arXiv subjects

Emmanuelle Claeys

Publications and source records attributed to Emmanuelle Claeys.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Probing Cultural Signals in Large Language Models through Author Profiling

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in applications with societal impact, raising concerns about the cultural biases they encode. We probe these representations by evaluating whether LLMs can perform author profiling from song lyrics in a zero-shot setting, inferring singers' gender and ethnicity without task-specific fine-tuning. Across several open-source models evaluated on more than 10,000 lyrics, we find that LLMs achieve non-trivial profiling performance but demonstrate systematic cultural alignment: most models default toward North American ethnicity, while DeepSeek-1.5B aligns more strongly with Asian ethnicity. This finding emerges from both the models' prediction distributions and an analysis of their generated rationales. To quantify these disparities, we introduce two fairness metrics, Modality Accuracy Divergence (MAD) and Recall Divergence (RD), and show that Ministral-8B displays the strongest ethnicity bias among the evaluated models, whereas Gemma-12B shows the most balanced behavior. Our code is available on [GitHub](https://github.com/ValentinLafargue/CulturalProbingLLM) and results on [HuggingFace](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ValentinLAFARGUE/AuthorProfilingResults).

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Buzz, Choose, Forget: A Meta-Bandit Framework for Bee-Like Decision Making

This work introduces MAYA, a sequential imitation learning model based on multi-armed bandits, designed to reproduce and predict individual bees' decisions in contextualized foraging tasks. The model accounts for bees' limited memory through a temporal window $\tau$, whose optimal value is around 7 trials, with a slight dependence on weather conditions. Experimental results on real, simulated, and complementary (mice) datasets show that MAYA (particularly with the Wasserstein distance) outperforms imitation baselines and classical statistical models, while providing interpretability of individual learning strategies and enabling the inference of realistic trajectories for prospective ecological applications.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Exposing the Illusion of Fairness: Auditing Vulnerabilities to Distributional Manipulation Attacks

The rapid deployment of AI systems in high-stakes domains, including those classified as high-risk under the The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), has intensified the need for reliable compliance auditing. For binary classifiers, regulatory risk assessment often relies on global fairness metrics such as the Disparate Impact ratio, widely used to evaluate potential discrimination. In typical auditing settings, the auditee provides a subset of its dataset to an auditor, while a supervisory authority may verify whether this subset is representative of the full underlying distribution. In this work, we investigate to what extent a malicious auditee can construct a fairness-compliant yet representative-looking sample from a non-compliant original distribution, thereby creating an illusion of fairness. We formalize this problem as a constrained distributional projection task and introduce mathematically grounded manipulation strategies based on entropic and optimal transport projections. These constructions characterize the minimal distributional shift required to satisfy fairness constraints. To counter such attacks, we formalize representativeness through distributional distance based statistical tests and systematically evaluate their ability to detect manipulated samples. Our analysis highlights the conditions under which fairness manipulation can remain statistically undetected and provides practical guidelines for strengthening supervisory verification. We validate our theoretical findings through experiments on standard tabular datasets for bias detection. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/ValentinLafargue/Inspection.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Generating Heterogeneous Multi-dimensional Data : A Comparative Study

Allocation of personnel and material resources is highly sensible in the case of firefighter interventions. This allocation relies on simulations to experiment with various scenarios. The main objective of this allocation is the global optimization of the firefighters response. Data generation is then mandatory to study various scenarios In this study, we propose to compare different data generation methods. Methods such as Random Sampling, Tabular Variational Autoencoders, standard Generative Adversarial Networks, Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks and Diffusion Probabilistic Models are examined to ascertain their efficacy in capturing the intricacies of firefighter interventions. Traditional evaluation metrics often fall short in capturing the nuanced requirements of synthetic datasets for real-world scenarios. To address this gap, an evaluation of synthetic data quality is conducted using a combination of domain-specific metrics tailored to the firefighting domain and standard measures such as the Wasserstein distance. Domain-specific metrics include response time distribution, spatial-temporal distribution of interventions, and accidents representation. These metrics are designed to assess data variability, the preservation of fine and complex correlations and anomalies such as event with a very low occurrence, the conformity with the initial statistical distribution and the operational relevance of the synthetic data. The distribution has the particularity of being highly unbalanced, none of the variables following a Gaussian distribution, adding complexity to the data generation process.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Fairness is in the details: Face Dataset Auditing

Auditing involves verifying the proper implementation of a given policy. As such, auditing is essential for ensuring compliance with the principles of fairness, equity, and transparency mandated by the European Union's AI Act. Moreover, biases present during the training phase of a learning system can persist in the modeling process and result in discrimination against certain subgroups of individuals when the model is deployed in production. Assessing bias in image datasets is a particularly complex task, as it first requires a feature extraction step, then to consider the extraction's quality in the statistical tests. This paper proposes a robust methodology for auditing image datasets based on so-called "sensitive" features, such as gender, age, and ethnicity. The proposed methodology consists of both a feature extraction phase and a statistical analysis phase. The first phase introduces a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture specifically designed for extracting sensitive features with a limited number of manual annotations. The second phase compares the distributions of sensitive features across subgroups using a novel statistical test that accounts for the imprecision of the feature extraction model. Our pipeline constitutes a comprehensive and fully automated methodology for dataset auditing. We illustrate our approach using two manually annotated datasets. The code and datasets are available at github.com/ValentinLafargue/FairnessDetails.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2020

Hyper-parameter Tuning for the Contextual Bandit

We study here the problem of learning the exploration exploitation trade-off in the contextual bandit problem with linear reward function setting. In the traditional algorithms that solve the contextual bandit problem, the exploration is a parameter that is tuned by the user. However, our proposed algorithm learn to choose the right exploration parameters in an online manner based on the observed context, and the immediate reward received for the chosen action. We have presented here two algorithms that uses a bandit to find the optimal exploration of the contextual bandit algorithm, which we hope is the first step toward the automation of the multi-armed bandit algorithm.

cs.LG↗