SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Emily B. Josephs

Publications and source records attributed to Emily B. Josephs.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

k-mer-based approaches to bridging pangenomics and population genetics

Many commonly studied species now have more than one chromosome-scale genome assembly, revealing a large amount of genetic diversity previously missed by approaches that map short reads to a single reference. However, many species still lack multiple reference genomes and correctly aligning references to build pangenomes is challenging, limiting our ability to study this missing genomic variation in population genetics. Here, we argue that $k$-mers are a crucial stepping stone to bridging the reference-focused paradigms of population genetics with the reference-free paradigms of pangenomics. We review current literature on the uses of $k$-mers for performing three core components of most population genetics analyses: identifying, measuring, and explaining patterns of genetic variation. We also demonstrate how different $k$-mer-based measures of genetic variation behave in population genetic simulations according to the choice of $k$, depth of sequencing coverage, and degree of data compression. Overall, we find that $k$-mer-based measures of genetic diversity scale consistently with pairwise nucleotide diversity ($π$) up to values of about $π= 0.025$ ($R^2 = 0.97$) for neutrally evolving populations. For populations with even more variation, using shorter $k$-mers will maintain the scalability up to at least $π= 0.1$. Furthermore, in our simulated populations, $k$-mer dissimilarity values can be reliably approximated from counting bloom filters, highlighting a potential avenue to decreasing the memory burden of $k$-mer based genomic dissimilarity analyses. For future studies, there is a great opportunity to further develop methods to identifying selected loci using $k$-mers.

q-bio.PE

Taking Quantitative Genomics into the Wild

A key goal in studies of ecology and evolution is understanding the causes of phenotypic diversity in nature. Most traits of interest, such as those relating to morphology, life-history, immunity and behaviour are quantitative, and phenotypic variation is driven by the cumulative effects of genetic and environmental variation. The field of quantitative genetics aims to quantify the additive genetic component of this trait variance (i.e. the "heritability"), often with the underlying assumption that trait variance is driven by many loci of infinitesimal effects throughout the genome. This approach allows us to understand the evolutionary potential of natural populations and can be extended to examine the genetic covariation with fitness to predict responses to selection. Therefore, quantitative genetic studies are fundamental to understanding evolution in the wild. Over the last two decades, there has been a wealth of studies investigating trait heritabilities and genetic correlations, but these were initially limited to long-term studies of pedigreed populations or common-garden experiments. However, genomic technologies have since allowed quantitative genetic studies in a more diverse range of wild systems and has increased the opportunities for addressing outstanding questions in ecology and evolution. In particular, genomic studies can uncover the genetic basis of fitness-related quantitative traits, allowing a better understanding of their evolutionary dynamics. We organised this special issue to highlight new work and review recent advances at the cutting edge of "Wild Quantitative Genomics". In this Editorial, we will present some history of wild quantitative genetic and genomic studies, before discussing the main themes in the papers published in this special issue and highlighting the future outlook of this dynamic field.

q-bio.PE