arXiv subjects

Elena Hernandez-Martinez

Publications and source records attributed to Elena Hernandez-Martinez.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Simulating the LOcal Web (SLOW) -- VI: Gamma-ray Emission in the Local Universe

Context: Diffuse $γ$-ray emission from cosmic-ray (CR) protons scattering off the gas in the intracluster and intergalactic medium remains out of reach for current observations. Detecting this emission would provide constraints on the nonthermal pressure support by CR protons in these environments. Aims: We provide estimates for diffuse $γ$-ray emission in the \textit{Fermi}-LAT band from galaxy clusters and the cosmic web in the local Universe. Methods: In this work, we show results from the first cosmological magnetohydrodynamic simulation with an on-the-fly spectral CR model. We modeled CR injection at shocks, accounted for adiabatic energy changes and advection of CR protons, and obtained their $γ$-ray emissivity directly from the simulated CR energy density and spectra. To do this, we used constrained initial conditions that evolved in a field closely resembling that of the local Universe, allowing a direct comparison to \textit{Fermi}-LAT data on massive clusters. Results: We find CR proton acceleration at all structure formation and accretion shocks in galaxy clusters and cosmic web filaments. These protons provide the basis for diffuse $γ$-ray emission in these regimes. The absolute value of the diffuse $γ$-ray emission in our simulation lies a few orders of magnitude below the current upper limits found by \textit{Fermi}-LAT. Under the assumption of our model, a sensitivity of $F_γ< 10^{-11} \: γ~ \text{s}^{-1}~\text{cm}^{-2}$ would be required for a detection of diffuse emission in Coma. This provides a lower limit for diffuse emission from CR protons accelerated at structure formation shocks.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2025

Field-level simulation-based inference with galaxy catalogs: the impact of systematic effects

It has been recently shown that a powerful way to constrain cosmological parameters from galaxy redshift surveys is to train graph neural networks to perform field-level likelihood-free inference without imposing cuts on scale. In particular, de Santi et al. (2023) developed models that could accurately infer the value of $Ω_{\rm m}$ from catalogs that only contain the positions and radial velocities of galaxies that are robust to uncertainties in astrophysics and subgrid models. However, observations are affected by many effects, including 1) masking, 2) uncertainties in peculiar velocities and radial distances, and 3) different galaxy selections. Moreover, observations only allow us to measure redshift, intertwining galaxies' radial positions and velocities. In this paper we train and test our models on galaxy catalogs, created from thousands of state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations run with different codes from the CAMELS project, that incorporate these observational effects. We find that, although the presence of these effects degrades the precision and accuracy of the models, and increases the fraction of catalogs where the model breaks down, the fraction of galaxy catalogs where the model performs well is over 90 %, demonstrating the potential of these models to constrain cosmological parameters even when applied to real data.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2023

Robust Field-level Likelihood-free Inference with Galaxies

We train graph neural networks to perform field-level likelihood-free inference using galaxy catalogs from state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations of the CAMELS project. Our models are rotational, translational, and permutation invariant and do not impose any cut on scale. From galaxy catalogs that only contain $3$D positions and radial velocities of $\sim 1, 000$ galaxies in tiny $(25~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc})^3$ volumes our models can infer the value of $Ω_{\rm m}$ with approximately $12$ % precision. More importantly, by testing the models on galaxy catalogs from thousands of hydrodynamic simulations, each having a different efficiency of supernova and AGN feedback, run with five different codes and subgrid models - IllustrisTNG, SIMBA, Astrid, Magneticum, SWIFT-EAGLE -, we find that our models are robust to changes in astrophysics, subgrid physics, and subhalo/galaxy finder. Furthermore, we test our models on $1,024$ simulations that cover a vast region in parameter space - variations in $5$ cosmological and $23$ astrophysical parameters - finding that the model extrapolates really well. Our results indicate that the key to building a robust model is the use of both galaxy positions and velocities, suggesting that the network have likely learned an underlying physical relation that does not depend on galaxy formation and is valid on scales larger than $\sim10~h^{-1}{\rm kpc}$.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2023

Cosmology with one galaxy? -- The ASTRID model and robustness

Recent work has pointed out the potential existence of a tight relation between the cosmological parameter $Ω_{\rm m}$, at fixed $Ω_{\rm b}$, and the properties of individual galaxies in state-of-the-art cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. In this paper, we investigate whether such a relation also holds for galaxies from simulations run with a different code that made use of a distinct subgrid physics: Astrid. We find that also in this case, neural networks are able to infer the value of $Ω_{\rm m}$ with a $\sim10\%$ precision from the properties of individual galaxies while accounting for astrophysics uncertainties as modeled in CAMELS. This tight relationship is present at all considered redshifts, $z\leq3$, and the stellar mass, the stellar metallicity, and the maximum circular velocity are among the most important galaxy properties behind the relation. In order to use this method with real galaxies, one needs to quantify its robustness: the accuracy of the model when tested on galaxies generated by codes different from the one used for training. We quantify the robustness of the models by testing them on galaxies from four different codes: IllustrisTNG, SIMBA, Astrid, and Magneticum. We show that the models perform well on a large fraction of the galaxies, but fail dramatically on a small fraction of them. Removing these outliers significantly improves the accuracy of the models across simulation codes.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2022

Robust field-level inference with dark matter halos

We train graph neural networks on halo catalogues from Gadget N-body simulations to perform field-level likelihood-free inference of cosmological parameters. The catalogues contain $\lesssim$5,000 halos with masses $\gtrsim 10^{10}~h^{-1}M_\odot$ in a periodic volume of $(25~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc})^3$; every halo in the catalogue is characterized by several properties such as position, mass, velocity, concentration, and maximum circular velocity. Our models, built to be permutationally, translationally, and rotationally invariant, do not impose a minimum scale on which to extract information and are able to infer the values of $Ω_{\rm m}$ and $σ_8$ with a mean relative error of $\sim6\%$, when using positions plus velocities and positions plus masses, respectively. More importantly, we find that our models are very robust: they can infer the value of $Ω_{\rm m}$ and $σ_8$ when tested using halo catalogues from thousands of N-body simulations run with five different N-body codes: Abacus, CUBEP$^3$M, Enzo, PKDGrav3, and Ramses. Surprisingly, the model trained to infer $Ω_{\rm m}$ also works when tested on thousands of state-of-the-art CAMELS hydrodynamic simulations run with four different codes and subgrid physics implementations. Using halo properties such as concentration and maximum circular velocity allow our models to extract more information, at the expense of breaking the robustness of the models. This may happen because the different N-body codes are not converged on the relevant scales corresponding to these parameters.

astro-ph.CO↗