Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

E. E. Fenimore

Publications and source records attributed to E. E. Fenimore.

58 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Expanding Relativistic Shells and Gamma-Ray Burst Temporal Structure

Many models of cosmological gamma-ray bursts involve the sudden release of $\sim 10^{51}$ erg which produce shells which expand at relativistic speeds (Lorentz $Γ$ factors of $10^{2-3}$). We investigate the kinematic limits on the source size due to the observed time structure in three types of bursts: short spikes, FREDs (Fast Rise, Exponentail decay), and long complex bursts. The emitting shell keeps up with the photons it produces reducing apparent durations by $Γ^2$ so that source sizes can be very large ($2cΓ^2 T_{dur}). However, the thickness of the emitting region is not effected by the shell motion so it must always be small, $cΔT$ where $ΔT$ is the subpeak time scale. We argue that one can only view the bulk motion head-on so it is inappropriate to treat GRBs as viewing the sides of a jet. Although photons come from a region within an angle $Γ^{-1}$, we show that the curvature of the shell within that angle creates delays comparable to those associated with the duration of the event. As a result, most bursts should be like FREDs with sharp rises related to how long the shell emits and power law decays related to how long the shell expanded before becoming gamma-ray active. Few bursts have the long decay phases required for large shells resulting in unacceptable high densities for ISM objects to cause the observed subpeaks. To be consistent with the observations, perhaps very thick shells (which act as parallel slabs) are required to avoid the effects of the curvature, or the duration is dictated by a central engine.

astro-ph↗

The 1979, March 5 Gamma-Ray Transient: Was it a Classic Gamma-Ray Burst?

The March 5th, 1979 gamma-ray transient has long been thought to be fundamentally different from the classic gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). It had recurrences, pulsations, and a soft spectral component unlike classic GRBs. With the exception of the soft component reported from the Konus experiment, the unusual characteristics of March 5th were detectable main peak differs markedly from the published Konus spectrum. Rather than being dominated by a soft component similar to that observed in the soft gamma repeaters (SGRs), the ICE-PVO spectrum appears to be consistent with a classic GRB spectrum, especially above 100 keV. We believe that, given the ICE-PVO spectral observations, the March 5th transient would have been classified as a classic GRB when it was discovered. The SGRs and GRBs could be consanguineous: high-velocity neutron stars initially produce SGR events (and, occasionally a GRB like March 5th) and when they are older and in the galactic corona, they go through a GRB phase. The March 5th event demonstrates that high-velocity neutron stars at distances of tens kpc are capable of producing events like classic GRBs.

astro-ph↗

Gamma-Ray Burst Peak Duration as a Function of Energy

Gamma-ray burst time histories often consist of many peaks. These peaks tend to be narrower at higher energy. If gamma-ray bursts are cosmological, the energy dependence of gamma-ray burst time scales must be understood in order to correct the time scale dependence due to the expansion of the universe. By using the average autocorrelation function and the average pulse width, we show that the narrowing with energy follows, quite well, a power law. The power law index is about -0.4. This is the first quantitative relationship between temporal and spectral structure in gamma-ray bursts. It is unclear what physics causes this relationship. The average autocorrelation has a universal shape such that one energy range scales linearly with time into all other energy ranges. This shape is approximately the sum of two exponential.

astro-ph↗

The X-ray Spectrum of Soft Gamma Repeater 1806-20

Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGRs) are a class of rare, high-energy galactic transients that have episodes of short (~0.1 sec), soft (~30 keV), intense (~100 Crab), gamma-ray bursts. We report an analysis of the x-ray emission from 95 SGR1806-20 events observed by the International Cometary Explorer. The spectral shape remains remarkably constant for bursts that differ in intensity by a range of 50. Below 15 keV the number spectrum falls off rapidly such that we can estimate the total intensity of the events. Assuming that SGR1806-20 is associated with the supernova remnant G10.0-0.3 (Kulkarni and Frail, Murakami \etal), the brightest events had a total luminosity of ~1.8 x 10^42 erg sec^-1, a factor of 2 x 10^4 above the Eddington limit. A third of the emission was above 30 keV. There are at least three processes that are consistent with the spectral rollover below 15 keV. (1)The rollover is consistent with some forms of self absorption. Typical thermal temperatures are ~20 keV and require an emitting surface with a radius between 10 and 50 km. The lack of spectral variability implies that only the size of the emitting surface varies between events. If the process is thermal synchrotron the required magnetic field might be too small to confine the plasma against the super Eddington flux. (2)The low energy rollover could be due to photoelectric absorption by ~10^24 Hydrogen atoms cm^-2 of neutral material with a cosmic abundance assuming a continuum similar to TB with T= ~22 keV. (3) Emission in the two lowest harmonics from a 1.3 x 10^12 Gauss field would appear as Doppler broadened lines and fall off rapidly below 15 keV.

astro-ph↗