arXiv subjects

Elisa Giaccardi

Publications and source records attributed to Elisa Giaccardi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Disentangling Innovation Practices in Automation-Adopting Organizations: a Co-Performance Perspective

As organizations increasingly adopt automation, innovation practitioners are responsible for selecting, adapting, testing, and implementing externally sourced innovations. However, little is known about how these upstream practices shape worker-automation arrangements, limiting our ability to intervene in innovation practice to address automation adoption challenges. To disentangle this relationship, we interviewed nine innovation practitioners at a major European airport pursuing long-term autonomous operations and analyzed their practices through a co-performance lens. We synthesize five co-performance design principles and examine where current practices align or conflict. Our findings reveal tensions: innovation practitioners prioritize full-automation arrangements while postponing human considerations; contextual constraints shape solutions, but openness to reconfiguration remains limited; and co-learning rarely extends beyond pilot phases. These insights provide HCI research and practice with guidance for reframing the conceptualization of automation, particularly by encouraging earlier consideration of human roles, promoting iterative visions, and recognizing workers as co-designers throughout innovation pipelines.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Queering AI: Undoing the Self in the Algorithmic Borderlands

This paper challenges fixed orientations towards the self in human-AI entanglements. It offers queering as a strategy to subvert the individuation and fixing of identities within algorithmic systems and the loss of futurity that it brings about. By exploring queerness, the paper examines how one's sense of self and futurity are interpellated within the algorithmic borderlands of human-AI entanglements. The study discusses an embodied experiment called "Undoing Gracia," a Digital Twin simulation where the first author Grace and their AI twins (Lex and Tortugi) interact within the fictional world of Gracia. The experiment probes into Grace's multifaceted subjectivities by conceiving themselves as interdependent entities evolving through their interactions within Gracia. The paper outlines the process of creating and implementing the simulation and examines how the agents co-perform and become-with alongside Gracia's making. The findings illuminate queer gestures for navigating human-AI entanglements in HCI research and practice, highlighting the importance of fluid identities in shaping human-AI relations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2022

Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system development

How can humans remain in control of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems designed to perform tasks autonomously? Such systems are increasingly ubiquitous, creating benefits - but also undesirable situations where moral responsibility for their actions cannot be properly attributed to any particular person or group. The concept of meaningful human control has been proposed to address responsibility gaps and mitigate them by establishing conditions that enable a proper attribution of responsibility for humans; however, clear requirements for researchers, designers, and engineers are yet inexistent, making the development of AI-based systems that remain under meaningful human control challenging. In this paper, we address the gap between philosophical theory and engineering practice by identifying, through an iterative process of abductive thinking, four actionable properties for AI-based systems under meaningful human control, which we discuss making use of two applications scenarios: automated vehicles and AI-based hiring. First, a system in which humans and AI algorithms interact should have an explicitly defined domain of morally loaded situations within which the system ought to operate. Second, humans and AI agents within the system should have appropriate and mutually compatible representations. Third, responsibility attributed to a human should be commensurate with that human's ability and authority to control the system. Fourth, there should be explicit links between the actions of the AI agents and actions of humans who are aware of their moral responsibility. We argue that these four properties will support practically-minded professionals to take concrete steps toward designing and engineering for AI systems that facilitate meaningful human control.

cs.CY↗