arXiv subjects

Douglas Faries

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas Faries.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Medical Product Development and Evaluation Using Real World Evidence

The American Statistical Association Biopharmaceutical Section (ASA BIOP) scientific working group on real-world evidence (RWE) has been making continuous, extended efforts towards a goal of supporting and advancing regulatory science with respect to clinical studies intended to use real-world data for evidence generation for the purpose of medical product development and evaluation (i.e., RWE studies). In 2023, the working group published a manuscript delineating challenges and opportunities in constructing estimands for RWE studies following the framework in ICH E9(R1) guidance on estimand and sensitivity analysis. As a follow-up task, we describe the other issue, sensitivity analysis. Although the FDA's definition of RWE studies includes randomized trials using RWD as a primary source of evidence generation such as pragmatic trials, here we focus on non-randomized RWE studies and the issue of unmeasured confounding which is a major source of bias for most RWE studies. We review the availability and applicability of sensitivity analysis methods for different types of unmeasured confounding. We also provide some practical and regulatory considerations on using sensitivity analysis for such RWE studies. Then, we use a plasmode case study to demonstrate realistic ways to interpret sensitivity analysis results in supporting regulatory decision-making. We conclude with a brief discussion.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Doubly protected estimation for survival outcomes utilizing external controls for randomized clinical trials

Censored survival data are common in clinical trials, but small control groups can pose challenges, particularly in rare diseases or where balanced randomization is impractical. Recent approaches leverage external controls from historical studies or real-world data to strengthen treatment evaluation for survival outcomes. However, using external controls directly may introduce biases due to data heterogeneity. We propose a doubly protected estimator for the treatment-specific restricted mean survival time difference that is more efficient than trial-only estimators and mitigates biases from external data. Our method adjusts for covariate shifts via doubly robust estimation and addresses outcome drift using the DR-Learner for selective borrowing. The approach can incorporate machine learning to approximate survival curves and detect outcome drifts without strict parametric assumptions, borrowing only comparable external controls. Extensive simulation studies and a real-data application evaluating the efficacy of Galcanezumab in mitigating migraine headaches have been conducted to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Improving randomized controlled trial analysis via data-adaptive borrowing

In recent years, real-world external controls have grown in popularity as a tool to empower randomized placebo-controlled trials, particularly in rare diseases or cases where balanced randomization is unethical or impractical. However, as external controls are not always comparable to the trials, direct borrowing without scrutiny may heavily bias the treatment effect estimator. Our paper proposes a data-adaptive integrative framework capable of preventing unknown biases of the external controls. The adaptive nature is achieved by dynamically sorting out a comparable subset of the external controls via bias penalization. Our proposed method can simultaneously achieve (a) the semiparametric efficiency bound when the external controls are comparable and (b) selective borrowing that mitigates the impact of the existence of incomparable external controls. Furthermore, we establish statistical guarantees, including consistency, asymptotic distribution, and inference, providing type-I error control and good power. Extensive simulations and two real-data applications show that the proposed method leads to improved performance over the trial-only estimator across various bias-generating scenarios.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Real Effect or Bias? Best Practices for Evaluating the Robustness of Real-World Evidence through Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding

The assumption of no unmeasured confounders is a critical but unverifiable assumption required for causal inference yet quantitative sensitivity analyses to assess robustness of real-world evidence remains underutilized. The lack of use is likely in part due to complexity of implementation and often specific and restrictive data requirements required for application of each method. With the advent of sensitivity analyses methods that are broadly applicable in that they do not require identification of a specific unmeasured confounder, along with publicly available code for implementation, roadblocks toward broader use are decreasing. To spur greater application, here we present a best practice guidance to address the potential for unmeasured confounding at both the design and analysis stages, including a set of framing questions and an analytic toolbox for researchers. The questions at the design stage guide the research through steps evaluating the potential robustness of the design while encouraging gathering of additional data to reduce uncertainty due to potential confounding. At the analysis stage, the questions guide researchers to quantifying the robustness of the observed result and providing researchers with a clearer indication of the robustness of their conclusions. We demonstrate the application of the guidance using simulated data based on a real-world fibromyalgia study, applying multiple methods from our analytic toolbox for illustration purposes.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2015

Propensity Score Matching and Subclassification in Observational Studies with Multi-level Treatments

In this paper, we develop new methods for estimating average treatment effects in observational studies, focusing on settings with more than two treatment levels under unconfoundedness given pre-treatment variables. We emphasize subclassification and matching methods which have been found to be effective in the binary treatment literature and which are among the most popular methods in that setting. Whereas the literature has suggested that these particular propensity-based methods do not naturally extend to the multi-level treatment case, we show, using the concept of weak unconfoundedness, that adjusting for or matching on a scalar function of the pre-treatment variables removes all biases associated with observed pre-treatment variables. We apply the proposed methods to an analysis of the effect of treatments for fibromyalgia. We also carry out a simulation study to assess the finite sample performance of the methods relative to previously proposed methods.

stat.ME↗