interrelated artifacts like software architecture documentation (SAD), software architecture models (SAMs), and source code, whose relationships are essential for maintenance and consistency checking. However, automatically recovering links between these artifacts (traceability link recovery (TLR)) remains difficult to deploy in practice. Method and Aim. We present an accessible tool landscape for ARDoCo's TLR approaches: the ARDoCo REST API exposes four TLR pipelines (SAD-SAM, SAM-Code, SAD-Code, and SAD-SAM-Code) via HTTP endpoints with asynchronous execution and caching; TraceView is a browser-based frontend with a guided wizard and interactive multi-panel exploration of recovered links and inconsistencies; and TraceViz, which is a VS Code extension that overlays trace links directly onto documentation in the IDE. Results and Conclusion. All three components are publicly deployed and usable. A preliminary study for TraceViz's in-IDE visualization confirmed that it improves developer comprehension during software understanding tasks. The tool landscape makes state-of-the-art TLR accessible to architects, developers, and tool integrators. Video. We provide a screencast of our ARDoCo Tool Landscape and how it is used here: https://youtu.be/IOTEPZQ3tVs

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

The EVerest Dataset for Secure Software Engineering

End-to-end security verification, from requirements through architecture to code, requires datasets that span all three artifact types with fine-grained security labels. No existing dataset provides this combination. We present the EVerest dataset, a multi-artifact resource based on EVerest, an industry-driven open-source software stack for electric vehicle charging stations. The dataset includes 84 manually elicited security requirements annotated with security objectives, 1,445 fine-grained security elements (components, entities, data, data flows, states, etc.), acceptance windows, coreferences, and architectural trace links, as well as the EVerest software architecture model, source code, and natural language documentation. It enables research on security requirements classification, named entity recognition, architectural trace linking, and design-time or code-level security verification. During dataset creation, a real security weakness (CWE-1295) was identified, disclosed to the project maintainers, and subsequently fixed. The dataset is publicly available. A short video is available at https://youtu.be/pnn1uqpomvQ.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Who's Who? LLM-assisted Software Traceability with Architecture Entity Recognition

Identifying architecturally relevant entities in textual artifacts is crucial for Traceability Link Recovery (TLR) between Software Architecture Documentation (SAD) and source code. While Software Architecture Models (SAMs) can bridge the semantic gap between these artifacts, their manual creation is time-consuming. LLMs offer new capabilities for extracting architectural entities from SAD and source code to construct SAMs automatically or establish direct trace links. This paper extends our ICSA 2025 paper [19], which introduced Extracting Architecture (ExArch) for LLM-based architecture component name extraction. The extension contributes the novel Architecture Traceability with Entity Matching via Semantic inference (ArTEMiS) approach, an extended evaluation with additional LLMs, configurations, a revised benchmark, and a combined evaluation of both approaches. Specifically, this paper presents the following approaches: ExArch extracts component names as simple SAMs from SAD and source code to eliminate the need for manual SAM creation, while ArTEMiS identifies architectural entities in documentation and matches them with (manually or automatically generated) SAM entities. Our evaluation compares against state-of-the-art approaches SWATTR, TransArC and ArDoCode. TransArC achieves strong performance (F1: 0.87) but requires manually created SAMs; ExArch achieves comparable results (F1: 0.86) using only SAD and code. ArTEMiS is on par with the traditional heuristic-based SWATTR (F1: 0.81) and can successfully replace it when integrated with TransArC. The combination of ArTEMiS and ExArch outperforms ArDoCode, the best baseline without manual SAMs. Our results demonstrate that LLMs can effectively identify architectural entities in textual artifacts, enabling automated SAM generation and TLR, making architecture-code traceability more practical and accessible.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

An Experience Report on a Pedagogically Controlled, Curriculum-Constrained AI Tutor for SE Education

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education continues to evoke both promise and skepticism. While past waves of technological optimism often fell short, recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have revived the vision of scalable, individualized tutoring. This paper presents the design and pilot evaluation of RockStartIT Tutor, an AI-powered assistant developed for a digital programming and computational thinking course within the RockStartIT initiative. Powered by GPT-4 via OpenAI's Assistant API, the tutor employs a novel prompting strategy and a modular, semantically tagged knowledge base to deliver context-aware, personalized, and curriculum-constrained support for secondary school students. We evaluated the system using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with 13 students and teachers. Learners appreciated the low-stakes environment for asking questions and receiving scaffolded guidance. Educators emphasized the system's potential to reduce cognitive load during independent tasks and complement classroom teaching. Key challenges include prototype limitations, a small sample size, and the need for long-term studies with the target age group. Our findings highlight a pragmatic approach to AI integration that requires no model training, using structure and prompts to shape behavior. We position AI tutors not as teacher replacements but as enabling tools that extend feedback access, foster inquiry, and support what schools do best: help students learn.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Software Architecture Meets LLMs: A Systematic Literature Review

Large Language Models (LLMs) are used for many different software engineering tasks. In software architecture, they have been applied to tasks such as classification of design decisions, detection of design patterns, and generation of software architecture design from requirements. However, there is little overview on how well they work, what challenges exist, and what open problems remain. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review on the use of LLMs in software architecture. We analyze 18 research articles to answer five research questions, such as which software architecture tasks LLMs are used for, how much automation they provide, which models and techniques are used, and how these approaches are evaluated. Our findings show that while LLMs are increasingly applied to a variety of software architecture tasks and often outperform baselines, some areas, such as generating source code from architectural design, cloud-native computing and architecture, and checking conformance remain underexplored. Although current approaches mostly use simple prompting techniques, we identify a growing research interest in refining LLM-based approaches by integrating advanced techniques.

cs.SE↗