arXiv subjects

Emma Finn

Publications and source records attributed to Emma Finn.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Where the Score Lives: A Wavelet View of Diffusion

Score-based generative models have had remarkable success over the last decade in generating a diverse set of visually plausible images. A variety of architectures including CNNs, U-Nets, and Transformers have been used as the score-approximation network in such diffusion modeling; however, to date, relatively little is known about how these architectural choices impact generative behavior. In this work, to provide insight into this area, we propose an analytically solvable parameterization of the score function using an expansion in a 2D orthogonal wavelet basis. In particular, we derive interpretable optimal score functions in terms of the moments of the data distribution. We use this parametrization to provide an architecture-agnostic, moment-based analysis that reveals which attributes of the data distribution tend to matter most for denoising. Our score machine is flexible enough to partially mimic the relevant inductive biases of multiple architectures, including U-Nets, and CNNs, taking a step towards understanding why different score architectures can exhibit distinct generative behavior. Since our score is solvable in terms of the moments of the data, we can begin to understand how the data distribution interacts with the score network to produce the behavior we observe in diffusion models.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Origins of Creativity in Attention-Based Diffusion Models

As diffusion models have become the tool of choice for image generation and as the quality of the images continues to improve, the question of how `creativity' originates in diffusion has become increasingly important. The score matching perspective on diffusion has proven particularly fruitful for understanding how and why diffusion models generate images that remain plausible while differing significantly from their training images. In particular, as explained in (Kamb \& Ganguli, 2024) and others, e.g., (Ambrogioni, 2023), theory suggests that if our score matching were optimal, we would only be able to recover training samples through our diffusion process. However, as shown by Kamb \& Ganguli, (2024), in diffusion models where the score is parametrized by a simple CNN, the inductive biases of the CNN itself (translation equivariance and locality) allow the model to generate samples that globally do not match any training samples, but are rather patch-wise `mosaics'. Notably, however, this theory does not extend to describe the role of self-attention in this process. In this work, we take a preliminary step in this direction to extend this theory to the case of diffusion models whose score is parametrized by a CNN with a final self-attention layer. We show that our theory suggests that self-attention will induce a globally image-consistent arrangement of local features beyond the patch-level in generated samples, and we verify this behavior empirically on a carefully crafted dataset.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Learning Artistic Signatures: Symmetry Discovery and Style Transfer

Despite nearly a decade of literature on style transfer, there is no undisputed definition of artistic style. State-of-the-art models produce impressive results but are difficult to interpret since, without a coherent definition of style, the problem of style transfer is inherently ill-posed. Early work framed style-transfer as an optimization problem but treated style as a measure only of texture. This led to artifacts in the outputs of early models where content features from the style image sometimes bled into the output image. Conversely, more recent work with diffusion models offers compelling empirical results but provides little theoretical grounding. To address these issues, we propose an alternative definition of artistic style. We suggest that style should be thought of as a set of global symmetries that dictate the arrangement of local textures. We validate this perspective empirically by learning the symmetries of a large dataset of paintings and showing that symmetries are predictive of the artistic movement to which each painting belongs. Finally, we show that by considering both local and global features, using both Lie generators and traditional measures of texture, we can quantitatively capture the stylistic similarity between artists better than with either set of features alone. This approach not only aligns well with art historians' consensus but also offers a robust framework for distinguishing nuanced stylistic differences, allowing for a more interpretable, theoretically grounded approach to style transfer.

cs.CV↗