Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

E. S. Kammoun

Publications and source records attributed to E. S. Kammoun.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The nature of X-ray spectral variability in MCG-6-30-15

The flux-flux plot (FFP) method can provide model-independent clues regarding the X-ray variability of active galactic nuclei. To use it properly, the bin size of the light curves should be as short as possible, provided the average counts in the light curve bins are larger than $\sim 200$. We apply the FFP method to the 2013, simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the Seyfert galaxy MCG$-$6-30-15, in the 0.3-40 keV range. The FFPs above $\sim 1.6$ keV are well-described by a straight line. This result rules out spectral slope variations and the hypothesis of absorption driven variability. Our results are fully consistent with a power-law component varying in normalization only, with a spectral slope of $\sim 2$, plus a variable, relativistic reflection arising from the inner accretion disc around a rotating black hole. We also detect spectral components which remain constant over $\sim 4.5$ days (at least). At energies above $\sim 1.5$ keV, the stable component is consistent with reflection from distant, neutral material. The constant component at low energies is consistent with a blackbody spectrum of $kT_{\rm BB} \sim 100$ eV. The fluxes of these components are $\sim 10-20\%$ of the average continuum flux (in the respective bands). They should always be included in the models that are used to fit the spectrum of the source. The FFPs below 1.6 keV are non-linear, which could be due to the variable warm absorber in this source.

astro-ph.HE↗

Coronal properties of the luminous radio-quiet quasar QSO B2202$-$209

We present an analysis of the joint $XMM$-$Newton$ and $NuSTAR$ observations of the radio-quiet quasar QSO B2202$-$209. Using an optical observation from the Hale Telescope at the Palomar Observatory, we revise the redshift of the source from the previously reported $z=1.77$ to $z=0.532$, and we estimate the mass of the central black hole, $\log (M_{\rm BH}/M_{\odot}) = 9.08 \pm 0.18$. The X-ray spectrum of this source can be well described by a power-law of photon index $Γ= 1.82 \pm 0.05$ with $E_{\rm cut} = 152_{-54}^{+103}\,{\rm keV}$, in the rest frame of the source. Assuming a Comptonisation model, we estimate the coronal temperature to be $kT_{\rm e}=42\pm 3 \,{\rm keV}$ and $kT_{\rm e}= 56 \pm 3\,{\rm keV}$ for a spherical and a slab geometry, respectively. The coronal properties are comparable to the ones derived for local AGN, despite a difference of around one order of magnitude in black hole mass and X-ray luminosity ($L_{2-10} = 1.93\times 10^{45}\,{\rm erg\,s^{-1}}$). The quasar is X-ray loud, with an unusually flat observed optical-to-X-ray spectral slope $α_{\rm OX} = 1.00 \pm 0.02$, and has an exceptionally strong optical [O III] line. Assuming that both the X-ray emission and the [O III] line are isotropic, these two extreme properties can be explained by a nearly edge-on disk, leading to a reduction in the observed UV continuum light.

astro-ph.HE↗

Variability of the soft X-ray excess in IRAS 13224-3809

We study the soft excess variability of the narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxy IRAS 13224-3809. We considered all five archival XMM-Newton observations, and we applied the 'flux-flux plot' (FFP) method. We found that the flux-flux plots were highly affected by the choice of the light curves' time bin size, most probably because of the fast and large amplitude variations, and the intrinsic non-linear flux--flux relations in this source. Therefore, we recommend that the smallest bin-size should be used in such cases. Hence, We constructed FFPs in 11 energy bands below 1.7 keV, and we considered the 1.7-3 keV band, as being representative of the primary emission. The FFPs are reasonably well fitted by a 'power-law plus a constant' model. We detected significant positive constants in three out of five observations. The best-fit slopes are flatter than unity at energies below $\sim 0.9$ keV, where the soft excess is strongest. This suggests the presence of intrinsic spectral variability. A power-law-like primary component, which is variable in flux and spectral slope (as $Γ\propto N_{\rm PL}^{0.1}$) and a soft-excess component, which varies with the primary continuum (as $F_{\rm excess}\propto F_{\rm primary}^{0.46}$), can broadly explain the FFPs. In fact, this can create positive `constants', even when a stable spectral component does not exist. Nevertheless, the possibility of a stable, soft--band constant component cannot be ruled out, but its contribution to the observed 0.2-1 keV band flux should be less than $\sim 15$ %. The model constants in the FFPs were consistent with zero in one observation, and negative at energies below 1 keV in another. It is hard to explain these results in the context of any spectral variability scenario, but they may signify the presence of a variable, warm absorber in the source.

astro-ph.HE↗