SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Enkun Li

Publications and source records attributed to Enkun Li.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hierarchical Gaussian-process test of DESI's dynamical dark-energy preference

DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB and Type~Ia supernovae in the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parameterisation prefers evolving dark energy over $\Lambda$CDM at roughly $2.8$--$4.2\sigma$. We reconstruct the same late-time expansion history with a hierarchical Gaussian process (GP) that co-samples the kernel hyperparameters $(\sigma_f,l)$ together with $(H_0, \Omega_m, \Omega_k, \omega_b h^2)$, coupling BAO, compressed Planck distance priors, and Pantheon+ through a Monte-Carlo effective likelihood conditioned on 37 cosmic-chronometer $H(z)$ points. The baseline posterior gives $w(z\simeq 0)=-0.80^{+0.26}_{-0.23}$ (68\%~C.L.), about $0.8\sigma$ from $w=-1$, with $l=3.79^{+0.81}_{-1.12}$. A CPL fit on the identical compressed Planck pipeline improves nested $\Lambda$CDM by only $\Delta\chi^2\sim 1$ ($\sim 1\sigma$). Ablations that fix $(\sigma_f,l)$, drop SN or LRG1/2 BAO, replace the radial-basis kernel by Mat\'ern-$5/2$, or tighten the prior on $l$ leave the median $w(0)$ within $\lesssim 1\sigma$ of $-1$. The mild preference reported here is therefore specific to this compressed-CMB analysis and does not address DESI's full Planck-likelihood result.

astro-ph.CO

Distinguish three time-dependent dark energy models using statefinder pairs with error bars and Bayesian evidence

In this work, two completely different approaches, statefinder with error bars and Bayesian evidence, are used to distinguish and judge three time-dependent dark energy models. The parameters constrain for the three dark energy models are given using the current cosmic observational data sets : $Planck$ 2015, SNIa, BAO and OHD. Using the statefinder pairs with error bars, we find that the error region of the dark energy model, whose equation of state parameter is given by $w(a) = w_0+w_3\frac{1-a}{a^2+(1-a)^2}$, is relativity compact than the other two models during the all the evolving history. Meanwhile, the Bayesian evidence also provide that this model is significantly better than the other two models and the other two models are inconclusive. Then, there are reasons for believing that this model is a preferential candidate in dark energy investigation rather than the other two.

gr-qc