arXiv subjects

Emily Klein

Publications and source records attributed to Emily Klein.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Red Flags and Cherry Picking: Reading The Scientific Blackpill Wiki

Incels are an online community of men who share a belief in extreme misogyny, the glorification of violence, and biological essentialism. They refer to their core ideology as "The Blackpill", a belief that physical attraction is the only path to romantic success and that women are only attracted to one very specific, hypermasculine archetype. This is not only a belief system; incels believe their ideology grounded in hard science. The research that incels use as evidence of their belief system is collected in an extensive online document, the Scientific Blackpill wiki page. In this research, we analyze the claims made on the wiki against the research cited to assess how the wiki authors are using or misusing science in support of their ideology. We find that the page largely cites legitimate science and describes it partly or mostly accurately. However, in discussing it, the results are often overgeneralized, stripped of context, or otherwise distorted to support the preexisting incel viewpoint. This echoes previous findings about motivated reasoning and borrowing scientific legitimacy in other misinformation and conspiracy-minded ideologies. We discuss the implications this has for understanding online radicalization and information quality.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

In Bad Faith: Assessing Discussion Quality on Social Media

The quality of a user's social media experience is determined both by the content they see and by the quality of the conversation and interaction around it. In this paper, we look at replies to tweets from mainstream media outlets and official government agencies and assess if they are good faith, engaging honestly and constructively with the original post, or bad faith, attacking the author or derailing the conversation. We assess automated approaches that may help in making this determination and then show that within our dataset of replies to mainstream media outlets and government agencies, bad faith interactions constitute 68.3% of all replies we studied, suggesting potential concerns about the quality of discourse in these specific conversational contexts. This is particularly true from verified accounts, where 91.7% of replies were bad faith. Given that verified accounts are algorithmically amplified, we discuss the implications of our work for understanding the user experience on social media.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2025

Cross-Platform Violence Detection on Social Media: A Dataset and Analysis

Violent threats remain a significant problem across social media platforms. Useful, high-quality data facilitates research into the understanding and detection of malicious content, including violence. In this paper, we introduce a cross-platform dataset of 30,000 posts hand-coded for violent threats and sub-types of violence, including political and sexual violence. To evaluate the signal present in this dataset, we perform a machine learning analysis with an existing dataset of violent comments from YouTube. We find that, despite originating from different platforms and using different coding criteria, we achieve high classification accuracy both by training on one dataset and testing on the other, and in a merged dataset condition. These results have implications for content-classification strategies and for understanding violent content across social media.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

A Lexicon for Studying Radicalization in Incel Communities

Incels are an extremist online community of men who believe in an ideology rooted in misogyny, racism, the glorification of violence, and dehumanization. In their online forums, they use an extensive, evolving cryptolect - a set of ingroup terms that have meaning within the group, reflect the ideology, demonstrate membership in the community, and are difficult for outsiders to understand. This paper presents a lexicon with terms and definitions for common incel root words, prefixes, and affixes. The lexicon is text-based for use in automated analysis and is derived via a Qualitative Content Analysis of the most frequent incel words, their structure, and their meaning on five of the most active incel communities from 2016 to 2023. This lexicon will support future work examining radicalization and deradicalization/disengagement within the community.

cs.CL↗