Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Douglas E. Faries

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas E. Faries.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Estimating optimal interpretable individualized treatment regimes from a classification perspective using adaptive LASSO

Real-world data (RWD) gains growing interests to provide a representative sample of the population for selecting the optimal treatment options. However, existing complex black box methods for estimating individualized treatment rules (ITR) from RWD have problems in interpretability and convergence. Providing an interpretable and sparse ITR can be used to overcome the limitation of existing methods. We developed an algorithm using Adaptive LASSO to predict optimal interpretable linear ITR in the RWD. To encourage sparsity, we obtain an ITR by minimizing the risk function with various types of penalties and different methods of contrast estimation. Simulation studies were conducted to select the best configuration and to compare the novel algorithm with the existing state-of-the-art methods. The proposed algorithm was applied to RWD to predict the optimal interpretable ITR. Simulations show that adaptive LASSO had the highest rates of correctly selected variables and augmented inverse probability weighting with Super Learner performed best for estimating treatment contrast. Our method had a better performance than causal forest and R-learning in terms of the value function and variable selection. The proposed algorithm can strike a balance between the interpretability of estimated ITR (by selecting a small set of important variables) and its value.

stat.ME↗

Double Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Average Treatment Effects: A Comparative Study

Observational cohort studies are increasingly being used for comparative effectiveness research to assess the safety of therapeutics. Recently, various doubly robust methods have been proposed for average treatment effect estimation by combining the treatment model and the outcome model via different vehicles, such as matching, weighting, and regression. The key advantage of doubly robust estimators is that they require either the treatment model or the outcome model to be correctly specified to obtain a consistent estimator of average treatment effects, and therefore lead to a more accurate and often more precise inference. However, little work has been done to understand how doubly robust estimators differ due to their unique strategies of using the treatment and outcome models and how machine learning techniques can be combined to boost their performance, which we call double machine learning estimators. Here we examine multiple popular doubly robust methods and compare their performance using different treatment and outcome modeling via extensive simulations and a real-world application. We found that incorporating machine learning with doubly robust estimators such as the targeted maximum likelihood estimator gives the best overall performance. Practical guidance on how to apply doubly robust estimators is provided.

stat.ME↗

Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio

Propensity score matching is commonly used to draw causal inference from observational survival data. However, its asymptotic properties have yet to be established, and variance estimation is still open to debate. We derive the statistical properties of the propensity score matching estimator of the marginal causal hazard ratio based on matching with replacement and a fixed number of matches. We also propose a double-resampling technique for variance estimation that takes into account the uncertainty due to propensity score estimation prior to matching.

stat.ME↗