Donatella Genovese | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Authorship attribution and aesthetic evaluation of AI poetry: a case study with Haiku

This paper investigates the generation and human evaluation of Japanese haiku by contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on authorship perception and aesthetic judgment within a constrained poetic form. Using a few-shot prompting strategy, Japanese haiku were generated across a heterogeneous set of large language models, including open- and closed-source systems, medium-scale and large-scale architectures, models with native or adapted Japanese support, and multilingual proprietary models. These AI-generated haiku were combined with human-written ones and presented in a questionnaire distributed to students at Japanese universities in Tokyo. The survey assessed whether respondents could distinguish between AI-generated and human-written haiku and which cues informed their judgments. Recognition accuracy varied across models. GPT-5, Gemini 2.5, and StableLM-7B performed at approximately chance level (approx 0.50), whereas LLM-JP, Gemma-2B, and LLaMA-2 showed moderate detectability (approx 0.59-0.67). However, recognition was strongly item-dependent. Ratings of fluency, coherence, poeticness, and related aesthetic dimensions predicted perceived humanness but not correct classification, indicating an attribution bias linked to aesthetic evaluation and revealing a dissociation between aesthetic evaluation and true authorship detection. The extended analysis additionally examines generation-constraint adherence, participant-level characteristics, and exploratory LLM-based evaluations of haiku authorship. Overall, the findings suggest that as LLMs improve, surface-level creative plausibility may reduce reliable human discrimination within constrained poetic settings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Mixture-of-Experts Graph Transformers for Interpretable Particle Collision Detection

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN produces immense volumes of complex data from high-energy particle collisions, demanding sophisticated analytical techniques for effective interpretation. Neural Networks, including Graph Neural Networks, have shown promise in tasks such as event classification and object identification by representing collisions as graphs. However, while Graph Neural Networks excel in predictive accuracy, their "black box" nature often limits their interpretability, making it difficult to trust their decision-making processes. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that combines a Graph Transformer model with Mixture-of-Expert layers to achieve high predictive performance while embedding interpretability into the architecture. By leveraging attention maps and expert specialization, the model offers insights into its internal decision-making, linking predictions to physics-informed features. We evaluate the model on simulated events from the ATLAS experiment, focusing on distinguishing rare Supersymmetric signal events from Standard Model background. Our results highlight that the model achieves competitive classification accuracy while providing interpretable outputs that align with known physics, demonstrating its potential as a robust and transparent tool for high-energy physics data analysis. This approach underscores the importance of explainability in machine learning methods applied to high energy physics, offering a path toward greater trust in AI-driven discoveries.

cs.LG↗