arXiv subjects

Eleni Metheniti

Publications and source records attributed to Eleni Metheniti.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What Are We Measuring in NLG? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Trends 2020-2025

As Natural Language Generation (NLG) dominates modern NLP, scalable evaluation remains a critical bottleneck. Consequently, LLM-as-a-judge (LaaJ) adoption has accelerated rapidly, appearing in more papers than human evaluation in 2025. This pivotal shift motivates a critical analysis of current evaluation practices. Overcoming the limits of rigid keyword filtering and manual review, we employ a multi-LLM information extraction pipeline to gather structured metadata from 14,171 papers across four major NLP conferences (2020-2025). Analyzing 3,334 filtered NLG papers, we identify three systemic challenges. (1) Metric inertia: despite the shift toward open-ended generation, legacy lexical metrics (BLEU, ROUGE) persist as primary indicators, typically used alongside rather than replaced by semantic alternatives. (2) Metric-criteria mapping problem: our paper-level co-occurrence data reveals that general-purpose automatic metrics are applied as broad proxies for quality, without specifying which dimension of text generation they are intended to evaluate. (3) Validation gap: LaaJ has grown rapidly without commensurate human validation (fewer than 8% of papers). Crucially, while LaaJ correlates with aggregate quality, alignment collapses on fine-grained criteria like fluency. To address these gaps, we distill our findings into a minimal Evaluation Checklist to guide metric selection, construct validity, and LaaJ deployment.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

COCORELI: Enforcing Execution Preconditions for Reliable Collaborative Instruction Following

Autonomous agents executing human instructions must operate reliably even when instructions are incomplete. While recent approaches improve detection of missing information, detection alone is insufficient: agents often proceed to execution even after recognizing underspecification, leading to incorrect or unsafe actions. We identify this failure as arising from a lack of coupling between detection and execution, and propose that reliable behavior requires enforcing missing information as a precondition for action. We instantiate this principle in Cocoreli, a modular architecture that represents task structure, tracks missing information, and blocks execution until required details are resolved through targeted clarification. In Cocoreli, detection and prevention are structurally coupled: detecting a missing parameter simultaneously blocks execution. We evaluate Cocoreli in a controlled construction environment isolating underspecification and sequential execution. Cocoreli blocks execution under unresolved specifications by construction, eliminating hallucinated actions. In contrast, chain-of-thought, prompt-chaining, and ReAct-style reasoning may still execute under incomplete specifications despite high detection rates. The same representation supports abstraction and reuse, and generalizes to API workflow tasks on ToolBench. These results show that reliable collaborative execution requires architectural enforcement, not just model capability

cs.CL↗

arXiv2020

Linguistically inspired morphological inflection with a sequence to sequence model

Inflection is an essential part of every human language's morphology, yet little effort has been made to unify linguistic theory and computational methods in recent years. Methods of string manipulation are used to infer inflectional changes; our research question is whether a neural network would be capable of learning inflectional morphemes for inflection production in a similar way to a human in early stages of language acquisition. We are using an inflectional corpus (Metheniti and Neumann, 2020) and a single layer seq2seq model to test this hypothesis, in which the inflectional affixes are learned and predicted as a block and the word stem is modelled as a character sequence to account for infixation. Our character-morpheme-based model creates inflection by predicting the stem character-to-character and the inflectional affixes as character blocks. We conducted three experiments on creating an inflected form of a word given the lemma and a set of input and target features, comparing our architecture to a mainstream character-based model with the same hyperparameters, training and test sets. Overall for 17 languages, we noticed small improvements on inflecting known lemmas (+0.68%) but steadily better performance of our model in predicting inflected forms of unknown words (+3.7%) and small improvements on predicting in a low-resource scenario (+1.09%)

cs.CL↗