SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Douglas M Hawkins

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas M Hawkins.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiple Instrument Methods Comparison by Precision weighted Deming Regression

In methods comparison (MC) studies, specimens are tested using two or more instruments with the objective of establishing the statistical relationship between the different instruments readings. Unlike regular regression, this is an errors in variables problem. Relationships may be fitted parametrically (Deming regression) or non-parametrically (Passing Bablok or PB regression.) In clinical chemistry settings, the measurement variability is rarely constant, but generally increases with increasing analyte values. Precision weighted Deming regression models this variability and incorporates it into the fitting. The simplest setting of comparing two instruments is discussed in (1) and implemented in an R package (2). PB makes minimal distributional assumptions. Its classical two-instrument implementation has recently been extended to multiple instruments (3). This work extends the two-instrument Deming model of (1) to multiple instruments, developing algorithms for fitting, for formal inference, for residual analysis, and for outlier detection and diagnosis.

stat.AP

Precision Profile Weighted Deming Regression for Methods Comparison

Errors in variables (Deming) regression of measurements spanning a wide range of values requires appropriate weighting to reflect nonconstant variance. Precision profile models, mathematical relationships between measurement variance and mean, are a route to these weights. The paper describes a methodology combining general precision profile models with Deming regression and described R routines for the resulting calculations.

stat.CO

Testing Normality of Data Transformed by Maximum Likelihood Box Cox

Transforming a random variable to improve its normality leads to a followup test for whether the transformed variable follows a normal distribution. Previous work has shown that the Anderson Darling test for normality suffers from resubstitution bias following Box-Cox transformation, and indicates normality much too often. The work reported here extends this by adding the Shapiro-Wilk statistic and the two-parameter Box Cox transformation, all of which show severe bias. We also develop a recalibration to correct the bias in all four settings. The methodology was motivated by finding reference ranges in biomarker studies where parametric analysis, possibly on a power-transformed measurand, can be much more informative than nonparametric. Setting environmental standards illustrates another potential application.

stat.ME