SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Dylan A Mordaunt

Publications and source records attributed to Dylan A Mordaunt.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

vop_poc_nz: A Python Framework for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Perspective Analysis

Health economic evaluations are sensitive to the choice of analytical perspective (e.g., health system vs. societal). We present vop_poc_nz, a Python package for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA), Markov cohort modeling, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, value of information, and explicit comparison of analytical perspectives. We define Value of Perspective (VoP) as a directional expected opportunity loss: the welfare loss, measured under a declared reference perspective, when decisions are selected under another perspective. Five synthetic Aotearoa New Zealand demonstration models produced deterministic decision discordance in two cases at a NZ$20,000/QALY threshold. Seeded probabilistic analysis estimated mean per-person directional VoP of NZ$128,706 [$0, $279,088] for smoking cessation and NZ$30,853 [$0, $89,122] for housing insulation (95% simulation intervals in brackets); the other three cases had zero loss under the simulated strategy choices. These values test the software workflow and are not estimates for policy adoption. Release 0.2.3 supports Python 3.12-3.14 and records typed inputs, random seeds, software versions, and Arrow-schema identities for reproducible analysis.

econ.GN

FOI-O: A global ontology and verification framework for Freedom of Information process modelling

Public official-information request records contain process signals. They can support research, workflow review, and analyst-led assessment. Yet they also mix observed correspondence, platform states, inferred events, and legal outcomes. FOI-O is a reusable process-modelling method and verification infrastructure for Freedom of Information administration. It is a global model that began with the New Zealand Official Information Act and has since iterated through the Australian Commonwealth and New South Wales settings. The NZ package remains the mature reference implementation; the Australian work remains provisional pending empirical evaluation and jurisdiction-specific legal validation. FOI-O models request records, observed correspondence, controlled vocabularies, provenance, review queues, release metadata, and bounded analysis rules. Legally meaningful outcomes require certification by an authorised decision-maker. Its typed operational and semantic contracts are supported by deterministic examples, process models, fixture-only process-mining exports, quality gates, and tests. This article describes the motivation, architecture, ontology-development method, its versioned extraction and review protocol, how related repositories share data and evidence, and how the method may be adapted for Australia, validation evidence, and implementation boundaries. The project is not legal advice, is not an official government publication, and does not certify release, refusal, redaction, charging, extension, transfer, complaint, or publication outcomes.

econ.GN